Tell me with a straight face...

All looks very dodgy...
Just as a matter of debate...do people have a view on anything(s) that shouldn't be permitted on the web?
 
sixthswan said:
Hey jackiegoogleads
Do you have any boundaries for what can be on the 'net - besides women's football?
Click to expand...
Also, stop with the unoriginal nickname, try and find a bit of humour in yourself, don't just blindly copy someone else's funny. Ok Google?

You could try chat ai, that might give you some funny nicknames, it'll definitely be better than your rubbish attempt.
 
jackiegoogleads...I'm asking if you have an opinion about freedom on the web...if there should be limitations?
Because you created a thread about internet censorship.
 
If you really want to know, here's what I think about censorship on the internet. The question of whether there should be censorship on the internet is a complex and debated issue that involves considerations of free speech, ethics, cultural values, and legal frameworks. Different countries and regions approach internet censorship differently, and opinions on the matter vary.

Here are some arguments for and against internet censorship:
Arguments in favor of internet censorship:
  1. Protection of public interest: Censorship is sometimes justified as a means to protect the public from harmful content, such as hate speech, incitement to violence, or illegal activities.
  2. National security: Governments may argue that certain information poses a threat to national security and that censorship is necessary to safeguard the country.
  3. Prevention of misinformation: Censorship can be seen as a way to prevent the spread of false information, particularly during times of crisis or in contexts where misinformation can have serious consequences.
  4. Cultural and moral values: Some argue that censorship is necessary to uphold cultural or moral values, preventing the dissemination of content that is considered offensive or inappropriate within a particular cultural or religious context.
Arguments against internet censorship:
  1. Freedom of speech: One of the fundamental arguments against censorship is the principle of freedom of speech. Many argue that individuals have the right to express their thoughts and opinions, even if those ideas are controversial or unpopular.
  2. Inhibition of creativity and innovation: Censorship may stifle creativity and hinder the free exchange of ideas, potentially limiting the growth and innovation that can arise from open dialogue and diverse perspectives.
  3. Potential for abuse: Censorship powers could be abused by governments or authorities to suppress dissent, control information, or limit political opposition.
  4. Global nature of the internet: The internet transcends national borders, and what may be considered acceptable in one country may not be in another. Implementing effective and ethical censorship across diverse cultural contexts is challenging.
The debate around internet censorship is ongoing, and different countries have adopted various approaches based on their legal, cultural, and political considerations. Striking a balance between protecting individuals and societies and respecting fundamental rights and freedoms remains a complex challenge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top