We obviously won't be offering him the same as he was on before.Salary.
The English is much nicer than the imported stuffSalary.
No shit.We obviously won't be offering him the same as he was on before.
How does an individual that you know of as;The ideal DOF for us. Do it!
Off the top of my head I can only pull three names that were players who moved into administration (there's probably loads more that I've forgotten).How does an individual that you know of as;
- a goalkeeper
- an heroic and compassionate person
….become an ideal candidate for a Director Of Football?
This is true. But I also think that if he hadn't left last summer, we would not be contemplating relegation going into our last game of the season.I don’t want him back as goalie, he isn’t what he was.
Good answer. ultimately I think he has formed a rare bond and friendship with the owning family which would make him good to have around in a number of potential roles as you would expect honesty and loyalty. Not subversive like others in roles of authority recentlyHe loved being here.
He is a big name in the game.
His credentials are much more that JR (who had none).
He and his dad have big reputations and contacts at all levels of the game
in England and abroad.
His game leadership was exactly what we have missed this season.
As the role of DOF is relatively new in England (name one) very few come
with a proven reputation.
His name offers some sort of cache here.
He is a known quantity.
He knows everybody here from the laundry to the owner.
He is educated, articulate, and has standards
I like him.
Sorry, DOF role, not FOFPersonally I'd prefer someone with top quality experience of appointing and subsequently managing managers, negotiating transfers, managing teams of scouts and analysts, and all the other aspects of the FOF role. We've tried the "I like him" route with JFR.
Complete and utter nonsense on every single fucking level.He loved being here.
He is a big name in the game.
His credentials are much more that JR (who had none).
He and his dad have big reputations and contacts at all levels of the game
in England and abroad.
His game leadership was exactly what we have missed this season.
As the role of DOF is relatively new in England (name one) very few come
with a proven reputation.
His name offers some sort of cache here.
He is a known quantity.
He knows everybody here from the laundry to the owner.
He is educated, articulate, and has standards
I like him.
If a youth team coach can become DoF at LCFC a long term international player, who won major club honours, and has worked with a selection of managers, who was strongly connected with the club and the family owning it, must be in with a shout. Not saying it's the right choice but I can't see how Rudkin would be better qualified.How does an individual that you know of as;
- a goalkeeper
- an heroic and compassionate person
….become an ideal candidate for a Director Of Football?
Employing him in a key role because 'he likes it here' and he and his dad might know a few people ?Pen4 - any prat can say that, reasons?
Top Fox, yes, a top proven man woud be ideal but we are who we are and not exactly shopping at Harrods...
Well there's two reasons that put him ahead of Rudkin for startersEmploying him in a key role because 'he likes it here' and he and his dad might know a few people ?
You've made no case, you've just listed a load of made up reasons because you like him, and then made a strawman argument (or is it tautological) that because of your made up reasons there are no better alternatives.Leaders thrive whatever their circumstances. If a man demonstrates it on the pitch he is likely to
not only provide it in an admin role but demand it of others.
I've made a case, where are all the better alternatives?
PS I did not say he 'likes it here' I said he loved it here.
We have seen how a man with few contacts has worked out.