Brauny
The optimistic pessimist
Coward and a liarShut up big nose and go back to the happy clappy forum.
Coward and a liarShut up big nose and go back to the happy clappy forum.
Obviously it's ok else the largest minority in the country wouldn't have voted for him.Is "piccaninnies" and "watermelon smiles" OK? Just asking for Boris.
ConkCoward and a liar
CowardConk
Honk honkCoward
Apologies, I thought you quoted ME when you responded.It's not all about you Dickie, the freedom of speech was referring to a post a couple below yours. Can't be arsed to quote them all.
And you'll find it's the "snowflakes" taking the knee that are the ones accepting equality. It's the ones who take umbrage at any sort of challenge to their privilege and comfort who are the snowflakes as they can't bear their position being challenged because people dare to want to be treated equally.
Sun readerCoward
Therein lies the problem. I am told that “black” is unacceptable in these times. I have to say though, that when I just asked a black man, he said he didnt give a toss.black isn't offensive astley. in fact, reading reports today, it's the preferred term.
And that's why you are liar, go and read those posts again. My post was about the imbalance of TV programs, at no stage did I say i read The Sun.Sun reader
Liar, you read the Sun. I can remember when dirty old men like you would hide the Sun in a porno mag when they took it to the counter. You actually take umbridge that national news programmes don't show the Suns angle on anything. That's because the Sun is a comic for retarded people.And that's why you are liar, go and read those posts again. My post was about the imbalance of TV programs, at no stage did I say i read The Sun.
Then you inferred a racial slur, of which you were too much of a coward to explain your comments when asked to clarify.
That's largely accurate and true for the USA. But this is not the USA. This is the UK. The UK has no history of black slavery (at least not in the UK itself) or of segregation and 'Jim Crow' laws. That being the case, "coloured" should not have the power to offend and there should be no reason why people should find it offensive - especially in this case since the context within which it was used was clearly (to any reasonable person) not intended to cause offence in any way. Or do we have to import all our 'cultural sensitivities' from the US?Things change with time but some people don't, or won't. Why not speak to people and ask them about their experiences. Take some time to read stuff that doesn't reinforce what you already believe?
View attachment 358View attachment 359
Your making it up as you go along aren't you dickhead. Just lies and inaccurate assumptions. You can't even point to a single post I have done which backs you up. Your just plain and simply a fucking liar.Liar, you read the Sun. I can remember when dirty old men like you would hide the Sun in a porno mag when they took it to the counter. You actually take umbridge that national news programmes don't show the Suns angle on anything. That's because the Sun is a comic for retarded people.
That's largely accurate and true for the USA. But this is not the USA. This is the UK. The UK has no history of black slavery (at least not in the UK itself) or of segregation and 'Jim Crow' laws. That being the case, "coloured" should not have the power to offend and there should be no reason why people should find it offensive - especially in this case since the context within which it was used was clearly (to any reasonable person) not intended to cause offence in any way. Or do we have to import all our 'cultural sensitivities' from the US?
Here"s an article from the UK. As fa's as I'm aware the preferred term here is black. I was just posting an example of why colored considered offensive.Why do "people of colour" want to be referred to as "black" ?
Proved my point that you are a liarGet back to your own board and take your paper for thickos with you.
You still here?Proved my point that you are a liar