Higher_Power_Fox
Roofer
I wonder if any of them brave souls will be visiting Mecca any time soon.
Fattist AND assuming someone’s gender. Bookclub will go into meltdown.Legs 11, two fat ladies 88, maggies den number 10. HOUSE.
TutFattist AND assuming someone’s gender. Bookclub will go into meltdown.
Stop being a miserable bastard, that was funny.
If it's a scam, who's making money from it? Not sure the JSO hoodies are selling that well.The whole thing is a scam.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Ice_Age_Temperature.png
Car manufacturers selling EVs to the virtue signalling gullible for starters.If it's a scam, who's making money from it? Not sure the JSO hoodies are selling that well.
It's an expensive way to virtue signal. Still more profit in petro-chemical industries.Car manufacturers selling EVs to the virtue signalling gullible for starters.
‘virtue signalling’ means you’ve lost me already, horrible, lazy phrase and probably used by the likes of Nutella Braverman.Car manufacturers selling EVs to the virtue signalling gullible for starters.
Somebody, like last summer, will mention that they’re grandad survived similar temperatures whilst sat in a trench at El Alamain, conveniently forgetting that he was a fighting fit 19 year old.48.8 degrees C forecast for Italy next week. That would be the highest temperature ever recorded in Europe.
And some people still pretend it's a con.
I do get the appeal of saying all will be fine - the reality is terrifying if you dwell on it for too long.
It’s a fact that “going green” always cost us money and little black kids lives. Which, incidentally, the three of you fuckers have kept quiet about when challenged, so jump off your high hobby horse. It’s ambre solaire and Speedos all the way for me, enjoy it while it lasts.You should get yourself a platform to inform 100% of climate scientists that they are wrong.
100% .
It's not an opinion, it's a fact (incidentally it's a fact endorsed by the oil companies, who knew it over 50 years ago, accurately predicted the impacts we see today, but kept quiet. If you want a bone fide conspiracy, there it is).
What is the 'fact' though?You should get yourself a platform to inform 100% of climate scientists that they are wrong.
100% .
It's not an opinion, it's a fact (incidentally it's a fact endorsed by the oil companies, who knew it over 50 years ago, accurately predicted the impacts we see today, but kept quiet. If you want a bone fide conspiracy, there it is).
You should get yourself a platform to inform 100% of climate scientists that they are wrong.
100% .
It's not an opinion, it's a fact (incidentally it's a fact endorsed by the oil companies, who knew it over 50 years ago, accurately predicted the impacts we see today, but kept quiet. If you want a bone fide conspiracy, there it is).
I've lost you already? Somehow I know I'll get through.‘virtue signalling’ means you’ve lost me already, horrible, lazy phrase and probably used by the likes of Nutella Braverman.
I'm sure you will and perhaps you'll somehow explain temperatures of 48 degrees next week or was that forecast back in 1650?I've lost you already? Somehow I know I'll get through.
Do we ALL have to stop using fossil fuels? That's probably almost impossible, we do need to change our habits and the yanks and chinese need to massively reign in theirs.So how do we ALL stop using fossil fuels?
Not shipping billions of doses of a killer “vaccine” around the world that we didn’t need would have helped.Maybe we could put pictures of armageddon on petrol pumps.
I'm glad this board wasn't around in 1976 you'd have sold up and be waiting to die on Beacon Hill. Also, can you 'somehow explain' all the hottest temperatures ever recorded bit when we've been recording temperature for how long exactly? A miniscule percentage of even the recent past. But this is classic shut down of debate, funding for research is only given to those who will reach the right conclusion. Einstein proved much of Newton's Law to be wrong, today he would be labelled a 'Denier'.I'm sure you will and perhaps you'll somehow explain temperatures of 48 degrees next week or was that forecast back in 1650?