You’re so full of shit it’s oozing out of your ears you gullible foollets take your twattish remarks apart for once.
* "you're mate Trump"
. how's he my mate ? l am not American can't influence anything so l don't try, I'm against communism so I'm against Democtracs, whose name doesn't match their politics.
* "living lavishly".
why shouldn't he ? he's a rich man. Heres an interesting fact, Trump is the first president to be worth less money after serving a term.
* "in that case- how can you support him"
- l don't, but its a moot question
* "when is the second coming taking place"
I guess you mean when does Trump officially be president. The answer is as soon as the fraud is rectified. Incidentally the Demonrats have sent 100 lawyers to AZ to fight this one case. Why would you do that if it was a honest election ??
* "you're the guy with the knowledge".
- I've never said that. The difference between me and you, besides that huge chip on your shoulder, l don't watch MSM to help me make life decisions . If you get a dictionary and look up the word "gullible". its not a mirror, its a photo of you.
A perfectly reasonable and sensible argument, rather spoiled by the last sentence.Women were stuck in unhappy and abusive marriages, family units as you may wish to call them. Feminism has enabled them to take more control over their own lives. The men need to grow up a bit and stop acting like children. They just use the women as replacement for their mum, still wanting to live the life, go to the pub with the lads and go home to ironed clothes and tea on the table.
It may surprise you but gay people have been around for centuries. They have become more prominent because they are also fighting for equality and becoming more vocal and proud of who they are.
Like I said before, it must be awful to see the foundations of your little ivory towers being chipped away you poor little things.
Morning Mistryman. Thats the point, it sounds preferable.Progressive sounds preferable to me - it sounds like we’re moving away from the outdated modes & ways of thinking regarding race, gender, religion etc.
That had to be a good thing.
This is a good thing - for instance, if we find that the police are profiling certain groups, then this has to be highlighted.it emphasises racial differences
Makes it sound like child abuse never existed in less "progressive" times.allows children to be sexually abused
When should it be introduced then - when they are too entrenched to think differently?introduces moral relativism to children too young to understand it
That's a fairly broad net you've spread there - if someone's an obviously racist idiot for example, then it's got nothing to do with being contrary, it's just wrong. Those people need to think about how society is improved by their utterances.cancels the lives of anyone who dares to express views contrary to the narrative
Lables Sixthswan. The reality of 'progressive' social policies is that they are not seeking to improve things but to establish a new repressive norm. It is obvious to me, but apparently not to you.Any social reform can be labelled as "progressive." Depends on your viewpoint.
Progression indicates change.
You have a warped view of the world AFC. Have you considered seeing someone, to find out where your concealed anger comes from?
Thanks for the considered reply Mm.This is a good thing - for instance, if we find that the police are profiling certain groups, then this has to be highlighted.
Makes it sound like child abuse never existed in less "progressive" times.
When should it be introduced then - when they are too entrenched to think differently?
That's a fairly broad net you've spread there - if someone's an obviously racist idiot for example, then it's got nothing to do with being contrary, it's just wrong. Those people need to think about how society is improved by their utterances.
Lables Sixthswan. The reality of 'progressive' social policies is that they are not seeking to improve things but to establish a new repressive norm. It is obvious to me, but apparently not to you.
When I can chat to someone perceptive enough to recognise 'concealed anger' in someone they have never met, why should I consider 'seeing someone'?
This is the big difference between 'progressives' and people like me. I believe that as an adult, you can think and live your life as you please (usual caveats apply). If I do not agree with your views we can chat about them, which may or may not be enlightening and worthwhile but I have no interest in forcing such a person to change those views by force.
But this is exactly what 'progressives' do, they require you to share there views and support the 'progressive' narrative, if you do not do so they will ruin your life.
By suggesting that someone who has different views to yourself needs to 'see someone', presumably so these errant views can be corrected, is a perfect example of the way 'progressives' think.
I must be looking at it from a different angle then - on this issue specifically, I got the impression that the offenders & those of influence closest to them were doing everything to hush those that they’d abused, or covering up what they’d done.no excuse for progressive policies that protect and institutionalise child abuse.