London has Fallen

Everton Carr

Registered
Around 100 men from the religion of peace break into a Sikh restaurant Rangrez Resturant and threaten the owner Harman Singh Kapoor with death and rape of his children because he don't use Halal meat.None of them arrested just the owner for carrying a Kirpan a permitted Sikh dagger.
 
Yet again, you begin a thread with a small piece of a story that is bastardised purely for the purpose to create division.

You may be a deeply lost soul without the intellect to understand the world you're in, but why do you insist on puking it all over everyone else?
 
Yet again, you begin a thread with a small piece of a story that is bastardised purely for the purpose to create division.

You may be a deeply lost soul without the intellect to understand the world you're in, but why do you insist on puking it all over everyone else
Small piece of a story.What have I said that's incorrect.You may be happy with what's happening in the UK the majority of us are terrified. The day Lee Rigby was murdered was the day the UK was lost.
 
Small piece of a story.What have I said that's incorrect.You may be happy with what's happening in the UK the majority of us are terrified. The day Lee Rigby was murdered was the day the UK was lost.

You have no concept of the truth.

Thank you for admitting that you live life as a terrified man. It is a sad thing to be you.

Every generation contains people like you that detach from the times and hide away in terror creating ever greater reasons to pretend the world is too dangerous. Now they get to use social media from their bunkers.
 
So, Neuro Fox come on then, what's your take on the incident? Do you have one?

Not really. It isn't the sort of story that is worth getting your knickers in a twist about.

The owner of the restaurant had been engaged in multiple examples of religious provocation, mostly towards Sikhs with slightly different views to his. He is perfectly entitled to opt not to serve halal meat, and do many thousands of restaurants, the problem here was that he escalated the issue deliberately to court controversy and encite a response.

He got a response and then cried about it. Both parties involved were idiotic, it was just twats being twats.

Absolutely nothing about the story merits getting all worked up about racial tension and 'London has fallen' bullshit.
 
Not really. It isn't the sort of story that is worth getting your knickers in a twist about.

The owner of the restaurant had been engaged in multiple examples of religious provocation, mostly towards Sikhs with slightly different views to his. He is perfectly entitled to opt not to serve halal meat, and do many thousands of restaurants, the problem here was that he escalated the issue deliberately to court controversy and encite a response.

He got a response and then cried about it. Both parties involved were idiotic, it was just twats being twats.

Absolutely nothing about the story merits getting all worked up about racial tension and 'London has fallen' bullshit.
OK then.
 
Not my words but written about London by someone who actually lives and works here:
London has long been the mirror through which Britain sees itself. Today that reflection is being deliberately distorted. No city in modern Britain has been more misrepresented, more cynically weaponised, or more dishonestly described than London has been by the far right.

They call it unsafe and chaotic, overrun by crime and migration. They claim whole districts have been lost to “no-go zones,” that the capital has fallen to disorder, that its diversity has weakened it. These are lies created to serve a purpose. When facts cannot sustain an ideology, fear becomes their substitute.

For those of us who live here, we know the truth is the opposite. London’s homicide rate is at its lowest since records began. Violent crime has fallen across every borough. The city is safer than Paris, Brussels, Berlin or Madrid. Walk through Tower Hamlets, Brixton or Tottenham and you find no Sharia patrols or forbidden quarters, only people living their lives in one of the most vibrant and creative cities on earth. The far right depends on myth because reality refutes them.

London’s diversity is not a weakness to be managed, it is a strength that sustains it. Its global culture, its languages, its food, its art and its tolerance are what make it a world city while others decline. That strength unsettles those who need division to thrive. They cannot build a movement on hope, so they turn to resentment. They take familiar symbols of Britain and twist them into warnings against difference.

What they call concern about crime is really an effort to control how people live and who belongs. Every fabricated “no-go zone” or exaggerated statistic is a political tool, designed to pit neighbour against neighbour and present diversity as decay. The goal is to make fear feel patriotic and whilst this is happening across the country, it’s particularly prevelant in London.

Sadiq Khan sits at the centre of that campaign. The far right and much of the Conservative press use him as a vessel for their anger towards London itself. They accuse him of destroying the city, of siding with extremists, of caring more for Muslims than for the rest of its residents. They circulate fantasies of “Londonistan” and “third-world chaos” to turn his faith into a political weapon. Yet the voters who know this city best have rejected that story again and again. Khan has been elected three times, in 2016, 2021 and 2024, each time by clear margins.

He remains the first and only mayor to win three terms, supported by more than a million Londoners in every election. His victories have come despite the noise, despite the smears, and despite relentless attempts to make him a symbol of decline. Londoners know what they see each day. The city is working, and Khan remains part of that success, not the cause of its problems.

Now, Reform and others are building their message on a lie. They want to turn London into a symbol of everything they claim has gone wrong with Britain. They call it a hell hole to make diversity look like decay, to convince people that a city full of difference cannot work. None of it is true. Their story is not about London at all but about how to divide the rest of the country from it. They need resentment more than they need answers, and they have built their politics around that need.

I have lived in London for years and I know their story is false. I have lived in Woolwich, the Isle of Dogs and Uxbridge, in neighbourhoods that show the city’s scale and variety. I see London each day in the early rush of commuters, in the shopkeepers opening shutters, in the conversations between strangers who will never meet again. It is a city held together by shared purpose, not fear. That is what the far right cannot bear. London’s resilience cuts through everything they claim to stand for. It proves that people from different backgrounds can live and build together, and that cooperation always wins over fear. The far right cannot accept that truth because it ends their story. They rely on division to survive, and they will go on spreading resentment until they are stopped.
 
Not my words but written about London by someone who actually lives and works here:
London has long been the mirror through which Britain sees itself. Today that reflection is being deliberately distorted. No city in modern Britain has been more misrepresented, more cynically weaponised, or more dishonestly described than London has been by the far right.

They call it unsafe and chaotic, overrun by crime and migration. They claim whole districts have been lost to “no-go zones,” that the capital has fallen to disorder, that its diversity has weakened it. These are lies created to serve a purpose. When facts cannot sustain an ideology, fear becomes their substitute.

For those of us who live here, we know the truth is the opposite. London’s homicide rate is at its lowest since records began. Violent crime has fallen across every borough. The city is safer than Paris, Brussels, Berlin or Madrid. Walk through Tower Hamlets, Brixton or Tottenham and you find no Sharia patrols or forbidden quarters, only people living their lives in one of the most vibrant and creative cities on earth. The far right depends on myth because reality refutes them.

London’s diversity is not a weakness to be managed, it is a strength that sustains it. Its global culture, its languages, its food, its art and its tolerance are what make it a world city while others decline. That strength unsettles those who need division to thrive. They cannot build a movement on hope, so they turn to resentment. They take familiar symbols of Britain and twist them into warnings against difference.

What they call concern about crime is really an effort to control how people live and who belongs. Every fabricated “no-go zone” or exaggerated statistic is a political tool, designed to pit neighbour against neighbour and present diversity as decay. The goal is to make fear feel patriotic and whilst this is happening across the country, it’s particularly prevelant in London.

Sadiq Khan sits at the centre of that campaign. The far right and much of the Conservative press use him as a vessel for their anger towards London itself. They accuse him of destroying the city, of siding with extremists, of caring more for Muslims than for the rest of its residents. They circulate fantasies of “Londonistan” and “third-world chaos” to turn his faith into a political weapon. Yet the voters who know this city best have rejected that story again and again. Khan has been elected three times, in 2016, 2021 and 2024, each time by clear margins.

He remains the first and only mayor to win three terms, supported by more than a million Londoners in every election. His victories have come despite the noise, despite the smears, and despite relentless attempts to make him a symbol of decline. Londoners know what they see each day. The city is working, and Khan remains part of that success, not the cause of its problems.

Now, Reform and others are building their message on a lie. They want to turn London into a symbol of everything they claim has gone wrong with Britain. They call it a hell hole to make diversity look like decay, to convince people that a city full of difference cannot work. None of it is true. Their story is not about London at all but about how to divide the rest of the country from it. They need resentment more than they need answers, and they have built their politics around that need.

I have lived in London for years and I know their story is false. I have lived in Woolwich, the Isle of Dogs and Uxbridge, in neighbourhoods that show the city’s scale and variety. I see London each day in the early rush of commuters, in the shopkeepers opening shutters, in the conversations between strangers who will never meet again. It is a city held together by shared purpose, not fear. That is what the far right cannot bear. London’s resilience cuts through everything they claim to stand for. It proves that people from different backgrounds can live and build together, and that cooperation always wins over fear. The far right cannot accept that truth because it ends their story. They rely on division to survive, and they will go on spreading resentment until they are stopped.
All absolute bollocks mate. You could write that about Birmingham, Manchester etc. Go to Tower Hamlets, Ilford, Barking amongst others and you can see first hand, the division in those places. The number of people not capable of having a conversation in English. No English shops. Attacks on Christian preachers. Attacks on women wearing short dresses. I could go on but you get the point.

London is a caliphate shithole in a lot of places that the tourists don't see. Pretending otherwise is just downright silly. It is a shadow of its former glory which was once one of the great cities in the world.

Lots of people I know who have lived in London all their lives are looking to move out. I work in North Acton and there is rubbish everywhere as soon as you step off the train.

As for Khan, we all know why he keeps winning. Let's again not pretend otherwise. I think you and I both know he gets in because of the Champagne Socialists and a vast number of non native people who have the right to vote given to them by a country that has given them so much for nothing back. He is also the only politician in London who refuses to acknowledge the scale of rape gangs in London. Why is that?
 
Last edited:
All absolute bollocks mate. You could write that about Birmingham, Manchester etc. Go to Tower Hamlets, Ilford, Barking amongst others and you can see first hand, the division in those places. The number of people not capable of having a conversation in English. No English shops. Attacks on Christian preachers. Attacks on women wearing short dresses. I could go on but you get the point.

London is a caliphate shithole in a lot of places that the tourists don't see. Pretending otherwise is just downright silly. It is a shadow of its former glory which was once one of the great cities in the world.

Lots of people I know who have lived in London all their lives are looking to move out. I work in North Acton and there is rubbish everywhere as soon as you step off the train.

As for Khan, we all know why he keeps winning. Let's again not pretend otherwise. I think you and I both know he gets in because of the Champagne Socialists and a vast number of non native people who have the right to vote given to them by a country that has given them so much for nothing back. He is also the only politician in London who refuses to acknowledge the scale of rape gangs in London. Why is that?
Confirmation bias 👍🏼
 
the right to vote given to them by a country that has given them so much for nothing back.
It’s this kind of sweeping, dismissive bollocks that undermines everything you have mentioned.

Just backs up everything I’ve said before that matter how much anyone non-white assimilates, respects the laws, contributes to society with hard work etc etc, in the eyes of some they will never, ever be an equal.
 
All absolute bollocks mate. You could write that about Birmingham, Manchester etc. Go to Tower Hamlets, Ilford, Barking amongst others and you can see first hand, the division in those places. The number of people not capable of having a conversation in English. No English shops. Attacks on Christian preachers. Attacks on women wearing short dresses. I could go on but you get the point.

London is a caliphate shithole in a lot of places that the tourists don't see. Pretending otherwise is just downright silly. It is a shadow of its former glory which was once one of the great cities in the world.

Lots of people I know who have lived in London all their lives are looking to move out. I work in North Acton and there is rubbish everywhere as soon as you step off the train.

As for Khan, we all know why he keeps winning. Let's again not pretend otherwise. I think you and I both know he gets in because of the Champagne Socialists and a vast number of non native people who have the right to vote given to them by a country that has given them so much for nothing back. He is also the only politician in London who refuses to acknowledge the scale of rape gangs in London. Why is that?
What kind of shop sells English?
You do go on and I don't get the point because you're rattling shite.
It is still the greatest city in the world, it's regularly recognised as such.
People move out of London and always have, if they didn't how would people from outside of London manage to move here.
I live in Hackney and it's cleaned regularly.
Champagne Socialists? I'm certainly happier having Khan voters as neighbours than I would be having the likes of you, Pen 4 and Everton.
It's like playing right wing bingo when you post.

Thanks for your post, just proves that you're no different to Pen 4, you're a racist who is scared off anything that differs to your safe little 1950s suburbia dream.

I'll go back to just reading and shaking at my head in horror at the bile you post.
 
What kind of shop sells English?
You do go on and I don't get the point because you're rattling shite.
It is still the greatest city in the world, it's regularly recognised as such.
People move out of London and always have, if they didn't how would people from outside of London manage to move here.
I live in Hackney and it's cleaned regularly.
Champagne Socialists? I'm certainly happier having Khan voters as neighbours than I would be having the likes of you, Pen 4 and Everton.
It's like playing right wing bingo when you post.

Thanks for your post, just proves that you're no different to Pen 4, you're a racist who is scared off anything that differs to your safe little 1950s suburbia dream.

I'll go back to just reading and shaking at my head in horror at the bile you post.
Again. Sometimes the truth hurts. You can call me whatever name you want. I couldn't care less.

Words are meaningless when people can use their eyes. London is a shithole. You have your head in the sand.

You throw names like racist etc. around shows exactly who you really are.

I am not scared of anything. I just don't want to live amongst shite that you seem happy to, whilst pretending that everything is alright.

I will continue to read your posts and imagine you are 'that guy' at parties.

Oh and Khan refuses to discuss rape gangs. Why would he do that? Who is the real racist?
 
All absolute bollocks mate. You could write that about Birmingham, Manchester etc. Go to Tower Hamlets, Ilford, Barking amongst others and you can see first hand, the division in those places. The number of people not capable of having a conversation in English. No English shops. Attacks on Christian preachers. Attacks on women wearing short dresses. I could go on but you get the point.

London is a caliphate shithole in a lot of places that the tourists don't see. Pretending otherwise is just downright silly. It is a shadow of its former glory which was once one of the great cities in the world.

Lots of people I know who have lived in London all their lives are looking to move out. I work in North Acton and there is rubbish everywhere as soon as you step off the train.

As for Khan, we all know why he keeps winning. Let's again not pretend otherwise. I think you and I both know he gets in because of the Champagne Socialists and a vast number of non native people who have the right to vote given to them by a country that has given them so much for nothing back. He is also the only politician in London who refuses to acknowledge the scale of rape gangs in London. Why is that?
Fuck me, have a word with the patriots that have difficulty conversing in anything resembling English.
 
Is patriot now a dirty word?
It is now another word used to try and shut down anyone who disagrees with them as they have overused, racist, fascist etc. so they have no stigma or power.

Basically a 'Patriot' is anyone who sees that multi cultralism has failed and wants a change. They see you as less intelligent than them, bovver boots and a swastika on your forehead. It is of course easier to shut down rather than debate so it is the stock reply rather than have any actual answers.
 
Says the bloke who can't even bring himself to condemn the Greens vile garbage that the Manchester Arena bombing was the fault of the Manchester public, the very parents grieving the loss of their children.
AHH bless, my new stalker is back. What's this got to do with London "falling"?

London is a shithole. You have your head in the sand.
Which idyllic part of Essex do you live in where there's obviously no litter, graffiti, crime or anyone slightly off-white?
 
Not my words but written about London by someone who actually lives and works here:
London has long been the mirror through which Britain sees itself. Today that reflection is being deliberately distorted. No city in modern Britain has been more misrepresented, more cynically weaponised, or more dishonestly described than London has been by the far right.

They call it unsafe and chaotic, overrun by crime and migration. They claim whole districts have been lost to “no-go zones,” that the capital has fallen to disorder, that its diversity has weakened it. These are lies created to serve a purpose. When facts cannot sustain an ideology, fear becomes their substitute.

For those of us who live here, we know the truth is the opposite. London’s homicide rate is at its lowest since records began. Violent crime has fallen across every borough. The city is safer than Paris, Brussels, Berlin or Madrid. Walk through Tower Hamlets, Brixton or Tottenham and you find no Sharia patrols or forbidden quarters, only people living their lives in one of the most vibrant and creative cities on earth. The far right depends on myth because reality refutes them.

London’s diversity is not a weakness to be managed, it is a strength that sustains it. Its global culture, its languages, its food, its art and its tolerance are what make it a world city while others decline. That strength unsettles those who need division to thrive. They cannot build a movement on hope, so they turn to resentment. They take familiar symbols of Britain and twist them into warnings against difference.

What they call concern about crime is really an effort to control how people live and who belongs. Every fabricated “no-go zone” or exaggerated statistic is a political tool, designed to pit neighbour against neighbour and present diversity as decay. The goal is to make fear feel patriotic and whilst this is happening across the country, it’s particularly prevelant in London.

Sadiq Khan sits at the centre of that campaign. The far right and much of the Conservative press use him as a vessel for their anger towards London itself. They accuse him of destroying the city, of siding with extremists, of caring more for Muslims than for the rest of its residents. They circulate fantasies of “Londonistan” and “third-world chaos” to turn his faith into a political weapon. Yet the voters who know this city best have rejected that story again and again. Khan has been elected three times, in 2016, 2021 and 2024, each time by clear margins.

He remains the first and only mayor to win three terms, supported by more than a million Londoners in every election. His victories have come despite the noise, despite the smears, and despite relentless attempts to make him a symbol of decline. Londoners know what they see each day. The city is working, and Khan remains part of that success, not the cause of its problems.

Now, Reform and others are building their message on a lie. They want to turn London into a symbol of everything they claim has gone wrong with Britain. They call it a hell hole to make diversity look like decay, to convince people that a city full of difference cannot work. None of it is true. Their story is not about London at all but about how to divide the rest of the country from it. They need resentment more than they need answers, and they have built their politics around that need.

I have lived in London for years and I know their story is false. I have lived in Woolwich, the Isle of Dogs and Uxbridge, in neighbourhoods that show the city’s scale and variety. I see London each day in the early rush of commuters, in the shopkeepers opening shutters, in the conversations between strangers who will never meet again. It is a city held together by shared purpose, not fear. That is what the far right cannot bear. London’s resilience cuts through everything they claim to stand for. It proves that people from different backgrounds can live and build together, and that cooperation always wins over fear. The far right cannot accept that truth because it ends their story. They rely on division to survive, and they will go on spreading resentment until they are stopped.
😀😀😀😀😀😀
 
The Essex lot are bad but the ones from Suffolk and Norfolk are the ones to watch - they try to bring their chickens without buying a ticket
 
AHH bless, my new stalker is back. What's this got to do with London "falling"?


Which idyllic part of Essex do you live in where there's obviously no litter, graffiti, crime or anyone slightly off-white?
Condemn or condone? Still can't do it can you? How does it go "Deflect/Play Book' etc etc. Take a look in the mirror.
 
It is now another word used to try and shut down anyone who disagrees with them as they have overused, racist, fascist etc. so they have no stigma or power.

Basically a 'Patriot' is anyone who sees that multi cultralism has failed and wants a change. They see you as less intelligent than them, bovver boots and a swastika on your forehead. It is of course easier to shut down rather than debate so it is the stock reply rather than have any actual answers.
You’re forgetting “Protecting are women”…when so many patriots also have previous for domestic violence.

On the contrary mentioning it isn’t ’shutting down’ - more making a generalisation like you & others have done.
 
Back
Top