Angela Rayner. David Lammy. Corbyn. McDonell. Abbott.
- Thread starter Pen4
- Start date
hackneyfox
Roofer
You wouldn't be happy if someone corrected you.
How do you know?
Where they there?
If they were , as they should have been as i am sure you will agree (?) then all is good and we all move on.
hackneyfox
Roofer
Yes
Sadly
But not surprised.
Sadly
But not surprised.
AFCDorset
Roofer
Neither am I, they are members of the Labour Party after all.
The party of 'kinder, gentler politics'.
soupsandwich
Roofer
And also, I'm sure, you meant to apologize in advance for the lack of grasp of the different uses and spellings of the various words that to you sound like were, where we're.
Richardvanles
Roofer
This Jeremy Corbyn?
S
SardiniaFox
Guest
And had they turned up they would almost certainly have been called hypocrites.
soupsandwich
Roofer
You,';,re welcome
Club_B00k_Crutchless
Registered
Well, it is approaching poppy wearing season so this is a nice little warm up exercise.
Have you got a source for this?
bnet
Roofer
always poncing !
Club_B00k_Crutchless
Registered
Well he's clearly complicit, what punishment do you think he should face?
Is there a list of attendees & non-attendees? Be good to see it.
Walthamstowfox
Roofer
Illegal mayor!!!!
What's going off, have I missed something?
There isn't.
If they had spoken any warm words it would have been noted in Hansard at 8 am this morning
They didn't speak
Rayner should have been next to Starmer. She wasn't on any of the stills that I have seen.
I'm unsurprised
So there's a possibility they were there, but didn't speak. As you've stated, attendance is not recorded.
According to Hansard, tributes started at 3.30pm, & the following number of MPs spoke:
Conservatives - 16 (including Johnson)
Labour - 10
SNP, LD, DUP & PC - 5
House adjourned at 5.36pm
These are the facts & figures. Given there are 650 MPs, everyone giving their thoughts would've taken some time. There's also at least one mention of the Speaker urging those providing tributes to be brief.
She was not sitting next to Starmer. She is his Deputy. She always sits next to him.
The energy you are investing in this suggests you know there is a story here lol
For sure, you definitely don't have an angle on this. It took me 3 minutes to detail the stuff from Hansard, so worry about your time - don't fret about mine.
I have an angle - she wasn't there
Walthamstowfox
Roofer
The OP is rather strange. FIrstly, name some MP's & say they weren't there.
Then, in the next breath, say you're happy to be corrected.
Why start a thread in the first place if you're not sure?
Then, in the next breath, say you're happy to be corrected.
Why start a thread in the first place if you're not sure?
I'm sure she'd be pleased to provide you with an explanation if you ask. Although asking the whereabouts of an MP in the current climate may set some alarm bells off...
bnet
Roofer
So Pen4 as some doubts that 5 prominent MP's didn't do the expected thing and show their respects. He obviously hasn't pulled it out of thin air. It seems a perfectly reasonably question doesn't it. He also says he's prepared to be corrected if his assumption is wrong.
Surely nothing to set you lot off is it. If you felt genuinely strongly about this being untrue and it was that important to you I'd expect you to show evidence that they were there and being respectful. No ?
The trouble seems that you don't want it to be true and even if it is (of which l don't know or care) you want to deny it or hide it.
Theres a certain amount of dishonesty here by the looks of it.
If its untrue, then why don't you make the effort (dirty word is effort l guess) and show it to Pen4.
Surely that is the answer isn't it, or is it that they were actually disrespectful and you don't want it known ?
Surely nothing to set you lot off is it. If you felt genuinely strongly about this being untrue and it was that important to you I'd expect you to show evidence that they were there and being respectful. No ?
The trouble seems that you don't want it to be true and even if it is (of which l don't know or care) you want to deny it or hide it.
Theres a certain amount of dishonesty here by the looks of it.
If its untrue, then why don't you make the effort (dirty word is effort l guess) and show it to Pen4.
Surely that is the answer isn't it, or is it that they were actually disrespectful and you don't want it known ?
A bit of a kerfuffle about Johnson, Sunak & Raab not present at the minute’s silence for David Amess yesterday.
Punctuality is so over-rated isn’t it?
