what ?Just check the first patent and what it actually was for.
The rest follow suit.
Perhaps someone needs to "do their research"As a two second Google search proves.
did you look at the actual patent or a report on the patent ?The first patent isn't a patent for AIDS. It was a patent for a treatment for AIDS.
The rest are all misrepresented in the graphic too.
Another example of a misrepresentation of the truth.
"Fact Check". if you believe that these are independent you needs your bumps feelingFact check: List of US patents is not evidence that viruses are manmade
A list of patents linked to specific diseases and viruses is being shared with the suggestion that it is proof that viruses are manmade. This is false, and a misinterpretation of the types of patent listed.www.reuters.com
why ? if you can understand what l wrote and you read, you'd be ready for junior school.Perhaps someone needs to "do their research"
you really really are past helping !As a two second Google search proves.
You said please explain this and we did.you really really are past helping !
You said please explain this and we did.
Almost immediately.
You are the one beyond both hope and parody twat!
you've got to snap out of this 12 year old girl attitude girlfriend ..You can't even quote correctly.
And you need to learn how to use the internet, troll.you've got to snap out of this 12 year old girl attitude girlfriend ..
"troll" you're so silly, and bitter.And you need to learn how to use the internet, troll.
Keep on trolling."troll" you're so silly, and bitter.
Was it a full swap ? you know, the "op" ?
As you appear to be the board expert on this, do you have a dark secret you need to share?"troll" you're so silly, and bitter.
Was it a full swap ? you know, the "op" ?