Geronit!

that article is full of lies, as you would expect from the BBC. The most obvious being him being banned from social media after the Capitol building incident, which is a debatable lie in itself, but he was banned a long time before that, which is NOT debatable. There you have it from MSM !
 
Walthamstowfox said:
.He wasn't permanently banned until after the riot.
Click to expand...
he was, on l think Twitter. If you stop the president from talking to the country who elected him you have tyranny. It also tells you that the elected president is not running the country, hence no democracy.

This is not a political situation, thats just a part of their divide and conquer formula . It's state control, of which you can't have unless it's benevolent and we couldn't be more further removed from that.
 
Last edited:
A quote from a report l just read.

This was naked censorship: it involved no law courts and no democratic vote. It’s dangerous and no true liberal should support it. It might feel good now if your team has the upper hand but the principle of censoring your opponents is going to come back to haunt you. Next time it won’t be your friends who control the media platforms, it will be your enemies.
 
bnet said:
he was, on l think Twitter. If you stop the president from talking to the country who elected him you have tyranny. It also tells you that the elected president is not running the country, hence no democracy.

This is not a political situation, thats just a part of their divide and conquer formula . It's state control, of which you can't have unless it's benevolent and we couldn't be more further removed from that.
Click to expand...
Twitter can ban whoever it wants, nothing to do with state control.
Twitter banned Trump permanently after the riot.
 
Walthamstowfox said:
Twitter can ban whoever it wants, nothing to do with state control.
Twitter banned Trump permanently after the riot.
Click to expand...
l read that on all the Google search pages, l don't think its true actually. Google searches all show the MSM only so, if memory serves me, he really was banned prior.

They are actually breaching the terms if they don't want to be treated as publishers (don't quote me on that as its something like that and its a while ago). They are not allow to censor and benefit from not being press, something they flaunt because the people controlling the regulations all have the same pay masters as them.

Free speech is a right in a free country and part of the constitution, its being trampled all over by these dictators. I refer you to the quote l copy and pasted above. Basically you take one persons rights away when its on your side, they will do it when its not.
 
Twitter can ban who they like and remove anything they want to. It is just a company.
Trump can do the same with his Untruth Antisocial platform...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top