Respect and Condolences to the Family of the Liverpool Bomber

How do you know that it was genuine ?
Why wouldn’t it be genuine?
Do you seriously think that 3 MPs were giving condolences to the family of a suicide bomber.
I despise Johnson but I assume it was a genuine blunder on his part. I’m not expecting an apology from him but at least one of them has held their hands up and admitted to having made a mistake.

Something you could perhaps try.
 
I find this thread astonishing.

For more than 20 years, the government of this country and all of the organs of the state have worked together importing tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals who have no regard to our culture and actually hate the indigenous population and want them dead. That is my view.

However any discussion about this is closed down and branded as islamaphobia.

The bollocks being talked about above, about who said what, who apologised and who did not, is trivial distraction.
 
I find this thread astonishing.

For more than 20 years, the government of this country and all of the organs of the state have worked together importing tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals who have no regard to our culture and actually hate the indigenous population and want them dead. That is my view.

However any discussion about this is closed down and branded as islamaphobia.

The bollocks being talked about above, about who said what, who apologised and who did not, is trivial distraction.
the mass movement of people is a Globalist agenda, thats an indisputable fact.

I've just watched that MP's comments, and l can't believe he didn't know what he was saying. It was to inflame l believe, then covered up with a "ooops a daisy".
 
I find this thread astonishing.

For more than 20 years, the government of this country and all of the organs of the state have worked together importing tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals who have no regard to our culture and actually hate the indigenous population and want them dead. That is my view.

However any discussion about this is closed down and branded as islamaphobia.

The bollocks being talked about above, about who said what, who apologised and who did not, is trivial distraction.
Islamophobia wasn't mentioned until you did.

Debates should always take place - the problem is many that bring certain issues up have already a deep-seated hatred of people of other cultures/skin colour in the first place (easily identifiable once the discussion develops), & are also happy/prefer not to consider crimes etc committed by people of their own background in the same vein.
 
Islamophobia wasn't mentioned until you did.

Debates should always take place - the problem is many that bring certain issues up have already a deep-seated hatred of people of other cultures/skin colour in the first place (easily identifiable once the discussion develops), & are also happy/prefer not to consider crimes etc committed by people of their own background in the same vein.
Morning Mm.

Islamaphobia is simply the 'catchall' phrase for the rhetoric used to shut down any debate on mass immigration.

As usual you make the assumption that this is to do with culture/skin colour which it is not, that is a racist viewpoint.

It is about people who do not belong in this country being encouraged to come here, with no checks or evaluation about the type of people they are or whether they are of value to the country. It is also about the fact that a serious number of recent arrivals are of criminal or murderous intent. The indigenous people neither want nor deserve this.

I have told you this before but I treat everyone the same and hold everyone to the same standards.

I make no differentiation in general terms.
 
Islamaphobia is simply the 'catchall' phrase for the rhetoric used to shut down any debate on mass immigration.

As usual you make the assumption that this is to do with culture/skin colour which it is not, that is a racist viewpoint.
I was speaking generally, not about the most recent incident.

But regarding the 2nd point & as mentioned before, it is interesting what emerges once the conversation develops. It’s as if that person cannot hold themselves back on their true feelings, & when this happens, it’s pretty obvious to everyone but themselves.
 
I was speaking generally, not about the most recent incident.

But regarding the 2nd point & as mentioned before, it is interesting what emerges once the conversation develops. It’s as if that person cannot hold themselves back on their true feelings, & when this happens, it’s pretty obvious to everyone but themselves.
Islamophobia wasn't mentioned until you did.

Debates should always take place - the problem is many that bring certain issues up have already a deep-seated hatred of people of other cultures/skin colour in the first place (easily identifiable once the discussion develops), & are also happy/prefer not to consider crimes etc committed by people of their own background in the same vein.
I'd say if there's a racist on here its you. You're the fucker who is always looking for it, in places it don't exist. Actually there is another who's does the same and we all know who that its eh.
 
I was speaking generally, not about the most recent incident.

But regarding the 2nd point & as mentioned before, it is interesting what emerges once the conversation develops. It’s as if that person cannot hold themselves back on their true feelings, & when this happens, it’s pretty obvious to everyone but themselves.
Once again you are the one bringing up colour and racism. You do it all the time.

So, one more time, "I treat everyone the same and hold everyone to the same standards".

Right now you are failing to meet any standards, your words are really quite disgraceful.
 
Once again you are the one bringing up colour and racism. You do it all the time.

So, one more time, "I treat everyone the same and hold everyone to the same standards".

Right now you are failing to meet any standards, your words are really quite disgraceful.
If you're choosing to take this personally or assuming it's directed at you, that's not the intention. But as you say, you are your own man so I can't control how you might interpret something even though in this instance, I'm telling you it's not how you should be.

If you want to make it about you, fill your boots.
 
Well we have an example of a christian suicide bomber.
Does their skin colour mean they're more likely to be a suicide bomber?
You've spent all your time talking about muslims, now you've conveniently changed to skin colour.
Does it matter if they're just a bomber or a suicide bomber, is one worse than the other?
 
Well we have an example of a christian suicide bomber.
Does their skin colour mean they're more likely to be a suicide bomber?
You've spent all your time talking about muslims, now you've conveniently changed to skin colour.
Does it matter if they're just a bomber or a suicide bomber, is one worse than the other?
He is not a Christian. He is a failed asylum seeker. He 'converted' to his new faith as a means of staying. He was on his way to cathedral to bow people up.


I have not switched to skin colour - I was responding to MM suggestion that some people choose to ignore similar crimes to those committed by Muslim extremists
 
Well we have an example of a christian suicide bomber.
Does their skin colour mean they're more likely to be a suicide bomber?
You've spent all your time talking about muslims, now you've conveniently changed to skin colour.
Does it matter if they're just a bomber or a suicide bomber, is one worse than the other?
Proof positive that socialism rots your brain.

The bomber is a criminal and a liar. He entered this country illegally, committed a knife crime and had several asylum applications refused. He should not have been here.

He was brought up a muslim but says he is a christian. Then goes on to attempt mass murder using a tactic almost exclusive to muslims.

An 8 year old can work this out.
 
Examples of white suicide bombers and organised rape gangs please......
Seems very weird to try and draw a distinction between these cunts. There are plenty of examples of both, and if we jump through your hoops and name them...then what? Does it make one group better/worse?

Very strange thought process imo.
 
Seems very weird to try and draw a distinction between these cunts. There are plenty of examples of both, and if we jump through your hoops and name them...then what? Does it make one group better/worse?

Very strange thought process imo.
Is there ?

Go through the list of UK suicide bombings, or homophobic knife murders. Plenty of Ahmeds - not many Smiths
 
You seem to be ignoring the rest of my message. What is to gain by comparing? Is one killer worse than the other based on their skin colour or surname?

As I know you like spoon feeding, give this a read and educate yourself:

(do you draw a distinction between suicide bomber, and non-suicide bomber? In your view is one worse than the other? Like to hear your logic on that.)


And I think it's probably best to move on from your rapist comparison, I think asking you to learn about the skin colour, and surnames, of perpetrators of systematic abuse of children will blow your mind.
 
You seem to be ignoring the rest of my message. What is to gain by comparing? Is one killer worse than the other based on their skin colour or surname?

As I know you like spoon feeding, give this a read and educate yourself:

(do you draw a distinction between suicide bomber, and non-suicide bomber? In your view is one worse than the other? Like to hear your logic on that.)


And I think it's probably best to move on from your rapist comparison, I think asking you to learn about the skin colour, and surnames, of perpetrators of systematic abuse of children will blow your mind.
Already read it thanks.

That Guy Fawkes was a really bad lad.

Meanwhile in the modern age and what is happening week by week now?

Nearly 50,000 currently being watched by Security Services. We all know which community the majority come from.
 
You seem to be ignoring the rest of my message. What is to gain by comparing? Is one killer worse than the other based on their skin colour or surname?

As I know you like spoon feeding, give this a read and educate yourself:

(do you draw a distinction between suicide bomber, and non-suicide bomber? In your view is one worse than the other? Like to hear your logic on that.)


And I think it's probably best to move on from your rapist comparison, I think asking you to learn about the skin colour, and surnames, of perpetrators of systematic abuse of children will blow your mind.
'Jihadist material including bomb making instructions and execution videos gets more clicks in the UK than in any other European nation'
 
You seem to be ignoring the rest of my message. What is to gain by comparing? Is one killer worse than the other based on their skin colour or surname?

As I know you like spoon feeding, give this a read and educate yourself:

(do you draw a distinction between suicide bomber, and non-suicide bomber? In your view is one worse than the other? Like to hear your logic on that.)


And I think it's probably best to move on from your rapist comparison, I think asking you to learn about the skin colour, and surnames, of perpetrators of systematic abuse of children will blow your mind.
  • 2021, 15 October: Sir David Amess, Conservative MP for Southend West, was stabbed to death while attending a constituency surgery. Ali Harbi Ali, a British citizen of Somali ancestry was arrested under the Terrorism Act..[116]
 
Already read it thanks.

That Guy Fawkes was a really bad lad.

Meanwhile in the modern age and what is happening week by week now?

Nearly 50,000 currently being watched by Security Services. We all know which community the majority come from.
This one is good.

20 months for possessing explosive substances . 20 months lol.
  • 2019, 31 August: Anwar Driouich from Middlesbrough was arrested in North London and "charged with one offence of possessing an explosive substance and seven offences of possessing a document likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism". He was sentenced to 20 months in prison.
 
MI5 and 6 CIA and MOSSAD controlled all these modern day heroes.

Funny how we only have one sort at a time innit..
 
This one is good.

20 months for possessing explosive substances . 20 months lol.
  • 2019, 31 August: Anwar Driouich from Middlesbrough was arrested in North London and "charged with one offence of possessing an explosive substance and seven offences of possessing a document likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism". He was sentenced to 20 months in prison.
Plumbing the depths, using people's deaths to prove a point and show what you really are. I wouldn't imagine that anyone slightly on the fence of being radicalised is quite easy to sway the wrong way when shown attitudes like yours.
 
Back
Top