The Time Traveller

Let's say you're correct,

By what mechanism do you think he'll achieve victory?

Genuinely curious, because I can't see at this point how he overturns the certified results?
 
BarrowFox said:
Let's say you're correct,

By what mechanism do you think he'll achieve victory?

Genuinely curious, because I can't see at this point how he overturns the certified results?
Click to expand...
I really couldn't give a fuck who wins, I think we're fucked either way, but even the most one-eyed democrat must doubt that Joe Biden is the most voted for president in the history of American elections. That alone would make me a little suspicious of the voting system, plus the fact that the democrats were really pushing the postal voting. I dunno, theres something dodgy going on.
 
jackieguaccamo said:
I really couldn't give a fuck who wins, I think we're fucked either way, but even the most one-eyed democrat must doubt that Joe Biden is the most voted for president in the history of American elections. That alone would make me a little suspicious of the voting system, plus the fact that the democrats were really pushing the postal voting. I dunno, theres something dodgy going on.
Click to expand...
i Agree something dodgy is going on, I'm guessing its a different view to your own.

it could just be that your personal opinion of Biden isn't shared by the majority of voting Americans.


the postal vote thing is definitely interesting, although i think you have it the wrong way around.

Some states made it easier to use a postal vote, but the salient point is that some republican ran states specifically set the rules that postal votes would only be counted after in person votes were counted. setting up a situation manufactured by Trump and republicans to delay vote counting of predominately Democrat votes.

Trump then began pushing a narrative that postal votes were fraudulent (except in Florida)

Thereby setting up a situation that allowed trump to claim he had won (before postal votes were counted in swing states)

In my opinion Trumps only reason for pushing the fraud narrative is to get more cash from his marks, over $200 million so far with only $14 million spent on legal fees, a nice little earner

either way, someone will be the next president, as it stands that's going to be Biden
 
BarrowFox said:
i Agree something dodgy is going on, I'm guessing its a different view to your own.

it could just be that your personal opinion of Biden isn't shared by the majority of voting Americans.


the postal vote thing is definitely interesting, although i think you have it the wrong way around.

Some states made it easier to use a postal vote, but the salient point is that some republican ran states specifically set the rules that postal votes would only be counted after in person votes were counted. setting up a situation manufactured by Trump and republicans to delay vote counting of predominately Democrat votes.

Trump then began pushing a narrative that postal votes were fraudulent (except in Florida)

Thereby setting up a situation that allowed trump to claim he had won (before postal votes were counted in swing states)

In my opinion Trumps only reason for pushing the fraud narrative is to get more cash from his marks, over $200 million so far with only $14 million spent on legal fees, a nice little earner

either way, someone will be the next president, as it stands that's going to be Biden
Click to expand...
I don't think you can trust the MSM, Biden and the brown lady have just won Time person of the year. What for?
 
jackieguaccamo said:
What. I'm saying you are basing your info on the msm, i'm not so sure I trust them, hence mentioning the Time person of the year, like Barry winning the nobel peace prize for absolutely nothing.
Click to expand...

No, your changing the subject to avoid addressing the points I raised.

You're also making an incorrect assumption on the sources of the info.

Quite what the cover of time has to do with this I'm unsure, apart from whataboutery.
 
BarrowFox said:
No, your changing the subject to avoid addressing the points I raised.

You're also making an incorrect assumption on the sources of the info.

Quite what the cover of time has to do with this I'm unsure, apart from whataboutery.
Click to expand...
Look, I think something is amiss, I'm not looking to prove you wrong, or me right, it's just my thoughts.
 
jackieguaccamo said:
Exactly, so lets not force our opinions on each other. I don't want to change your views, I like people having different opinions, it's healthy and educational.
Click to expand...
Coming at things from a different angle is all good.

Don't mistake someone challenging your views as forcing opinions on you though.
 
BarrowFox said:
Coming at things from a different angle is all good.

Don't mistake someone challenging your views as forcing opinions on you though.
Click to expand...
Yes I understand, but I'm not challenging your views, I like that we have different views, there's not enough of that these days. I'm sure if we were sitting round a table having a beer it would be even better.
 
BarrowFox said:
Let's say you're correct,

By what mechanism do you think he'll achieve victory?

Genuinely curious, because I can't see at this point how he overturns the certified results?
Click to expand...
how can you comment or even hold a thought on something you have no idea about ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top