Truss has gone

[Adumass]

Why bother you never see what's written anyway

I'll certainly have to read my own interpretation into that answer.

 

[Club_B00k_Crutchless]

the policies of all the parties and bring about it's collapse.

Seeing as the Tories have been in Govt for 12 years, what policies of other parties are bringing about this "collapse"?

 

[AFCDorset]

I didn't ask you what the constitution requires. I inferred from your comment that you consider the current selection process undemocratic, or insufficiently democratic, with reference to the alternatives including some involvement of the Conservative Party membership or General Election, and I asked which of those you favoured. This leaves open that your response may be that either of those would simply be part of whatever we are calling the globalist plan today (which at least has the virtue of not having to really think about it properly).

We have a process for changing a prime minister in these circumstances and it is up to the relevant party to do so according to their rules. You follow the rules or change them democratically.

My concern is that the Tory party is largely in line with the globalist agenda so will pick two candidates who will do what is required of them. In the last ballot the Tories expected Sunak to win easily, so selected Truss as they considered her a 'lightweight' and easily beatable. They were wrong.

I do not favour either of the selection processes you mention but see no reason to break the rules as they are. Perhaps when the power cuts arrive in few months time, along with other impositions, you may choose to think about it 'properly'.

 

[Mistryman]

We have a process for changing a prime minister in these circumstances and it is up to the relevant party to do so according to their rules. You follow the rules or change them democratically.

My concern is that the Tory party is largely in line with the globalist agenda so will pick two candidates who will do what is required of them. In the last ballot the Tories expected Sunak to win easily, so selected Truss as they considered her a 'lightweight' and easily beatable. They were wrong.

I do not favour either of the selection processes you mention but see no reason to break the rules as they are. Perhaps when the power cuts arrive in few months time, along with other impositions, you may choose to think about it 'properly'.

So isn't the fact you've said you'd vote for them again contrary to this wonderful insight?

Either you're taking the piss or you can't quite make your mind up, but you're leaving enough space to blame the "globalists".

 

[AFCDorset]

Seeing as the Tories have been in Govt for 12 years, what policies of other parties are bringing about this "collapse"?

Primarily the deliberate placement of Common Purpose functionaries across all levels of government and the public sector. Every level from minor town hall functionaries to members of the Supreme Court.

Plenty of others including, throwing away gold reserves, climate change, unlimited immigration, pro EU and the entirety of the woke agenda.

 

[AFCDorset]

So isn't the fact you've said you'd vote for them again contrary to this wonderful insight?

Either you're taking the piss or you can't quite make your mind up, but you're leaving enough space to blame the "globalists".

Come on, keep up.
I said I might consider voting Tory in a GE, simply because on a day to day basis the Lib/Lab parties are an even bigger crock of shit than the Tories. Not sure that voting matters much anyway.

On a strategic level all parties are the same, pro everything globalist, therefor the end of the UK as an independent state.

Of course the only real reason to vote Tory is to wind up the hard of thinking!

 

[Mistryman]

Of course the only real reason to vote Tory is to wind up the hard of thinking!

Masochist then!