blackthorn8
Roofer
As do Most others when governing ........people have short memories
The masses will never win over the few as they have vested interests in the major parties, politicians are in hog to their paymasters to keep them happy they play the game that suits there masters, and the general public can go and do one, and that starts from the local politics right to gover ing issuesAs do Most others when governing ........people have short memories
What a surprise, the rumours were true. How they think there might be more votes in this decision than continuing with it is baffling.Well, if reports today are true, and Sunak announces the rail link to Manchester will be postponed or worse still cancelled, that will be the final nail in the coffin of this run of Conservative government.
The polling I saw reported was something like more people thought it shouldn't have been built at all than wanted it built, but more people though if it is being built then it should continue to Manchester. So read that how you want regarding electoral impact. I wouldn't have thought it would swing that many votes either way personally.What a surprise, the rumours were true. How they think there might be more votes in this decision than continuing with it is baffling.
You have to replace train infrastructure at least every 70 years, we haven't done that and that is/was why HS2 is needed, as is HS3, 4, 5 and Crossrail 2.HS2 should never have been given the green light.
It was outdated, before fuckers started working from home in droves.
It didn't miss out big cities and city centres until the government tore the plan up. The whole point was to connect the rest of the country to London. The intention was also to eventually connect to Scotland.Yes infrastructure improvements are needed.
But a solution that misses out big cities and city centres is fucking stupid.
Best spent on connecting the country, rather than pouring more investment into London and giving a little boost to Birmingham...
Now going to run out of Euston rather Old Oak Commom (which hasn't been designed as a terminal station) to Birmingham.
So a few months after we laid of dozens of people who had been working on Euston for a years we now need to take on a new team, all that experience lost.
The tunneling is to protect AONB.It didn't miss out big cities and city centres until the government tore the plan up. The whole point was to connect the rest of the country to London. The intention was also to eventually connect to Scotland.
The amount of money being wasted to keep potential tory voters happy has massively impacted on the cost of HS2, we've spent months moving a small building because two flats could see it and weren't happy. Majority of, very expensive, tunneling is through tory areas.
Pretty much where I was at.The polling I saw reported was something like more people thought it shouldn't have been built at all than wanted it built, but more people though if it is being built then it should continue to Manchester
Maybe I'm cynical, but they wouldn't be making big decisions like this, at this stage in an electoral cycle, without doing it for votes.wouldn't have thought it would swing that many votes either way personally.
It's not just about speed, it's increased capacity, new stock and getting freight off the smaller lines.We already have 125mph rail lines to the major cities do we really need to go faster in our small country.?
Well it wasn't after some idiot put it on hold and seriously though trains could start/terminate there.That much was always going to be the case. There’s literally no point at all in the line if it’s only going as far as North West London.
Which he knows as it's been discussed again and again.It's not just about speed, it's increased capacity, new stock and getting freight off the smaller lines.
I did say the capacity issue was an argument some time ago but the number of people using trains has dropped and freight has reduced as well. Network rail have spent a lot of money raising bridges on the lines from Felixstowe and Southampton to the midlands, it seems odd that we want to stop using them.It's not just about speed, it's increased capacity, new stock and getting freight off the smaller lines.
Need to get people out of cars, that can only happen if there's a viable public transport alternative, trains and new routes are the way.I did say the capacity issue was an argument some time ago but the number of people using trains has dropped and freight has reduced as well. Network rail have spent a lot of money raising bridges on the lines from Felixstowe and Southampton to the midlands, it seems odd that we want to stop using them.
Hitachi are building new trains for East Coast, West Coast the MML and GWR. Trans Pennine have new Mk5 coaches West Midlands have new trains so whilst there's still room for improvement it's by no means terrible.
As I said the increase in speed is not really significant over the relatively short distances in this country. Freight on the roads will not be reduced because all most all distribution centers are not rail connected and can't take a train load at a time. Rail is great for bulk but not flexible enough for JITWhich he knows as it's been discussed again and again.
Why would you not go with high speed trains if you're putting in a new line, best of both worlds.
Also takes freight off the north/south roads.
Pie in the sky stuff, we have a viable public transport system between the major conurbations, 4 trains an hour to Birmingham, 3 trains to Manchester, 4 to Leeds 4 to Leicester and 2 to Scotland but most people don't want to travel between them on a regular basis.Need to get people out of cars, that can only happen if there's a viable public transport alternative, trains and new routes are the way.
You may want to sit down with tory and labour mayors from the Midlands and North and local businesses.Pie in the sky stuff, we have a viable public transport system between the major conurbations, 4 trains an hour to Birmingham, 3 trains to Manchester, 4 to Leeds 4 to Leicester and 2 to Scotland but most people don't want to travel between them on a regular basis.
I agree that capacity constrains are an issue at peak times but for the amounts of money being banded about there are a lot of small infrastructure and signalling projects which would help a lot. Electrification makes a big difference to acceleration times of trains so that gives shorter head ways and more capacity.You may want to sit down with tory and labour mayors from the Midlands and North and local businesses.
Those trains you've mentioned mean that you can't easily expand the number of local trains which is one of the things HS2 would ensure.
There are a number of routes for the trains to take.Sunak’s maths & problem-solving skills aren’t as good as we’re led to believe.
Good thing it wasn’t Dianne Abbott saying this.
I mentioned above why costs have escalated. Putting Euston back by a few months and now bringing on board a new design team will mean it gets built even later and gave a guess what that means.I agree that capacity constrains are an issue at peak times but for the amounts of money being banded about there are a lot of small infrastructure and signalling projects which would help a lot. Electrification makes a big difference to acceleration times of trains so that gives shorter head ways and more capacity.
I was persuaded that HS2 to Manchester and Leeds was a positive thing but just not very cost effective, the escalating costs are the issue now.
Do you mean directly & quicker as was the point of these improvements, or eventually by some convoluted, longer route?There are a number of routes for the trains to take.
YesDo you mean directly & quicker as was the point of these improvements, or eventually by some convoluted, longer route?