Acceptable Sources of Information

Yet, not one of the gang have come up and offered us one single credible source that we can use.

I can give you a massive list of ones that are not credible, but then again I'm an honest man.

BBC
Wiki
Google
CNN
Fox
Sky
ITV
Every "newspaper" in the world
Boris
Parliment
House of Lords
NHS
Your GP
School Boards
Facebook
Twitter

could do this all day, but l just want one from the deniers ! just one !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Yet, not one of the gang have come up and offered us one single credible source that we can use.

I can give you a massive list of ones that are not credible, but then again I'm an honest man.

BBC
Wiki
Google
CNN
Fox
Sky
ITV
Every "newspaper" in the world
Boris
Parliment
House of Lords
NHS
Your GP
School Boards
Facebook
Twitter

could do this all day, but l just want one from the deniers ! just one !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A few questions:

1. Fox - you mean the ones that were so supportive of Trump?

2. Don't members of your family work for the NHS? So you don't trust them either?

3. And what did George Clinton ever do that was wrong for Parliament to be included?
 
A few questions:

1. Fox - you mean the ones that were so supportive of Trump?

2. Don't members of your family work for the NHS? So you don't trust them either?

3. And what did George Clinton ever do that was wrong for Parliament to be included?
He was one of the US founding fathers I believe
 
Yet, not one of the gang have come up and offered us one single credible source that we can use.

I can give you a massive list of ones that are not credible, but then again I'm an honest man.

BBC
Wiki
Google
CNN
Fox
Sky
ITV
Every "newspaper" in the world
Boris
Parliment
House of Lords
NHS
Your GP
School Boards
Facebook
Twitter

could do this all day, but l just want one from the deniers ! just one !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So regarding the BBC when they showed the protests for Covid in the Netherlands and Belgium we're not to believe that?
 
So regarding the BBC when they showed the protests for Covid in the Netherlands and Belgium we're not to believe that.



I know that your thick, but surely you know that they all publish some truth, they have too, so that you believe the lies... Why am l even explaining this to you ffs, probably that you are ruining a thread again with stupid comments.



Just go away and let a grown discussion take place please.


I'll buy you a Dime Bar if you be a good boy.
 
A few questions:

1. Fox - you mean the ones that were so supportive of Trump?

2. Don't members of your family work for the NHS? So you don't trust them either?

3. And what did George Clinton ever do that was wrong for Parliament to be included?
1. shills if you can't see it, controlled opposition. Fools a lot that one so don't feel totally silly !

2. who's talking about individuals ? but you know that I'm talking about organisations - just like Daz you are being very silly because thats all you have.

3. I'm up for the down stroke and might, tear the roof of the sucker.
 
WHY ARE YOU ALL SO RELUCTANT TO GIVE US ONE ?????

for me it proves that you are all covering up, as you know the truth about this shit show but daren't admit what you really know...
 
Given your list I assume that bitchute is now the sole reliable source of information?
 
Well I am sure Jackie and Dickie will be sad to hear you don't regard Twitter as valid.
 
Sardine, put the matches down and give me a credible source, how about Public Health Scotland ? yes or no on that one please.
I don't trust anyone but I know a source of utter horseshit when I see one.
 
Given your list I assume that bitchute is now the sole reliable source of information?
its the vehicle for information and uncensored.

Just because it on Bitchute I don't give it credibility, l just know that its uncensored..

Black as a lot of shades between itself and White, did you know that ?
 
its the vehicle for information and uncensored.

Just because it on Bitchute I don't give it credibility, l just know that its uncensored..

Black as a lot of shades between itself and White, did you know that ?
It's uncensored because a lot of barmy people i.e like disgraced scientists put things on there.
 
just by saying "it ain't" doesn't make it true. Just like saying "you said it...." doesn't mean anything other than saying "it ain't".
Did you get that from Bitchute? It’s “uncensored” - all the rebels must gather there, so it must be true.
 
The science on Covid -18 is constantly changing and difficult to understand for us mere mortals .

Frightened people looking for easy answers are easy meat for exploitative conspiracy theorists trying to make a quick buck in pseudo science video crowd funders .

Stick with the science . Ignore the politicians and the social media “ experts”
 
The science on Covid -18 is constantly changing and difficult to understand for us mere mortals .

Frightened people looking for easy answers are easy meat for exploitative conspiracy theorists trying to make a quick buck in pseudo science video crowd funders .

Stick with the science . Ignore the politicians and the social media “ experts”
" the science". you wind up merchant twat:ROFLMAO:
 
seems that this only applies to what suits some's agenda.

Its the "attack the sources credibility of the source " if you don't like the info, going on here, thats amongst the deniers of everything' s little posse's way.

All standard lefty stuff.

Can we have a list please ?

I've ask Daz because he instantly knows what is not a credible source but somehow can't tell me what is !

I've ask him 3 times and hes just ignored the question.
"The guardian - that is definitely not a credible source of information, it is a tool of the hierarchy 100% to promote their agenda. Everything is to lead you one way if you didn't know, but perhaps thats just what you want, confirmation bias not truth, its comfy for most,"

Quote from a lefty there.
 
Why is it that all these daft cunts on here can tell us what source isn't credible but can't give us an example of what is. Plain dishonesty that why.
 
Back
Top