So who's following the rules...

Going to carry on as normal as possible. Don't agree with the second lockdown.

Unfortunately we have to go through some curtailment of liberties. There will be stuff we can't do for quite a while now.

It's a shame that Boris didn't try the circuit break for two weeks, as he was advised to weeks ago. Not saying I agreed with that either, but we would be in a far better state now.

My personal view is protect the vulnerable. Not enforced protection, just advice for their own sakes. Spend loads of cash on large amounts of intensive care bedding and staffing. Which would be far cheaper than shutting down swathes of the economy. Let everyone else carry on as before.
 
Going to carry on as normal as possible. Don't agree with the second lockdown.

Unfortunately we have to go through some curtailment of liberties. There will be stuff we can't do for quite a while now.

It's a shame that Boris didn't try the circuit break for two weeks, as he was advised to weeks ago. Not saying I agreed with that either, but we would be in a far better state now.

My personal view is protect the vulnerable. Not enforced protection, just advice for their own sakes. Spend loads of cash on large amounts of intensive care bedding and staffing. Which would be far cheaper than shutting down swathes of the economy. Let everyone else carry on as before.
This is not about the health of the people, has not been for a very long time.

If it were, why would the government;

Release large numbers of clearly ill and untested elderly people back into the care homes. This started in February and March and is responsible for a large proportion of deaths and serious illnesses in the 'first wave'.

Encourage doctors and others to include 'covid19' on death certificates whatever the actual cause of death.

Not advise the use of vitamins and other supplements that are known to boost the immune system.

Suppress all reports of the effectiveness of HCQ+ treatments, and deliberately make it 'unavailable'.

Try to continue the lockdown through the summer months when sunshine, fresh air and exposure to the low levels of the virus at that time would have boosted peoples immune systems.

Promotion of the 'second wave' theory to force a new lockdown. Huge numbers of false positives being generated by unreliable mass testing is the justification, the general increase in hospitalisations that happen at this time of the year is being promoted as the truth of this scenario.

Covid19 is a normal 'winter virus' with a nasty sideline is respiratory tract infections. Like all such viruses it mostly affects the old and the infirm. Will some people of working age have a serious reaction to it, yes they will, but most will not.

Some nominally fit people will die, tragic though that is they are unusual 'outriders' and cruel as it sounds, statistically insignificant.

What is even crueler is the use of the phrase 'if it saves one life'.
 

Bringing the facts to the treacherous left -​


COVID-19 UK GOVERNMENT ADMITS VIRUS DOESN’T EXIST While preparing the court papers for the Private Criminal Prosecution of MPs for pandemic fraud, we have discovered that the office of the secretary of state for mandatory vaccinations has now admitted in a Freedom of Information Request [FOI] that they have no records which show that the cause of the COVID 19 virus has ever been proven to exist. Yes, you did read that correctly. ADMISSION OF GUILT To put this in perspective, this is akin to the UK banks admitting that they never lend any money, when we started alleging that against them more than a decade ago. It therefore doesn’t take much effort to work out that the pressure the Private Criminal Prosecution has placed upon every serving MP has catalysed the beginning of the end for this treacherous Parliament. One way or another. Moreover, since the UK government has confessed that they have no record of the existence of the cause of the supposedly deadly virus, upon which the validity of Parliament’s COVID-1984 policies is entirely dependent, no MP is capable of successfully pleading not guilty to our allegations of pandemic fraud. DHSC HOLDS NO INFORMATION ON ISOLATION OF SARS-COV-2 [THE ALLEGED CAUSE OF THE PANDEMIC] Nevertheless, here lies the very heart of the dishonesty, which all COVID-1984 policies continue to be predicated upon: In short, the cause of the virus [and therefore the virus itself] have never been proven to exist and everybody in the Department of Health knows it.
 
The faggot group on here will hate this news !

I just can't think why, except they like to tell us how thick we are as well as racist homophobes. Their ammunition is being taken away isn't it. Everyone of thems a twat.
 
As labels get chucked around like confetti, am I the only one who over the last few months has found oneself wondering at what point in time the right became the left and the left became the right?
 
I'm not a leftie. But I thought I'd take a look at the FOI claim above.

It comes from the following request:


Andrew Johnson is asking for every record of every person who has deceased in the UK, where a description of how SARS-COV-2 was isolated exists. The response was PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.

This has then been used to make outlandish claims. Does the requester actually expect this information to be recorded and even if it was; to be provided? They have even provided a link to explain that the probability to culture a virus is as low as 6% only 10 days after onset of the disease.

Mountain made, out of grain of sand.
 
Nice find Sixthswan.

The data driving policy in the UK is either fake or manipulated.

The 'policy' is nothing to do with public health, it is to destroy our economy and way of life.

It's working.
 
I'm not a leftie. But I thought I'd take a look at the FOI claim above.

It comes from the following request:


Andrew Johnson is asking for every record of every person who has deceased in the UK, where a description of how SARS-COV-2 was isolated exists. The response was PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.

This has then been used to make outlandish claims. Does the requester actually expect this information to be recorded and even if it was; to be provided? They have even provided a link to explain that the probability to culture a virus is as low as 6% only 10 days after onset of the disease.

Mountain made, out of grain of sand.
Interesting SS but are you sure that's the request that Bnet's post refers to? The post references DHSC whereas the FOI request is to PHE. It's possible of course that someone has confused the two but I wonder if there is another similar request?
 
Interesting SS but are you sure that's the request that Bnet's post refers to? The post references DHSC whereas the FOI request is to PHE. It's possible of course that someone has confused the two but I wonder if there is another similar request?

It was all I could find, that bears any resemblance to the claims made.
 
The last lockdown was a complete failure more died than before it, people have the right to live how they choose if some want to lock themselves in their homes thats fine but the rest of us want real freedom.
Sod the experts and their trained monkey political halfwits.
 

Bringing the facts to the treacherous left -​


COVID-19 UK GOVERNMENT ADMITS VIRUS DOESN’T EXIST While preparing the court papers for the Private Criminal Prosecution of MPs for pandemic fraud, we have discovered that the office of the secretary of state for mandatory vaccinations has now admitted in a Freedom of Information Request [FOI] that they have no records which show that the cause of the COVID 19 virus has ever been proven to exist. Yes, you did read that correctly. ADMISSION OF GUILT To put this in perspective, this is akin to the UK banks admitting that they never lend any money, when we started alleging that against them more than a decade ago. It therefore doesn’t take much effort to work out that the pressure the Private Criminal Prosecution has placed upon every serving MP has catalysed the beginning of the end for this treacherous Parliament. One way or another. Moreover, since the UK government has confessed that they have no record of the existence of the cause of the supposedly deadly virus, upon which the validity of Parliament’s COVID-1984 policies is entirely dependent, no MP is capable of successfully pleading not guilty to our allegations of pandemic fraud. DHSC HOLDS NO INFORMATION ON ISOLATION OF SARS-COV-2 [THE ALLEGED CAUSE OF THE PANDEMIC] Nevertheless, here lies the very heart of the dishonesty, which all COVID-1984 policies continue to be predicated upon: In short, the cause of the virus [and therefore the virus itself] have never been proven to exist and everybody in the Department of Health knows it.
 
Is it? Show us mr dangerous vicious mad dog !

say something rellevent with a bit of substance you soft wanker. If you’ve got a grudge which you obviously have do something about it and stop acting like a little spoilt kid.
 
Interesting SS but are you sure that's the request that Bnet's post refers to? The post references DHSC whereas the FOI request is to PHE. It's possible of course that someone has confused the two but I wonder if there is another similar request?
Ah OK

Bnet can you clarify please?
 
The last lockdown was a complete failure more died than before it, people have the right to live how they choose if some want to lock themselves in their homes thats fine but the rest of us want real freedom.
Sod the experts and their trained monkey political halfwits.
More people would have died without the lockdown.
People who are high risk aren't really choosing to lock themsekves in their homes, they have to due to those who continue to with their 'real freedom' to not wear a mask, use shops and public transport then meet up with their mates for parties.
 
Is it? Show us mr dangerous vicious mad dog !

say something rellevent with a bit of substance you soft wanker. If you’ve got a grudge which you obviously have do something about it and stop acting like a little spoilt kid.
the ignorance and utter contempt you come out would be funny if it was not so pathetic........question were you a lonely child or did mummy and daddy not give you enough cuddles when you were younger, something has to explain that missing chromosome of yours
 
the ignorance and utter contempt you come out would be funny if it was not so pathetic........question were you a lonely child or did mummy and daddy not give you enough cuddles when you were younger, something has to explain that missing chromosome of yours
no, brought up with no dad, since l was 10, 2 younger sisters, worked from 12 on the market and farms. l've done ten times more in my life that you will ever do, and i'm still waiting for you to nut me as you said you would like too. If i'm ignorant what are you ? You're a bitter twat like a few others on here, you've got a big mouth as well, keyboard warrior cunt.
 
no, brought up with no dad, since l was 10, 2 younger sisters, worked from 12 on the market and farms. l've done ten times more in my life that you will ever do, and i'm still waiting for you to nut me as you said you would like too. If i'm ignorant what are you ? You're a bitter twat like a few others on here, you've got a big mouth as well, keyboard warrior cunt.
Says a keyboard warrior...
 
Says a keyboard warrior...
i'll back anything l say face to face, so is that a keyboard warrior ? Put up then, you called it. What name dod you use on the last board ? Obviously too much of a prick to carry on with your previous name. Your shout.
 
i'll back anything l say face to face, so is that a keyboard warrior ? Put up then, you called it. What name dod you use on the last board ? Obviously too much of a prick to carry on with your previous name. Your shout.
Was a lurker before...
 
Back
Top