“Subscribe

We shouldn’t question science

bnet

Season Ticket Holder
put "follow the science" in front or behind any comment and these daft cunts think its "fact", - can't figure out liars lie.
 

AFCDorset

Season Ticket Holder
Correct. But it's usually questioned and other points put forward by peer reviewed work, not some bloke on Bitchute.
When the 'peers' will not review your work because they are scared to have their careers ruined and their lives cancelled, the journals will not publish and your study disappears down the memory hole.

This is exactly what any scientist with views contrary to the narrative has to deal with, when even Facebook and Twitter censor you, your options become very limited.
 

Richardvanles

Season Ticket Holder
Science is entirely based on questioning science.
So why when anyone questions anything to do with covid are they either conspiracy nutters, bitchute nutters, anti vax nutters, discredited doctor nutters, right wing nutters…
It seems to me that (as with Corbyn) there’s an organised orchestrated attack on anything or anyone that questions the narrative.
As I’ve said a number of times. This vaccine could be the saviour but it could be the downfall. Or it could make not one shiny shit of difference. But we’re happily marching down the one road with no signposts warning you of any dangers ahead and potentially a cliff at the end of it.
 

sixthswan

Don't Welch
Scientists have questioned each other, over the science.
Because science is based on questions and evidence; you are bound to get differing views.
If any scientist is TELLING people to do something, or not to do it - then they are nutters.
Any scientist who pushed the Covid agenda too far is a nutter. Any scientist who pushes back too far against the Covid agenda is a nutter.
Science should only ever offer advice, never judgement or compulsion.
 

Richardvanles

Season Ticket Holder
Scientists have questioned each other, over the science.
Because science is based on questions and evidence; you are bound to get differing views.
If any scientist is TELLING people to do something, or not to do it - then they are nutters.
Any scientist who pushed the Covid agenda too far is a nutter. Any scientist who pushes back too far against the Covid agenda is a nutter.
Science should only ever offer advice, never judgement or compulsion.
Agreed, but somehow politics and science have entwined in this one. The rhetoric of “if you’re not with me you’re against me” has become the agenda of covid science and that in itself is a dangerous road to go down.
Paying celebs to push the vax agenda. Dismissing any questioning of the vaccine.
Removing any opposite view from social media platforms.
It’s a dangerous road to travel.
 

sixthswan

Don't Welch
Politics is the issue. Not the science.
I agree with you about the celebs pushing agendas and questioning should be allowed with anything, not just vaccines.
Unfortunately though it isn't just the politicians at fault. Some of the anti Covid stuff is just plain bonkers. People are making cash out of alternative views.
Which is also a dangerous road to travel.
Don't trust the views of anybody else. Trust your own gut.
 

bnet

Season Ticket Holder
"peer reviewed". another lie to compound a previous lie. I'd love to flog you daft fuckers some magic beans.
 

bnet

Season Ticket Holder
Scientists have questioned each other, over the science.
Because science is based on questions and evidence; you are bound to get differing views.
If any scientist is TELLING people to do something, or not to do it - then they are nutters.
Any scientist who pushed the Covid agenda too far is a nutter. Any scientist who pushes back too far against the Covid agenda is a nutter.
Science should only ever offer advice, never judgement or compulsion.
its actually based on funding, so the funders only get the results that makes them money eventually.

Always remember the golden rule, Follow the Money !
 

bnet

Season Ticket Holder
Heres an example of how the world is not all fluffy bunny rabbits for CCC.

I know top scientist who through the work he as done is beating cancer in people in 2 to 3 months with ketogenic's. He told me around 3 years ago that his work will not be published for 5 to 10 years if it doesn't get supressed. Now something as important as that is going to be hidden, then you know that it is going to effect someones bottom line if published so for the sake of money the science is kept from the world.
 
“Subscribe
“Subscribe
Top