It's not weird, it's the sort of detail which separates the top clubs and the would be's.
Despite adopting a man to man system we still don't get up and win a share of incomings.
In many ways, Kane was the vital difference between the sides, which is not to say it was avoidable as we have experienced players out.
Another difference was that we lost out in many individual tussles on strength, our lads proving lightweight.
BR's analysis of naiviety was right but you have to ask why. The answer is there was nobody in charge, like an orchestra without a conductor.
To see any experienced player deciding to chase a win when a point was there for the taking is disappointing to say the least.