Matías Soulé

I can't remember when the club tried so hard to get a particular player in.
Perhaps our dllly dallying over the price let the others in but seeing their over
generous deals lately it's difficult to be critical.
 
I can't remember when the club tried so hard to get a particular player in.
Perhaps our dllly dallying over the price let the others in but seeing their over
generous deals lately it's difficult to be critical.
Where's the evidence that this whole story is anything but journo bollocks?
Has Glover been quoted somewhere saying that he's our No.1 target?
 
Where's the evidence that this whole story is anything but journo bollocks?
Has Glover been quoted somewhere saying that he's our No.1 target?
No, because that never happens. But if many different sources are all reporting that we've made repeated bids for a player, that probably indicates that we're interested in that player.

However, I don't think we'll get this particular player...
 
Turning into another Nicky Maynard situation
The bloke don’t want to be here , we shouldn’t go for him
Rudkin never learns 😀
 
No, because that never happens. But if many different sources are all reporting that we've made repeated bids for a player, that probably indicates that we're interested in that player.

However, I don't think we'll get this particular player...
I must admit that I was being a touch sarcastic in reply to such unfounded conviction that we were so determined to sign him.
The problem with your 'multiple sources' rationale is just how easy it is for internet idiots to simply copy whatever bollocks each other have dreamt up. I accept that John Percy's number seems to be on Danny Ward's SIM card, but the rest of the cunts are just Bert in disguise IMHO.
 
'Journo bollocks' ' cunts'.
Another vacuous and foul mouthed contribution from a poster with the nerve to call himself Top'.
Evidence? Really?
 
'Journo bollocks' ' cunts'.
Another vacuous and foul mouthed contribution from a poster with the nerve to call himself Top'.
Evidence? Really?
OK Mr "holier then thou I never swear".
What is vacuous about my post?
You pretend to know what's going on in your nicey-nicey swearing-free post, but get all offended when asked to prove what you claim to know has ben going on.

As What? suggests, don't read my fucking posts if you're going to piss the bed every time you do.
 
The experts further up announced the first rejected offer was £21m, no?
Making two offers for a player is almost unprecedented in our club's history, according to another expert on here :ROFLMAO:
 
'Top'fox - It's not about being 'holier than thou' which is hilarious to a lifelong antitheist or the langauge used.
It's about having some respect for fellow posters. Which is in the rules you sign up to follow.
As some have suggested I could 'ignore'your posts but your attitude will not go away and all the evidence
about unacceptable behaviour is that it is encouraged as 'normal' if not contested, and having some standards.
Trust your fellow roofers to know that reading/assessing the media is part of football as in real life and they
are good at it..
Playground language does not aid your views, just the opposite as it suggests you are an uneducated oaf
which is probably untrue.
On the subject in question, if you know the game you will know that (a) LC does not comment on transfer
dealings and (b) the Italian football press is far more concentrated and open than what we are used to thus
supplying an endless stream of' inside' info in any given aspect of the game.
This is the evidence, the sheer weight of comment.
 
'Top'fox - It's not about being 'holier than thou' which is hilarious to a lifelong antitheist or the langauge used.
It's about having some respect for fellow posters. Which is in the rules you sign up to follow.
As some have suggested I could 'ignore'your posts but your attitude will not go away and all the evidence
about unacceptable behaviour is that it is encouraged as 'normal' if not contested, and having some standards.
Trust your fellow roofers to know that reading/assessing the media is part of football as in real life and they
are good at it..
Playground language does not aid your views, just the opposite as it suggests you are an uneducated oaf
which is probably untrue.
On the subject in question, if you know the game you will know that (a) LC does not comment on transfer
dealings and (b) the Italian football press is far more concentrated and open than what we are used to thus
supplying an endless stream of' inside' info in any given aspect of the game.
This is the evidence, the sheer weight of comment.
So you say it's not about the language I use. Good. As to respect to fellow posters, I very rarely use any such language towards other people on here. I have no problem calling out the dubious writings of many tabloid journos to be bollocks, and have no problem calling out pedlars of idle speculation under the guise of inside knowledge as cunts.
I'm 99% sure that I AM an uneducated oaf in your book. How I express myself in quick disposable rubbish on places like this is a direct product of what I heard and said when being brought up, how me and my mates spoke at school, at work, in the pub, in the hours spent laughing at derek and clive and chubby brown, and at home, My missus is probably even worse for calling a 'c' a 'c'! Just because you'd never have mixed with people like me in those environments doesn't mean that me and "my attitude" should go away from here, just because it differs from what you like. Sounds like you're one of those lefties who love to get offended on behalf of others. 'Playground language' - ooh, you're obviously a much better person and cleverer than me. Do I give a shit?

You obviously missed my post admitting to sarcasm re a public announcement from the club – good job, you probably frown upon fucking sarcasm too – so I needn't bother replying as to whether I know football as you condescendingly put it, but your other protestations fail to hide the fact that you come across as one of several on here who like to kid themselves and others that you're somehow more in the know just because you spend lots more time reading wanky internet rumours than the rest of us with better stuff to do. Sheer weight of probably-copied comment? Fine to say you can't remember so many rumours about us trying to sign a player, but that's a long way from what you were claiming. Although clearly I wasn't aware that you are an expert in assessing the media. whatever that's meant to mean.
 
Dear oh dear, touched a few nerves there. :)
Not as many nerves as the odd bit of 'playground language' from me appears to touch in you.
You feel entitled to call other people's posts vacuous, but can only claim to 'know football' and to be an expert at 'assessing the media' when trying to justify your latest know-all comment.
Enough said, you supercilious old fart.
 
Socialists are taught not regard themselves as superior to anyone. Your cheap abuse mkes that
very difficult.
 
Back
Top