That was me did the linking.For spreading COVID misinformation.
Some on here were linking his speech to parliament a while back.
They'll no doubt now cry that the Tory chief whip is in cahoots with " Big Pharma."
Can't recall the speech I linked mentioning the holocaust.And linking it to the Holocaust.
Did anyone say it was antiemetic? Starmer didn’t, generally pointed as being deeply offensive to compare it to the holocaust.He tweeted that a cardiologist told him it was the biggest crime against humanity since the holocaust.
Can someone please explain why this is classed as antisemitic as I genuinely dont know.
Itv news use the word and showed the tweetDid anyone say it was antiemetic? Starmer didn’t, generally pointed as being deeply offensive to compare it to the holocaust.
Can you link the tweet as I’ve not seen it.Itv news use the word and showed the tweet
Which takes me back to my first post on this threadSeems it was Sunak and Handoncock
At Prime Minister’s Questions, Rishi Sunak condemned Mr Bridgen’s remarks as “utterly unacceptable” telling the Commons he was “determined that the scourge of anti-Semitism is eradicated”.
Matt Hancock, a former health secretary, hit out at the “disgusting, anti-Semitic, anti-vax conspiracy theories” at Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday. Mr Hancock said the comments were “deeply offensive” and “have no place in this House or in our wider society”.
Trying to get in first with a woke response so it looks like Labour are anti-semitic, as they have been accused of in the recent past. Just succeeded in making themselves look stupid again.Tory party trying to get out of trouble by mentioning antisemitism and hoping that will drag Labour into it in some people’s minds?
WHAT?Tory party trying to get out of trouble by mentioning antisemitism and hoping that will drag Labour into it in some people’s minds?