Food for thought

Club_B00k_Crutchless said:
Why would I do that, knowing some people would stoop so low as to insult them when they run out of ideas to have a debate?

No idea. You just wade in when your buddies are flailing around and running out of ideas and resorting to petty insults.
Click to expand...
If you don't know what my argument is, why make a definitive statement about it?
 
BigDave said:
A lot of hot air, emotion, accusation and unbalanced thinking.

I don't want to insult anyone's wife, anyone's buddies or deny that folks on here are into cuntish behavior. Cuntish behavior is part of the mix, buddy.

Let's think about a guy. He likes arguing and does it on a website where he's fallen out with people. He thinks he can post a bunch of personal stuff on one public forum and thinks no one can read it from another forum. He thinks no one might be 'cuntish' and chip a few balls back at him.
Strange way of thinking.

If that guy wrote to me complaining about it, I'd say his complaint shows no ownership of poor decision making.

I'd tell that guy that I'd be happy if we could all get along, but that's difficult when people don't take ownership, and worse, accuse others of lying.

With the past, my problem is that someone has the words. The words are fixed. And no amount of hot air and denial is going to change them.

There are 2 main instigators of reporting the site. Reporting the site, one 'radicalized' poster and the admin to 'the authorities.'.
Cuntish behavior?
We don't appear to have any angels using this site.

What else?
A few people are into sharing pictures of certain users and making comments on their physical appearance. Can't say I'm bothered, but it's a bit freaky. I'm glad that no one shared any pictures of me and my children.
Okay, it was done in private, between a small group, but how would that complaining guy feel about people doing this with him and his family?
I'm guessing he wouldn't be happy.

The words show that trying to get someone to blow up is the most consistent theme. It goes on for weeks, months, more than a year.

Many phrases suggest that popcorn eating is a good activity when provoking the crazy guy and watching him blow up.

So, here we are again. The words are just words. They don't want to hurt anyone, but like I said, they are fixed.

I wish anyone who reads this, a good day. Instead of being cuntish, we could try to take ownership and move on.
Click to expand...
You are RubberDoug Buddy and I claim my Five Canadian Dollars buddy.
 
BigDave said:
I wish anyone who reads this, a good day. Instead of being cuntish, we could try to take ownership and move on.
Click to expand...
Well who brought it all up again?

BigDave said:
Let's think about a guy. He likes arguing and does it on a website where he's fallen out with people. He thinks he can post a bunch of personal stuff on one public forum and thinks no one can read it from another forum. He thinks no one might be 'cuntish' and chip a few balls back at him.
Click to expand...
All a bit whataboutery.

"If you don't know what my argument is, why make a definitive statement about it?"

My initial said arguments, ie more than one. Like this one, when you decide to wade in, in defence of your buddies.

You seem to be using something from almost 3 years ago (we could try to take ownership and move on) to justify your buddy's personal remarks about someone who has no skin in the game.
 
Club_B00k_Crutchless said:
Well who brought it all up again?


All a bit whataboutery.

"If you don't know what my argument is, why make a definitive statement about it?"

My initial said arguments, ie more than one. Like this one, when you decide to wade in, in defence of your buddies.

You seem to be using something from almost 3 years ago (we could try to take ownership and move on) to justify your buddy's personal remarks about someone who has no skin in the game.
Click to expand...
'Wade in'. Is this your collective, slanted terminology??

🤣
 
Club_B00k_Crutchless said:
Well who brought it all up again?


All a bit whataboutery.

"If you don't know what my argument is, why make a definitive statement about it?"

My initial said arguments, ie more than one. Like this one, when you decide to wade in, in defence of your buddies.

You seem to be using something from almost 3 years ago (we could try to take ownership and move on) to justify your buddy's personal remarks about someone who has no skin in the game.
Click to expand...
My point here is very specific.
You can get offended if you want.
Get annoyed by my input and call it wading in.
Say I'm defending a buddy.

I'm more like pointing out the incredibly dumb decision making that led both of you to make your complaints.

Why did I reply?

Just remember, as an admin professional, I take those complaints very seriously. 😆
 
Fuck, if anyone ever shared pictures of my children on this board I’d have no hesitation of punching them in the face next time I saw them. In fact I’d go out of my way to punch the cunts in the face.
 
Club_B00k_Crutchless said:
Bless, all wading in now.
Click to expand...
Forget the wading buddy, let's get this done with.
I don't know how we get round the photo sharing stuff, but you and your pals can't have a problem with the informing and the provoking stuff.
What do you say?
CBook?
Hackney?
Golfer? Foxonwater
Daz?
NWFox?
Sardinia?
Hardaass?
 
jackieguaccamo said:
Fuck, if anyone ever shared pictures of my children on this board I’d have no hesitation of punching them in the face next time I saw them. In fact I’d go out of my way to punch the cunts in the face.
Click to expand...
More fake outrage. Before you burst a blood vessel you might want to consider whether sharing photos already in the public domain is worth the high blood pressure.

Weren't you the one that stole someone's profile picture off Facebook and used it as yours on here?
 
Club_B00k_Crutchless said:
More fake outrage. Before you burst a blood vessel you might want to consider whether sharing photos already in the public domain is worth the high blood pressure.

Weren't you the one that stole someone's profile picture off Facebook and used it as yours on here?
Click to expand...
Fake outrage? No I’m serious. If it were my kids I’d be fucking raging.
 
soupsandwich said:
I Like this, you're a different type of twat, one who knows when to draw the line and has a genuine sense of humour and self deprecation. Unlike the hardline twats and unapologetic "disrespectful cunts"
Click to expand...
Not only do I not give a flying fuck about your opinion on me Id also like to add that a soup sandwich is not just undesirable it’s impractical with or without crutrons whatever the flavour.
 
BigDave said:
Forget the wading buddy, let's get this done with.
I don't know how we get round the photo sharing stuff, but you and your pals can't have a problem with the informing and the provoking stuff.
What do you say?
CBook?
Hackney?
Golfer? Foxonwater
Daz?
NWFox?
Sardinia?
Hardaass?
Click to expand...

CBook
Hackney
Golfer? Foxonwater
Daz?
NWFox
Sardinia
Hardaass

Fuck me, not exactly the A Team 😂
I’ve forgotten now, what did hardaass say about the roof fanzine?
 
BigDave said:
Forget the wading buddy, let's get this done with.
I don't know how we get round the photo sharing stuff, but you and your pals can't have a problem with the informing and the provoking stuff.
What do you say?
CBook?
Hackney?
Golfer? Foxonwater
Daz?
NWFox?
Sardinia?
Hardaass?
Click to expand...
they'll never comment unless they are in their safe place.
 
hackneyfox said:
Well I have never tried to do that, have disagreed and argued but never ganged up on anyone,
Click to expand...
In response to accusations of goading a guy. Goading a guy who you think is mad, on the brink, no way back and is gonna explode and commit a terrible act.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top