DagenhamFox
Blue Roofer
This whole article is about the panel who review contentious decisions and whether they feel the laws were correctly applied.
It’s bonkers.
For many it’s 3 for and 2 against so even now after the incident they still can’t be fully sure.
And this whole thing about whether it was a clear and obvious error and therefore whether the VAR should be involved is a joke.
Just let the referee and if needed their assistants review the footage pitch side if they are unsure of a decision, and let’s get on with the game.
www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c3g8ejvezv3o
It’s bonkers.
For many it’s 3 for and 2 against so even now after the incident they still can’t be fully sure.
And this whole thing about whether it was a clear and obvious error and therefore whether the VAR should be involved is a joke.
Just let the referee and if needed their assistants review the footage pitch side if they are unsure of a decision, and let’s get on with the game.
www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c3g8ejvezv3o