Truth

Or you could be simply looking too deep into things that aren't there. Wake up and smell the coffee mate.
give me a list of acceptable sources please Daz - quick as you like, you must have then at your finger tips because you know which are not credible instantaneously ??????

This post WILL be ignored or side stepped as the last time l ask was.
 
a quick observation, where is the secret ingredient that is marked as "secret" on the patents ?

By the way, if l had time and could be bothered, l could point out hell of a lot more that are not listed and are not even Classe as "secret". You will believe anything if it looks like its written in a scientific way obviously.

I'll give you a couple of other things NOT to think about. Who's pushing this "get jabbed". agenda ? and who owns the patents to the product that issuing sold to the governments (tax payers money) ? Would be shocked if l told you the answer is, the, governments ? No, you will deny it.

How does it go ? oh yeh - 'FOLLOW THE MONEY"..

too simple hough ain't it. You just won't ask yourself the right questions and you'll ignore or try to discredit anything you don't with the programme given to you to stay ignorant, and try and tell others "its all ok, the government loves us". I'll tell you one thing and you will eventually get to understand it all, the worlds governments are waging war on its own people. Does Boris and all the other evil bastards EVER tell the truth? you know the answer don't you !!!!
This is exactly what we are talking about people give you a reasonable explanation and you immediately rubbish it yet you ask us to read and learn the stuff you send. You are so entrenched in your way of thinking that you are unwilling to see anything else. It's almost like your a sheep and just following one path of thought.
 
Why would 2 universities do reattach, publish their research of which if it was untrue could be sued and even closed down if it was made risk that, for what, why ? When you are adult enough to seriously look for the truth it will appear, but you are too busy defending bullshit because you are looking silly. You are not interested in the facts, just your own ego.

I'll add the Tavistock Institute for your research list, of which you will ignore, because you don't want to know.. You daft twats collectively are practicing the "tall poppy syndrome" and a few seriously thick posters just nod and agree because if they could ever understand the truth their sad lives would be in tatters.

Take a step back and you WILL see the truth, whether you want to admit any of it to yourself or not, is another massive issue.
The myth about graphene oxide in vaccines seems to have originated with a Spanish study claiming that, using transmission electron microscopy (a microscopy technique which allows particularly fine details and structures to be seen), a solution created from a vial of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine takes a similar form to graphene oxide.
However there are many issues with this research, which has not been published in a scientific journal or peer reviewed.
Firstly, the provenance of the vial is unknown. We don’t know whether it was a vial of the vaccine, and fact checkers Health Feedback report that the person who sent the vial to the researcher is known to spread anti-vaccine content.
Secondly, the study says the findings are not “conclusive evidence” for the presence of graphene oxide in the vaccine.
While the researcher is a professor at the University of Almeria, the university has distanced itself from the work, saying it is “unofficial report by a university professor about an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with total lack of traceability”.

It would appear that that you are blinkered so much that you do not seem to be able to consider science, or simple maths and prefer to be only informed by amateur quacks and conspiracy theorists from the uneducated corners of the web. Your choice. Time will tell who is right.
But you can't deny simple science and maths, so there is no question to argue about the two points I am saying you are wrong on.

You'll note that I haven't participated in your Russiagate thread as I don't have the knowledge, experience or in fact interest to make any valid comment.

Also, a bit confused by the importance of the Tavistock Institute. They seem to be accepting Coronovirus as a fact of life to be dealt with - Nothing controversial to be seen unless you have got a specific item you wish us to refer to. Please enlighten us.
 
FUCKSAKE !

you do not understand a thing I've posted do you.

Keep trying to prove black is white.

Follow the money.

Whats Evian spelled backwards ?
 
This is exactly what we are talking about people give you a reasonable explanation and you immediately rubbish it yet you ask us to read and learn the stuff you send. You are so entrenched in your way of thinking that you are unwilling to see anything else. It's almost like your a sheep and just following one path of thought.
Have you got me a list of acceptable sources yet Daz, what's taking so long ?

You made 3 posts since l ask and not one mention of this crucial information I'd like that you obviously have at your finger tips !!
 
Perhaps some of the others in the gang could help you out if you all of a sudden forgot eh ?

Doubt it....
 
I've just re-read a quickly some of this thread and to sum it up, its about the same as every other thread.

Its a load of dummies repeating "NO IT AIN'T" over and over..
 
a quick observation, where is the secret ingredient that is marked as "secret" on the patents ?

By the way, if l had time and could be bothered, l could point out hell of a lot more that are not listed and are not even Classe as "secret". You will believe anything if it looks like its written in a scientific way obviously.

I'll give you a couple of other things NOT to think about. Who's pushing this "get jabbed". agenda ? and who owns the patents to the product that issuing sold to the governments (tax payers money) ? Would be shocked if l told you the answer is, the, governments ? No, you will deny it.

How does it go ? oh yeh - 'FOLLOW THE MONEY"..

too simple hough ain't it. You just won't ask yourself the right questions and you'll ignore or try to discredit anything you don't with the programme given to you to stay ignorant, and try and tell others "its all ok, the government loves us". I'll tell you one thing and you will eventually get to understand it all, the worlds governments are waging war on its own people. Does Boris and all the other evil bastards EVER tell the truth? you know the answer don't you !!!!
We will just have to agree to disagree. What you state in post is all conspiracy theory. Its not something that you can prove or deny, at least yet.
I think it is established beyond doubt that Boris is a serial liar, and no one is disputing that. Its also pretty obvious that the Government is winging it on this latest variant, and probably have been a lot during the pandemic. They also saw and grasped the opportunity to line theirs and their mates' pockets. No one is saying that the Government loves us.
Governments from other countries have exhibited differing ways to try to control (or not) the virus.
My questions are:
1. How do such a bunch of inept and un-coordinated chancers manage to coordinate all this world domination plan when they are so useless?
2. If they wanted to de-populate, why didn't they just stand back et the virus take its course?
3. Why would global Governments willingly spaff so much money getting themselves into record levels of debt?
 
its actually a - conspiracy "fact".

Do you know who invented the phrase "conspiracy theorists" ?

It was the CIA to try and discredit anyone who could see the truth about who killed JFK, they actually were in serious trouble with the people because it was obvious not a crazed lone gunman to most of the world.

1. stop it !
2. because its the jab that is the slow killer, they have to get you to take the jab and people will die over a period of time. Its boiling the frog tactic ffs.
3. The governments own the jab of which they are taking the tax dollar/pound and paying their companies for it. The whole idea is to collapse the worlds economy as well. Of which is well on the way, so if you ignore this bit you will have no money left in the bank when its done. Why do you think everyone is getting out of cash ? basics ffs.

I now understand you total naivety on these subjects and why you can't grasp any of it. You need the basics, whether you could ever get a hold of them is up to you, thats actually whether you even want too. On that point, there seems to be no point banging my head against the wall with you.
I'm still looking for an answer on the "credible sources" which none of you seem willing to provide. Its funny how you know all know which are not credible ? surely its an exercise in deduction, no ?
 
FUCKSAKE !

you do not understand a thing I've posted do you.

Keep trying to prove black is white.

Follow the money.

Whats Evian spelled backwards

We will just have to agree to disagree. What you state in post is all conspiracy theory. Its not something that you can prove or deny, at least yet.
I think it is established beyond doubt that Boris is a serial liar, and no one is disputing that. Its also pretty obvious that the Government is winging it on this latest variant, and probably have been a lot during the pandemic. They also saw and grasped the opportunity to line theirs and their mates' pockets. No one is saying that the Government loves us.
Governments from other countries have exhibited differing ways to try to control (or not) the virus.
My questions are:
1. How do such a bunch of inept and un-coordinated chancers manage to coordinate all this world domination plan when they are so useless?
2. If they wanted to de-populate, why didn't they just stand back et the virus take its course?
3. Why would global Governments willingly spaff so much money getting themselves into record levels of debt?
This is exactly my thinking Northwest I think the pandemic is real BUT the government have milked it for everything it's worth.
 
its actually a - conspiracy "fact".

Do you know who invented the phrase "conspiracy theorists" ?

It was the CIA to try and discredit anyone who could see the truth about who killed JFK, they actually were in serious trouble with the people because it was obvious not a crazed lone gunman to most of the world.

1. stop it !
2. because its the jab that is the slow killer, they have to get you to take the jab and people will die over a period of time. Its boiling the frog tactic ffs.
3. The governments own the jab of which they are taking the tax dollar/pound and paying their companies for it. The whole idea is to collapse the worlds economy as well. Of which is well on the way, so if you ignore this bit you will have no money left in the bank when its done. Why do you think everyone is getting out of cash ? basics ffs.

I now understand you total naivety on these subjects and why you can't grasp any of it. You need the basics, whether you could ever get a hold of them is up to you, thats actually whether you even want too. On that point, there seems to be no point banging my head against the wall with you.
I'm still looking for an answer on the "credible sources" which none of you seem willing to provide. Its funny how you know all know which are not credible ? surely its an exercise in deduction, no ?
So if this is a false pandemic why did they start in 2019. What's so special about that year?
 
are you sure?

Bitchute hasnt been around that long a few years maybe.

there were places online calling out Jimmy before it was mainstream, probably not bitchute.
No not Bitchute, as you say, it wasn't around but those that now host on bitchute after being removed from other platforms were calling him out.
 
This is exactly my thinking Northwest I think the pandemic is real BUT the government have milked it for everything it's worth.
who are you asking and why are you so far behind ?

Can you give me your list of acceptable source ?? you seem to have missed my last 4 requests !
 
The myth about graphene oxide in vaccines seems to have originated with a Spanish study claiming that, using transmission electron microscopy (a microscopy technique which allows particularly fine details and structures to be seen), a solution created from a vial of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine takes a similar form to graphene oxide.
However there are many issues with this research, which has not been published in a scientific journal or peer reviewed.
Firstly, the provenance of the vial is unknown. We don’t know whether it was a vial of the vaccine, and fact checkers Health Feedback report that the person who sent the vial to the researcher is known to spread anti-vaccine content.
Secondly, the study says the findings are not “conclusive evidence” for the presence of graphene oxide in the vaccine.
While the researcher is a professor at the University of Almeria, the university has distanced itself from the work, saying it is “unofficial report by a university professor about an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with total lack of traceability”.

It would appear that that you are blinkered so much that you do not seem to be able to consider science, or simple maths and prefer to be only informed by amateur quacks and conspiracy theorists from the uneducated corners of the web. Your choice. Time will tell who is right.
But you can't deny simple science and maths, so there is no question to argue about the two points I am saying you are wrong on.

You'll note that I haven't participated in your Russiagate thread as I don't have the knowledge, experience or in fact interest to make any valid comment.

Also, a bit confused by the importance of the Tavistock Institute. They seem to be accepting Coronovirus as a fact of life to be dealt with - Nothing controversial to be seen unless you have got a specific item you wish us to refer to. Please enlighten us.
Possibly the best source to find out what is in our vaccines maybe the folks who actually developed it ?
 

Attachments

  • E693D275-7F90-4352-B803-C72BD5351ED4.jpeg
    E693D275-7F90-4352-B803-C72BD5351ED4.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 4
Have you got me a list of acceptable sources yet Daz, what's taking so long ?

You made 3 posts since l ask and not one mention of this crucial information I'd like that you obviously have at your finger tips !!
Have you got a answer to my mask question yet please.
 
I've just re-read a quickly some of this thread and to sum it up, its about the same as every other thread.

Its a load of dummies repeating "NO IT AIN'T" over and over..
Or just you reinventing the "truth" as per usual.
 
Or just you reinventing the "truth" as per usual.
really point out where ?

you are one of the silliest people ever to post on this board you know.

Was it Daz or you who ask "how can Oxygen get blocked by 20% and the virus get through". how stupid is that question eh !

oh ! just for you if it was you, the holes in a mask are 160 microns and the virus particles 1.3 microns. Does that help ? and the other clue is "restricts 20%). Theres my good deed for the day.
 
really point out where ?

you are one of the silliest people ever to post on this board you know.

Was it Daz or you who ask "how can Oxygen get blocked by 20% and the virus get through". how stupid is that question eh !

oh ! just for you if it was you, the holes in a mask are 160 microns and the virus particles 1.3 microns. Does that help ? and the other clue is "restricts 20%). Theres my good deed for the day.
Keep reinventing the truth...

Sad sad sad man.
 
Was it Daz or you who ask "how can Oxygen get blocked by 20% and the virus get through". how stupid is that question eh !

oh ! just for you if it was you, the holes in a mask are 160 microns and the virus particles 1.3 microns. Does that help ? and the other clue is "restricts 20%). Theres my good deed for the day.
And what size are oxygen molecules, Bnet?
 
really point out where ?

you are one of the silliest people ever to post on this board you know.

Was it Daz or you who ask "how can Oxygen get blocked by 20% and the virus get through". how stupid is that question eh !

oh ! just for you if it was you, the holes in a mask are 160 microns and the virus particles 1.3 microns. Does that help ? and the other clue is "restricts 20%). Theres my good deed for the day.
By the way it's There's . Oh and you're admitting there is a virus now then make up your mind sad man
 
And what size are oxygen molecules, Bnet?
Ill answer that for him Northwest as I don't think he knows.

Remember how the coronavirus is about 0.1 microns wide? A molecule of carbon dioxide is about 0.00033 microns wide, and oxygen is about the same—almost a thousand times smaller. so oxygen will be able to get in.
 
Ill answer that for him Northwest as I don't think he knows.

Remember how the coronavirus is about 0.1 microns wide? A molecule of carbon dioxide is about 0.00033 microns wide, and oxygen is about the same—almost a thousand times smaller. so oxygen will be able to get in.
If masks were/ are so effective against the spread of the virus can you explain how it spread through China so quick with folk dropping dead in the streets (remember the videos) when the Chinese have worn masks in their normal course of the day for years.
 
If masks were/ are so effective against the spread of the virus can you explain how it spread through China so quick with folk dropping dead in the streets (remember the videos) when the Chinese have worn masks in their normal course of the day for years.
Nothing is ever 100 percent effective. The masks help with not spreading it.
 
For someone who doesn't watch MSM, you seem to know a lot about what its been reporting. However, that's not the argument. Bnet has categorically stated that masks prevent 20% of oxygen getting to you, yet they are useless against stopping the virus. That just doesn't stack up.
That's the current argument.
 
And what size are oxygen molecules, Bnet?
without looking it up l don't know but you are ignoring the 20%.

Stop wriggling and lay down and die, l actually didn't think you was as dumb as Daz, Sardine,CCC etc but you seem to be, unless your ego is in overdrive ?

Can someone ask Daz what source of material is considered acceptable ? I've ask 5 times now, but he must not be seeing my messages, l know he is seeing part of them because he comments with silly reply to the ones he likes. Must only have half a screen or something !
 
For someone who doesn't watch MSM, you seem to know a lot about what its been reporting. However, that's not the argument. Bnet has categorically stated that masks prevent 20% of oxygen getting to you, yet they are useless against stopping the virus. That just doesn't stack up.
That's the current argument.
do the maths ffs.

what is wrong with you ?

l gave you all the clues,, Jesus wept...
 
Refer to posts 20, 23, 110 and 111 of this thread for oxygen and masks. It couldn't be clearer.

Similarly, posts 78 and 93 on this thread are just two that debunk the graphene oxide claims.

Most of all just use some common sense!

 
Back
Top