No it was the correct decision but he shouldn't have needed help to make. ItIt’s Live erpoo fukum
But it’s an awful decision
Behave. His foot rolled over the ball due to momentum. Yhere was zero intent.No it was the correct decision but he shouldn't have needed help to make. It
Intent is irrelevant under the law.Behave. His foot rolled over the ball due to momentum. Yhere was zero intent.
And where in the LOTG does it say there has to be intentBehave. His foot rolled over the ball due to momentum. Yhere was zero intent.
Correct and also buckin rightIntent is irrelevant under the law.
Sounds like me in a curry house on a Satdee nightAnd where in the LOTG does it say there has to be intent
Three criteria are
Reckless Tick
Endangered an opponents safety Tick
Not in control of his body Tick
Absolute stonewall red, even the ref accepted he was wrong to give a yellow
And me later tonightSounds like me in a curry house on a Satdee night