There is a significant difference between Hamas in particular (and, to some extent, other Palestinian organisations) on one hand, and the Israeli state and government on the other hand.
Hamas is an islamistic terror organisation. Its core is antisemitic, they want to destroy Israel, and they are more akin to an islamist death cult (e.g. ISIS/Daesh). They operate through violence, and they cannot be voted out. Fatah and its leader Abbas were elected but had power ripped from them by Hamas, and Abbas has not dared to run another election for fifteen years or so. I don't think "Palestine" has anything resembling a constitution, and the various chartas (PLO, Hamas) also dispute the right of Israel's existence. Hamas is very much corrupt. I'm not sure what would happen if somebody in Gaza demonstrated for peace with Israel!
Israel, on the other hand, is a democratic state, Western style. For all its weaknesses and mistakes, it has mechanisms to correct them. Netanyahu (I don't know too much about him, to be honest) can be voted out. There are courts of law. They have a functioning economy. They have excellent universities. They have a reasonably free press. They allow for and have a peace movement with Palestine. And so on and so on.
If I had to make a choice, there is no question where I wanted to live.
I don't agree to this "both sides" balance argument which is coming across in #22 and #23! The conflict and the systemic positions are, as far as the above positions are concerned, very much imbalanced. Which is another problem in resolving the conflict but which is also the reason I very much side with Israel these days (it hasn't always been like that).