Rolf Harris dead!

The caant died on 10th May. And he's already had his funeral.
They kept all that very quiet.
I wonder why?
 
that's why he didn't have an agent. i thought even you would be able to put 2+2 together (oh wait).
No agent Bud, okay. But family could have easily announced his death. It's what happens when retired actors, without agents, die.
So I'll do the math for you again. Family could've announced death. Didn't. Probably because of what JG wrote.

Try to think a bit more. (oh wait)
 
No agent Bud, okay. But family could have easily announced his death. It's what happens when retired actors, without agents, die.
So I'll do the math for you again. Family could've announced death. Didn't. Probably because of what JG wrote.

Try to think a bit more. (oh wait)
you guys in the conspiracy club love to jump to each others defence unless you're all just the same person.
2+2 = he didn't have an agent because he is a convicted sex offender.
Can you let us know what the rubberdoug time limit is for announcing deaths and why it's important, so it can be passed on to everybody for future reference? wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of the 'free thinkers'.
 
you guys in the conspiracy club love to jump to each others defence unless you're all just the same person.
2+2 = he didn't have an agent because he is a convicted sex offender.
Can you let us know what the rubberdoug time limit is for announcing deaths and why it's important, so it can be passed on to everybody for future reference? wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of the 'free thinkers'.
I reckon your fucking brain died some time around 2001.

 
you're just proving my point with every post, again and again and again and again.
dunning-kruger proven again.

So fuck nut, prey tell, what is mis information?
Biden telling everyone the jab is safe and you won’t get covid from it.
You and the other retards have been telling us all about the make up of your gene pool expecting sympathy. Then insist everyone should get jabbed.
Some gene pools deserve to be no more

 
you guys in the conspiracy club love to jump to each others defence unless you're all just the same person.
2+2 = he didn't have an agent because he is a convicted sex offender.
Can you let us know what the rubberdoug time limit is for announcing deaths and why it's important, so it can be passed on to everybody for future reference? wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of the 'free thinkers'.
This is just getting weird. Kudos to you though for not writing about masterbation this time. Good job!
 
you guys in the conspiracy club love to jump to each others defence unless you're all just the same person.
2+2 = he didn't have an agent because he is a convicted sex offender.
Can you let us know what the rubberdoug time limit is for announcing deaths and why it's important, so it can be passed on to everybody for future reference? wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of the 'free thinkers'.
Who knows how free our thoughts are? Probably, not very.
You seem very agitated though. It's a bit like reading that Golfer Gang interchange.
Free or not, I'm okay with the way I think feel.

Why not try to be happier? 😃😎
 
Actually we are being semi polite to someone who condones raping kids.

He's a very sick puppy.
 
Who knows how free our thoughts are? Probably, not very.
You seem very agitated though. It's a bit like reading that Golfer Gang interchange.
Free or not, I'm okay with the way I think feel.

Why not try to be happier? 😃😎
I'm not sure why every time somebody disagrees with you you imply they must be agitated?
you want people to think for themselves but when they do they must be agitated?? why can't you just agree to disagree. why imply incorrectly that your written drivel is winding them up. seems to be more about not being able to accept people think calmly and clearly in a different way to you than getting to an objective truth.
I'm having a reet good laugh at some of the responses.
 
I'm not sure why every time somebody disagrees with you you imply they must be agitated?
you want people to think for themselves but when they do they must be agitated?? why can't you just agree to disagree. why imply incorrectly that your written drivel is winding them up. seems to be more about not being able to accept people think calmly and clearly in a different way to you than getting to an objective truth.
I'm having a reet good laugh at some of the responses.
Yeah, like I really thought it was ME who was winding you up. 😃
Keep up with the assumptions Muz.
 
Back
Top