Britons who don’t get vaccinated for COVID-19 might get barred from restaurants

jackieguaccamo said:
Not really, but feel free to research, keep an open mind and see what you think at the end of it.
Click to expand...
That's just the thing though, I'm far from just starting out when it comes to alternative media and research, my aim is always to be fair and balanced to anything that i come across.

When I read claims, whichever side the debate they fall on I try to apply the same approach, this usually means digging down into who has made the claim, their background and bias and what there is that supports those claims.

Your right to highlight the need to keep an open mind, because we all have bias, unwittingly or not.

So, I've read a fair amount about the gates foundation and there appears to be a lack of veracity in respect of the nefarious claims levelled against it, I think your suggesting this isn't your belief.

I am completely open to information that challenges my opinion, i would hope that you're open to sharing what it is that's convinced you?
 
Running Fox said:
you need to be more insulting, note can do better on your report
Click to expand...
I haven't insulted Bnet, I've questioned his sources which he seems to have taken personally.
Strange, as I'm probably the only one who knows him in the real world (although he did at one point think I may be Daz), thought we got on ok up until me questioning his theories on Covid, vaccines, pizzagate and 5G.
 
hackneyfox said:
I haven't insulted Bnet, I've questioned his sources which he seems to have taken personally.
Strange, as I'm probably the only one who knows him in the real world (although he did at one point think I may be Daz), thought we got on ok up until me questioning his theories on Covid, vaccines, pizzagate and 5G.
Click to expand...
And the claim THEY were involved in the sinking of the Titanic
 
bnet said:
What do they want you vaccinated against, only the complete idiots believe that there is a pandemic, there’s about 10 of these on here. Yellow star badge and a trip to the showers for these donuts.
Click to expand...
How can you post this, then four pages later complain that Bill Gates might be into eugenics? It's pretty high up on the offensiveness stakes, as well as the irony.

I'm hoping you don't believe the Holocaust was also a conspiracy theory - after all there was no YouTube in those days.
 
bnet said:
nano chip dopey bollocks, the've even said about vaccines, they didn't say specifically Covid, but they have said it.

and the gigglling girls with their likes, youre the hero to them faggots for saying that,.
Click to expand...
Will the nano chip require a power supply? What will be its purpose?
 
Running Fox said:
Thought that was an iceberg?
Click to expand...
bnet said:
I wonder how the population of the world will reduce by 15% by vaccinations ? He is a leader in eugenics, no B so what have any of you brain surgeons got to say about that. Reducing a population means killing people off, can you grasp that ? What do the daft lads think it means ??
Click to expand...
Let’s try and keep this very simple for you.
imagine the world is a fruit bowl, buying apples=births and eating apples=deaths.

now I buy 10 apples a week, every week and I eat 7 apples a week leaving a surplus of three apples every week, I buy three more than I need because some of the apples go off and have to be thrown away. This leads to the fruit bowl overflowing with too many apples.

Due to advances in farming apples don’t go off as much now so instead of buying 10 apples every week and hoping they don’t go off I now only buy 7 apples a week or if I’ve been educated that eating too many apples is bad for you only 5 apples a week.

After a while there is more room in the fruit bowl because it’s not over flowing with apples.

Next week we’ll try and cover grammar.

👍
 
Outfoxed said:
Let’s try and keep this very simple for you.
imagine the world is a fruit bowl, buying apples=births and eating apples=deaths.

now I buy 10 apples a week, every week and I eat 7 apples a week leaving a surplus of three apples every week, I buy three more than I need because some of the apples go off and have to be thrown away. This leads to the fruit bowl overflowing with too many apples.

Due to advances in farming apples don’t go off as much now so instead of buying 10 apples every week and hoping they don’t go off I now only buy 7 apples a week or if I’ve been educated that eating too many apples is bad for you only 5 apples a week.

After a while there is more room in the fruit bowl because it’s not over flowing with apples.

Next week we’ll try and cover grammar.

👍
Click to expand...
Do you realise how stupid that sounds? You are saying that by saving children the population will go down? Do not give up your day job
 
Outfoxed said:
now I buy 10 apples a week, every week and I eat 7 apples a week leaving a surplus of three apples every week, I buy three more than I need because some of the apples go off and have to be thrown away. This leads to the fruit bowl overflowing with too many apples.




Next week we’ll try and cover grammar.

👍
Click to expand...

Now 👍

Btw you can have a field day with me because I am shite at grammar 😁
 
There is some truth in the idea that lowering infant mortality will lower the birthrate, but for that to occur will take generations to change an established culture.

What will be more effective, and much more quickly, is the combination of wealth and effective birth control. The 'wealth' stimulus tends to act quite rapidly, people are less likely to want loads of kids if they have a more comfortable life.
 
Running Fox said:
Thought that was an iceberg?
Click to expand...
That is apparently what 'they' want us to think. We've now been informed that wasn't the case (they were trying to knock off a banker I believe), we haven't yet been told how the iceberg was tricked into colliding with The Titanic or if it was the captain of The Titanic why he would do such a thing. May have an update in January.
 
AFCDorset said:
There is some truth in the idea that lowering infant mortality will lower the birthrate, but for that to occur will take generations to change an established culture.

What will be more effective, and much more quickly, is the combination of wealth and effective birth control. The 'wealth' stimulus tends to act quite rapidly, people are less likely to want loads of kids if they have a more comfortable life.
Click to expand...
Surely if you have a more comfortable life you'd want more kids?
Thought those in poverty had more kids due to higher levels of infant mortality.
 
hackneyfox said:
That is apparently what 'they' want us to think. We've now been informed that wasn't the case (they were trying to knock off a banker I believe), we haven't yet been told how the iceberg was tricked into colliding with The Titanic or if it was the captain of The Titanic why he would do such a thing. May have an update in January.
Click to expand...
i know all about that story, but we will never know the truth so do not worry about it unlike the vaccine discussion which should be played out in our lifetime. I do not say I know all the answers but most have to admit that at the moment this world is not following a logical path.
 
BarrowFox said:
So your saying more children dying is for the greater good of mankind?

Bizarre concept
Click to expand...
Just a point here Bill gates supports abortions in the USA by giving $11000,000 last year, and they want no time restriction on when it can be performed. I watched that debate taking place so please do not put up a link saying that is untrue. Last year 11.5 million abortions world wide.
 
AFCDorset said:
There is some truth in the idea that lowering infant mortality will lower the birthrate, but for that to occur will take generations to change an established culture.

What will be more effective, and much more quickly, is the combination of wealth and effective birth control. The 'wealth' stimulus tends to act quite rapidly, people are less likely to want loads of kids if they have a more comfortable life.
Click to expand...
They're partly synonymous. Increased wealth goes hand in hand with reduced infant mortality. Hans Rosling's book 'Factfullness' has quite a good illustration of the four levels of poverty wealth (look down the bottom for proportion of world population at each level).

As wealth increases, infant mortality - and rate of childbirth - falls away rapidly.1606933295907.png
 
AFCDorset said:
There is some truth in the idea that lowering infant mortality will lower the birthrate, but for that to occur will take generations to change an established culture.

What will be more effective, and much more quickly, is the combination of wealth and effective birth control. The 'wealth' stimulus tends to act quite rapidly, people are less likely to want loads of kids if they have a more comfortable life.
Click to expand...
I think it's also the case that ensuring that girls and women have access to education and employment plays a significant role. Of course this is related to the birth control and wealth factors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top