bnet
Roofer
you threatened to grass me up to the thought police about the upstart shots that you seem to have a thing about, no ?I've admitted nothing of the sort!
you threatened to grass me up to the thought police about the upstart shots that you seem to have a thing about, no ?I've admitted nothing of the sort!
To clarify:you threatened to grass me up to the thought police about the upstart shots that you seem to have a thing about, no ?
There is proof Buz, lots of it. I also think that the people that use the board and take it for what it is are better than the small group of people that use the board but are then happy to work together to report the site and Micky to the authorities.I have no time for anybody who has reported the site or anybody who accuses specific others (or subset of others) of doing so without absolute proof it was that/those individual(s) (and if someone has that proof they should post it on the board in as far as is possible without falling foul of the law). Bunch of cunts the lot of 'em and one's no better than the other in my book.
Fine. Post it then or explain the specifics of why you can't.There is proof Buz, lots of it.
Not for me to do so. I trust Micky 100% and I think what the named have tried to do is really disgustingly low and a nasty thing to do to Micky. And they know it.Fine. Post it then or explain the specifics of why you can't.
Keep dancing. We know the truth.There is proof Buzz, the individua/ls involved said they were going to report the board.
Jackie would like to see all the groovy gang hung out to dry so he’s included me in his hysterical claims. I was not involved.
Yet without showing any proof you’ll slander anyone you don’t like.Not for me to do so. I trust Micky 100% and I think what the named have tried to do is really disgustingly low and a nasty thing to do to Micky. And they know it.
The board is whatever the people who visit it make of it. I've made my position clear on those who reported the site but it doesn't necessarily mean what the board 'is' is the same for me as it is for you.There is proof Buz, lots of it. I also think that the people that use the board and take it for what it is are better than the small group of people that use the board but are then happy to work together to report the site and Micky to the authorities.
Yes because I know the truth. I'm not slandering anyone, I'm slandering you, sardine, foxgolfer, nwf, daz and another.Yet without showing any proof you’ll slander anyone you don’t like.
I’ve paid my monthly dues, bought the fanzine and just about every badge going, why would I then want to fuck things up for Micky just because I disagree with some of the posts on here?
I'm not saying that at all, I like this part of the board, I'm not rude on the footy board, but this is the conspiracy board, if you don't like it, which I understand if you didn't, then don't go on the board. But to work together to report the site and Micky to the fucking authorities because you don't like it is a fucking low move, and yeah, I'm really fucked off that the named people would do that to Micky, especially knowing his personal situation and all the hard work and money that has gone into this board. It's upsetting to a lot of people.The board is whatever the people who visit it make of it. I've made my position clear on those who reported the site but it doesn't necessarily mean what the board 'is' is the same for me as it is for you.
Not yet. Why? Because I don't have to, but you know.Are you not brave enough to name ‘and another’.
You know exactly what went on. You were part of it.We all know who reported the board, for whatever reason he no longer posts on here. Whether someone else did I don’t know but I’m confident that NWF didn’t. He threatened to go to a solicitor due to your childish upskirt comments, totally different to what actually happened.
Don’t know Daz but reasonably sure he didn’t either, did he ever threaten to?
Why don't you name him, you know, and I know you know.weird that you’ll name people you have no proof against and won’t name this other individual.
Yeah, very weird. It's not really, is it?weird that you’ll name people you have no proof against and won’t name this other individual.
WrongYou know exactly what went on. You were part of it.
I seriously don’t know unless its one of the groovy gang. Doubt cbc was involved.Why don't you name him, you know, and I know you know.
Like I say, the truth will out, and when it does, I'll drag all these posts of you fuckers lying like snkes up again and again.
It is to me, he’s calling me out when I’m not involved, mentioning other names but then there’s someone he won’t name until later.Yeah, very weird. It's not really, is it?
I’m not the one calling people out.Why don't you name him, you know, and I know you know.
If you know"the truth" you wouldn't be saying a gang of people got together to report the board, because that's bollocks, but you've made your mind up so it doesn't matter what anyone says. You're judge, jury and executioner in your own little kangaroo court.Yes because I know the truth
He was part of what?You know exactly what went on. You were part of it.
It’s what you do, shit stir.Like I say, the truth will out, and when it does, I'll drag all these posts of you fuckers lying like snkes up again and again.
No one's inferred you were involved have they? So I don't know what this discussion has got to do with you, or why I would need to answer your questions. Ask Hackney to tell you what happened, he knows, and Dime Bar knows, and NWF knows, and that spineless freak Sardine knows, I'm sure they will tell you in private.If you know"the truth" you wouldn't be saying a gang of people got together to report the board, because that's bollocks, but you've made your mind up so it doesn't matter what anyone says. You're judge, jury and executioner in your own little kangaroo court.
He was part of what?
Seeing as it's a bit of a witch hunt on a public forum I'm entitled to ask. Your pal Dickie has inferred I was involved.So I don't know what this discussion has got to do with you, or why I would need to answer your questions.
It's not a witch hunt. Where did my BBF Dicky infer that you were involved?Seeing as it's a bit of a witch hunt on a public forum I'm entitled to ask. Your pal Dickie has inferred I was involved.