Just a coincidence.

Also, if you want to get your lawyer involved, can you start a fresh thread and not sully my brilliant thread with your whinging and idle threats.
 
Kin grow up. You big girl’s blouse.
Look .

I have no problem being sworn at .(Happens all the time at home 😂 )

The constant use of the ‘c’ word, while boring, merely confirms the paucity of vocabulary and lack of intellectual veracity .

Though it remains against The Roofs own stated rules my skin is quite thick .

The issue being discussed is when abuse tips into threats and libellous accusations , should a line be drawn ?
I think it should , you clearly dont .

Suggest we can agree on that and let it lie for now
 
there's a sign at the top saying "Enter at your own risk", you did and now you cry fowl like a little girl. If youre so upset do something about it, not tell teacher, like a man, who's body you seem to be borrowing. On the other hand try and remember the saying "if you don't like the heat, get out of the kitchen" Grow up, or actually grow some, which is more apt l guess.. Pathetic !
 
there's a sign at the top saying "Enter at your own risk", you did and now you cry fowl like a little girl. If youre so upset do something about it, not tell teacher, like a man, who's body you seem to be borrowing. On the other hand try and remember the saying "if you don't like the heat, get out of the kitchen" Grow up, or actually grow some, which is more apt l guess.. Pathetic !
There's also a terms and condition page which states You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise
 
There's also a terms and condition page which states You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise
Do you need a safe space?
 
There's also a terms and condition page which states You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise
well stick to them then troll, fucking pathetic hypocrites all you lot.

 
There's also a terms and condition page which states You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise
Daz, although on one level I sympathise with NWF, just please listen to yourself.

1. You are here. Why? Is it because you like something about this forum?
2. Look at what this forum is and has always been. Now go and look what you've posted about the formal rules:

"You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise."

3. How can we have a forum like this and AND follow those rules? The answer is, we can't. Just on the 'likely to offend' we are all fucked. And you've posted your share of 'offensive' stuff too, haven't you?

So...

4. Why don't we all admit it? They may be the written rules, but on the whole, no one has ever really tried to follow all of them. It's been an 'unspoken' and 'unwritten' agreement by just about anyone who's participated.

If people want to say that things have gone too far, then fine.

But citing those rules now, after breaking them from day one, doesn't work for me.
 
Tell you fucking well what, I'm gonna start pulling everything up and everyone that as accused me of being a racist if this is the path this child wants to go down he can drag half the board into it. That'll put about 10 of you on notice as well.
 
This is how good things get ruined. This is how they control you ultimately.

If you don't like what you read, don't read it, is a much healthier rule for life.
 
No I don’t get it. What am I supposed to get? There is no doubt about defamation. I haven’t directly mentioned suing anyone yet, just taking advice, but it’s an option. All in good time.
 
No I don’t get it. What am I supposed to get? There is no doubt about defamation. I haven’t directly mentioned suing anyone yet, just taking advice, but it’s an option. All in good time.
I wish you well NWF. But I think you've got this very wrong.
 
This is how good things get ruined. This is how they control you ultimately.

If you don't like what you read, don't read it, is a much healthier rule for life.
What good things are these? Am I part of “They“ now, trying to control you? Or just asking for a little respect when a line is crossed?
 
Daz, although on one level I sympathise with NWF, just please listen to yourself.

1. You are here. Why? Is it because you like something about this forum?
2. Look at what this forum is and has always been. Now go and look what you've posted about the formal rules:

"You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise."

3. How can we have a forum like this and AND follow those rules? The answer is, we can't. Just on the 'likely to offend' we are all fucked. And you've posted your share of 'offensive' stuff too, haven't you?

So...

4. Why don't we all admit it? They may be the written rules, but on the whole, no one has ever really tried to follow all of them. It's been an 'unspoken' and 'unwritten' agreement by just about anyone who's participated.

If people want to say that things have gone too far, then fine.

But citing those rules now, after breaking them from day one, doesn't work for me.
But that's the point Regi no one else has ever threatened to hang people or blow people up like bnet has. This is how radicalisation starts someone reads something someone has said and eventually acts on this. Its dangerous and violent behaviour. That's what people are worried about.
 
But that's the point Regi no one else has ever threatened to hang people or blow people up like bnet has. This is how radicalisation starts someone reads something someone has said and eventually acts on this. Its dangerous and violent behaviour. That's what people are worried about.
more libel. Keep them coming.

Thick skin me, but NWF as changed the game.
 
I thought you had set up a new thread to avoid spoiling this “classic”?
did you respect the women that you took photos of with their permission ? did you offer them a copy ? l guess not as you might have got the response that behaviour deserves, maybe she would call the police. So l guess you didn't and you know what the outcome might be.
 
more libel. Keep them coming.

Thick skin me, but NWF as changed the game.
You threaten people on a constant basis. Again I refer you to your thread "Hang them all". its only libel if it's not true and theres plenty witnesses on here can testify that at one time or other you have threatened them with violence.
 
did you respect the women that you took photos of with their permission ? did you offer them a copy ? l guess not as you might have got the response that behaviour deserves, maybe she would call the police. So l guess you didn't and you know what the outcome might be.
Women? What women? What planet are you on? Is any permission obtained reposting snaps of “bloke in a dress”? Do they know their images are being used for sneering purposes?
 
You threaten people on a constant basis. Again I refer you to your thread "Hang them all". its only libel if it's not true and theres plenty witnesses on here can testify that at one time or other you have threatened them with violence.
There is also a question of identity .
Being verbally abused isn’t pleasant but it’s what you can expect in a forum such as this sadly .

However being threatened with violence by a stranger is more troublesome . It many well be that bnet is a 95 year old on a zimmer frame or a 12 year old keyboard warrior who has neither the intention or ability to make good his the threats.

It maybe he is a middle aged man with a screw loose who would do so .

Most online threats are just that - threats .
But there are enough examples of violent attacks by radicalised individuals in our recent history to know a few of these are carried out .
 
Back
Top