FoxinRutland
Roofer
Looking online yesterday at all the City following sites, FB, twitter, FT etc, I don't think I have seen so much division in our fanbase about what formation and players we should play. Usually, there are only a couple of differences between what people are saying, but at the minute it is so divided.
Maddison seems to be the one that divides opinion the most on the players. I think it is quite clear that in a 4-2-3-1 he is pretty ineffective. Unless we play 3-5-2 IMO he shouldn't be starting. Who should replace him? Lots are saying Nacho and some calling for KDH.
Formation wise there are calls to stick with 4-2-3-1 but change players, go 3-5-2 as per last year and some saying 4-4-2 or 4-1-4-1.
It will be really interesting to see who he plays this Thursday. You would think that Vardy will be rested for Daka and Soumare will be included somewhere. Lookman will probably start for Barnes. Mind you, I haven't got a clue about how BR thinks, especially as when Man City scored on Saturday I thought, now change it, but there was no positive change for 10-15 minutes.
What do I know? Bugger all
Maddison seems to be the one that divides opinion the most on the players. I think it is quite clear that in a 4-2-3-1 he is pretty ineffective. Unless we play 3-5-2 IMO he shouldn't be starting. Who should replace him? Lots are saying Nacho and some calling for KDH.
Formation wise there are calls to stick with 4-2-3-1 but change players, go 3-5-2 as per last year and some saying 4-4-2 or 4-1-4-1.
It will be really interesting to see who he plays this Thursday. You would think that Vardy will be rested for Daka and Soumare will be included somewhere. Lookman will probably start for Barnes. Mind you, I haven't got a clue about how BR thinks, especially as when Man City scored on Saturday I thought, now change it, but there was no positive change for 10-15 minutes.
What do I know? Bugger all
