Political, main stream media and Judicial Corruption

Dear oh dear.

Does he really call himself a journalist? That's the biggest lie.

He's a nasty piece of shit pretending to be serious to promote his poisonous racist agenda.

Of course there are ignorant, racist and scumbag Muslims. Just like there are ignorant racist scumbags in every culture. Like Tommy Robinson.

The BBC, ITV and Channel 4 'mainstream media' work under clear regulations that Robinson totally ignores. Those regulations are vital in these days of social media half truths and we should be very grateful for them.

Robinson could just as easily make a 'documentary' showing how misunderstood Hitler was, using actual video and transcripts. It could present a very compelling case. If you're thick as pigshit.

Robinson isn't showing the other side of issues. He's using a format to peddle a personal mission that only wants to divide us. That's the entire point of him.

There are plenty of them out there nowadays. Of the left and right. Pro this or anti that. Biased ignorant bollocks.
 
NeuroFox said:
Dear oh dear.

Does he really call himself a journalist? That's the biggest lie.

He's a nasty piece of shit pretending to be serious to promote his poisonous racist agenda.

Of course there are ignorant, racist and scumbag Muslims. Just like there are ignorant racist scumbags in every culture. Like Tommy Robinson.

The BBC, ITV and Channel 4 'mainstream media' work under clear regulations that Robinson totally ignores. Those regulations are vital in these days of social media half truths and we should be very grateful for them.

Robinson could just as easily make a 'documentary' showing how misunderstood Hitler was, using actual video and transcripts. It could present a very compelling case. If you're thick as pigshit.

Robinson isn't showing the other side of issues. He's using a format to peddle a personal mission that only wants to divide us. That's the entire point of him.

There are plenty of them out there nowadays. Of the left and right. Pro this or anti that. Biased ignorant bollocks.
Click to expand...
Did you even watch the documentary? Your foolish rant suggests not. What a completely embarrassing reply. You are an idiot. You are so pathetic.
 
FoxInEssex said:
Did you even watch the documentary? Your foolish rant suggests not. What a completely embarrassing reply. You are an idiot. You are so pathetic.
Click to expand...
of cause he didn't, he as an agenda that is full of lies.

Hes a horrible person, l bet that there's not a person on here who can say they know this person Neurofox, thats because hes hiding his true identity.

Why would you do that ?

is it because you are not man enough to back up your bull shit ?

Anyone care to vouch for Neurofox ?

You bet your life there isn't.
 
FoxInEssex said:
Did you even watch the documentary? Your foolish rant suggests not. What a completely embarrassing reply. You are an idiot. You are so pathetic.
Click to expand...

I watched the first 20 minutes, a bit in the middle and the last 10 minutes. I deserve a medal for managing that much to be honest.

He doesn't even attempt to do basic journalistic practices. There is undercover recording of people who didn't give their permission. There is diabolical editing of comments to ensure that his agenda is supported. There is also downright misrepresentation.

There are good reasons why it was banned.
 
bnet said:
of cause he didn't, he as an agenda that is full of lies.

Hes a horrible person, l bet that there's not a person on here who can say they know this person Neurofox, thats because hes hiding his true identity.

Why would you do that ?

is it because you are not man enough to back up your bull shit ?

Anyone care to vouch for Neurofox ?

You bet your life there isn't.
Click to expand...

Haha.

You spent ages on here telling me that you did know who I was. Now you've given that up and decided I'm some sort of mysterious liar!

This is an internet forum. It's not the fucking Freemasonry.

Daft twat.
 
NeuroFox said:
Haha.

You spent ages on here telling me that you did know who I was. Now you've given that up and decided I'm some sort of mysterious liar!

This is an internet forum. It's not the fucking Freemasonry.

Daft twat.
Click to expand...
l think that was one of your other fake log ins.

Anyone vouch for you ?

Why not eh ?

What are you afraid of ?

50 people on here know who l am and l don't care who else does, as l don't lie.

See l have nothing to hide, what you see is what you get.

You, well your posts have no value because you have to pretend that you are someone else. Don't you get this !
 
Neurofoxes first post under this fake log in.

Hes only here to insult, but hasn't the guts to do it under his own name.


Search results

www.bentleysroof.co.uk www.bentleysroof.co.uk
 
bnet said:
l think that was one of your other fake log ins.

Anyone vouch for you ?

Why not eh ?

What are you afraid of ?

50 people on here know who l am and l don't care who else does, as l don't lie.

See l have nothing to hide, what you see is what you get.

You, well your posts have no value because you have to pretend that you are someone else. Don't you get this !
Click to expand...

My Dad's bigger than your Dad.

Grow up for goodness sake. What do you want to do? Meet me and show me some more of your favourite videos?
 
NeuroFox said:
I watched the first 20 minutes, a bit in the middle and the last 10 minutes. I deserve a medal for managing that much to be honest.

He doesn't even attempt to do basic journalistic practices. There is undercover recording of people who didn't give their permission. There is diabolical editing of comments to ensure that his agenda is supported. There is also downright misrepresentation.

There are good reasons why it was banned.
Click to expand...
So no then. Is it good journalism to hide/not investigate the truth before vilifying a 15 year old boy?

Was Piers Morgan a great journalist for calling the lad a bully etc?

Was it ok for the supposed victim to verbally and physically attack whatever girls? Was it ok for him to say he was going to rape the poor lads 9 year old sisters before?

What about all of the missing evidence from the law firm that was involved in suing Tommy Robinson? Was that ethical?

What about the ANTIFA freak who has not been charged by the police from saying on video he was going to mince his children. The same nutter who has lets have a a white genocide on his fucking profile? Is that ethical?

You probably won't be able to answer any of the questions above as you would have to watch the documentary first. Whether you like Tommy Robinson or not is a mute point. It is without doubt one of the best, most comprehensive pieces of journalism I have seen in a long time.

Too many white apologists so happy to turn on a child to show how multi-cultural they are, afraid of what they may be labelled
 
FoxInEssex said:
So no then. Is it good journalism to hide/not investigate the truth before vilifying a 15 year old boy?

Was Piers Morgan a great journalist for calling the lad a bully etc?

Was it ok for the supposed victim to verbally and physically attack whatever girls? Was it ok for him to say he was going to rape the poor lads 9 year old sisters before?

What about all of the missing evidence from the law firm that was involved in suing Tommy Robinson? Was that ethical?

What about the ANTIFA freak who has not been charged by the police from saying on video he was going to mince his children. The same nutter who has lets have a a white genocide on his fucking profile? Is that ethical?

You probably won't be able to answer any of the questions above as you would have to watch the documentary first. Whether you like Tommy Robinson or not is a mute point. It is without doubt one of the best, most comprehensive pieces of journalism I have seen in a long time.

Too many white apologists so happy to turn on a child to show how multi-cultural they are, afraid of what they may be labelled
Click to expand...

You don't have the first clue what you're talking about.
 
NeuroFox said:
My Dad's bigger than your Dad.

Grow up for goodness sake. What do you want to do? Meet me and show me some more of your favourite videos?
Click to expand...
"my dads bigger than your dad"

what the fuck does that mean you fucking idiot, you can have my name anytime you want, but you'll just hide behind your alias you fucking turd.
PM me eh !
 
FoxInEssex said:
You have no answer do you? You are so blinded by your dislike for Tommy Robinson that you refuse to acknowledge FACT!

You really are quite thick.
Click to expand...

Okay genius.

If I can be bothered to give your dopey hero's video half and hour of my time, maybe you can do the same and actually read the judicial judgment on the case he focuses on. Here it is because I'm sure you're not capable of locating it unless some nutter talks about it on one of your YouTube subscriptions: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hijazi-v-Yaxley-Lennon-judgment-220721.pdf

The court were actually incredibly patient with your hero. They tried to give him every chance to make his case because they knew neanderthals like you and bnet would be spitting venom if they didn't. His attempt to prove his case was pathetic. Piss poor.

That's why his 'documentary' is banned. That's why he's been arrested for sharing it. And that's why it's obvious that he's a grifter.

Where is the 'documentary' does Robinson admit that he is friends with Bailey? Bailey's brother is close to Robinson and a former EDL member. His brother is also in prison at the moment for smuggling cocaine. He doesn't mention that at all does he?

Does he mention that Bailey's mother has previous also? For racist abuse. No?

It's all a game to Robinson. One where he is always the victim. Always the one trying to do the right thing and the system is against him. He always ends up in court or prison and pleading for thicko neanderthals to send him money. And they do. You probably do too. Thicko.
 
NeuroFox said:
Okay genius.

If I can be bothered to give your dopey hero's video half and hour of my time, maybe you can do the same and actually read the judicial judgment on the case he focuses on. Here it is because I'm sure you're not capable of locating it unless some nutter talks about it on one of your YouTube subscriptions: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hijazi-v-Yaxley-Lennon-judgment-220721.pdf

The court were actually incredibly patient with your hero. They tried to give him every chance to make his case because they knew neanderthals like you and bnet would be spitting venom if they didn't. His attempt to prove his case was pathetic. Piss poor.

That's why his 'documentary' is banned. That's why he's been arrested for sharing it. And that's why it's obvious that he's a grifter.

Where is the 'documentary' does Robinson admit that he is friends with Bailey? Bailey's brother is close to Robinson and a former EDL member. His brother is also in prison at the moment for smuggling cocaine. He doesn't mention that at all does he?

Does he mention that Bailey's mother has previous also? For racist abuse. No?

It's all a game to Robinson. One where he is always the victim. Always the one trying to do the right thing and the system is against him. He always ends up in court or prison and pleading for thicko neanderthals to send him money. And they do. You probably do too. Thicko.
Click to expand...
that is basically the biggest load of bollocks anyone as ever written on here.

Well done you horrible piece of shite.,

You haven't watched it, you don't know the background you are just pure dirt.

Hes in prison now on trumped up terrorist charges.

This is so stupid from a seriously stupid man, he thinks that what your mother or brother do (which l doubt is true anyway) gos against you in court.
How fucking stupid are you, are you in the Olympics this week representing Britain in the stupidest cunt in the world event ?

You want a family to have to go in to hiding for fear of being murdered because there was a school yard fight ? You wanker.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why was the documentary banned, who as the right to ban a documentary , cunts who suppress free speech you fucking moron. That'll be the fake government and tossers like you who do not understand the right to free speech and what happens when it is taken away.
 
bnet said:
Why was the documentary banned, who as the right to ban a documentary , cunts who suppress free speech you fucking moron. That'll be the fake government and tossers like you who do not understand the right to free speech and what happens when it is taken away.
Click to expand...

Have you heard of the law? It is quite fundamental to a functioning democracy.

Anyway, the law is a set of rules which are designed to ensure that everybody is treated equally and afforded the same rights and protections.

You rely on it. I rely on it. We all do.

Your hero's 'documentary' is full of proven lies. It is defamatory. It is not a truthful account. The court went through everything Robinson had as evidence and it was a load of old shite. That's why the law got involved to protect the people involved.

What do you think free speech means? Do you have the right to make any old shit up and get away with it? Oh shit. You do. That's your whole thing. No wonder you're a fan of Robinson.

You want to live in a world where you can invent any old nonsense and peddle it as fact don't you?
 
NeuroFox said:
Have you heard of the law? It is quite fundamental to a functioning democracy.

Anyway, the law is a set of rules which are designed to ensure that everybody is treated equally and afforded the same rights and protections.

You rely on it. I rely on it. We all do.

Your hero's 'documentary' is full of proven lies. It is defamatory. It is not a truthful account. The court went through everything Robinson had as evidence and it was a load of old shite. That's why the law got involved to protect the people involved.

What do you think free speech means? Do you have the right to make any old shit up and get away with it? Oh shit. You do. That's your whole thing. No wonder you're a fan of Robinson.

You want to live in a world where you can invent any old nonsense and peddle it as fact don't you?
Click to expand...
If it was full of lies why wasn't he sued then you fucking idiot.
 
NeuroFox said:
Have you heard of the law? It is quite fundamental to a functioning democracy.

Anyway, the law is a set of rules which are designed to ensure that everybody is treated equally and afforded the same rights and protections.

You rely on it. I rely on it. We all do.

Your hero's 'documentary' is full of proven lies. It is defamatory. It is not a truthful account. The court went through everything Robinson had as evidence and it was a load of old shite. That's why the law got involved to protect the people involved.

What do you think free speech means? Do you have the right to make any old shit up and get away with it? Oh shit. You do. That's your whole thing. No wonder you're a fan of Robinson.

You want to live in a world where you can invent any old nonsense and peddle it as fact don't you?
Click to expand...
Here you go twat -

The only law that has to be adhered too is -

COMMIT NO HARM LOSS OR INJURY !

There also as to be a victim, silly bollocks .

There are NO other laws.

I could go into this but you are a fucking idiot and a fucking liar so get fucked.
 
bnet said:
Here you go twat -

The only law that has to be adhered too is -

COMMIT NO HARM LOSS OR INJURY !

There also as to be a victim, silly bollocks .

There are NO other laws.

I could go into this but you are a fucking idiot and a fucking liar so get fucked.
Click to expand...

Is that really the best that you can do?
 
bnet said:
Here you go twat -

The only law that has to be adhered too is -

COMMIT NO HARM LOSS OR INJURY !

There also as to be a victim, silly bollocks .

There are NO other laws.

I could go into this but you are a fucking idiot and a fucking liar so get fucked.
Click to expand...
Is this that Freemen of the land Maritime Law BS? Good luck trying that stuff in court.
 
bnet said:
The only law that has to be adhered too is -

COMMIT NO HARM LOSS OR INJURY !

There also as to be a victim
Click to expand...

Okay. So how about the fact that his harrassment of the family meant that they received loads of death threats from his supporters, they have had to move address multiple times and the daughter attempted suicide?

Isn't that HARM LOSS OR INJURY? Isn't there a victim in that? Or don't they count because they're not British enough for you?
 
NeuroFox said:
Okay. So how about the fact that his harrassment of the family meant that they received loads of death threats from his supporters, they have had to move address multiple times and the daughter attempted suicide?

Isn't that HARM LOSS OR INJURY? Isn't there a victim in that? Or don't they count because they're not British enough for you?
Click to expand...
yes but thats lies again you silly cunt.

You really really are a full on twat.
 
Club_B00k_Crutchless said:
Is this that Freemen of the land Maritime Law BS? Good luck trying that stuff in court.
Click to expand...
no its the law, the only law.

Don't try and blag that you have any idea of it because you obviously don't you half whit cunt.

No go away and leave the adults too this.
 
bnet said:
Here you go twat -

The only law that has to be adhered too is -

COMMIT NO HARM LOSS OR INJURY !

There also as to be a victim, silly bollocks .

There are NO other laws.

I could go into this but you are a fucking idiot and a fucking liar so get fucked.
Click to expand...
challenge this you prick, try and keep up you shit cunt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top