Just a coincidence.

North West pervert, same to you back your rubbish up or show us you're photos so we can send them to the relevant people.
 
Last edited:
Another one for my libel lawyer to deal with. Sounds like his family will be having a good Christmas.

Disgusting stuff . Just when you think these ignorant fools have reached rock bottom they find another level of the sewer they inhabit .
 
I'm sure the Police and anti terrorism folks would be a lot more interested in the libellous insults and radicalised stuff and threats of violence on yours, Mr. Bnet.
I think it would go something like...

1. Terrorism
2. Perverted Nonce Stuff
...
99. Bnet being slightly threatening on a football conspiracy forum
100. Being mean to a kitten up a tree
 
I have no need to video any such discourse. It will be dealt with in the usual way in due course.
Can anyone tell me how this works?
We have a group of posters who are constantly taking the piss out of each other.
If they're not being personal about the other board member, they're constantly jumping in to rubbish any thread that one of them starts. I can imagine that it can get annoying for all of people involved.

Here's my question, if you're going to threaten legal action and the closure of the message board, why indulge in all of this in the first place?
 
Can anyone tell me how this works?
We have a group of posters who are constantly taking the piss out of each other.
If they're not being personal about the other board member, they're constantly jumping in to rubbish any thread that one of them starts. I can imagine that it can get annoying for all of people involved.

Here's my question, if you're going to threaten legal action and the closure of the message board, why indulge in all of this in the first place?
You raise a good question. There are (were) some good debates on here and some interesting topics on here. It's normal that people have differing opinions but the board seems to be polarising into two camps. I am generally civil to people on here and expect a bit of banter, but it has got to the point where personal insults from a small but vocal number have been extrapolated way beyond the truth and have long since crossed the line. If they had any self awareness they would know it. I could just walk away and leave them to their echo chamber letting them to channel more of their vile vitriol to other members on here, many of whose posta are reasonable and politely expressed. We all paid our subs to the Site so all have signed up to the rules which are clearly posted. They are in clear breach of the Site rules so we will see what happens. There are we established protocols, that don't necessarily mean closure of the board if people stick to the rules they signed up to.
(Edited to correct spelling and grammar)
 
Last edited:
You raise a good question. There are (were) some good debates on here and some interesting topics on here. It's Inornl that people have differing opinions and the board seems to be polarising into two camps. I am generally civil to people on here and expect a bit of banter, but it has got to the point where personal insults have been estrpolated way beyond tandhe truth and have long since crossed the line and if they had any self awareness they would know it. I could just walk away and leave them to their echo chamber and leave them to channel more of their vile vitriol to other members on here. We all paid our subs to the Site so all have signed up to the rules They are in clear breach of the Site rules so we will see what happens. There are we established protocols, that don't necessarily mean closure of the board if people stick to the rules they signed up to.
Like I wrote the other week... We've all created a zoo. With that in mind, you must know that it wasn't the best idea to share what you shared. But there it is. I don't know what you're going to get out of this. (Probably a good question for all of us.) I'd let it go if I were you.
 
Like I wrote the other week... We've all created a zoo. With that in mind, you must know that it wasn't the best idea to share what you shared. But there it is. I don't know what you're going to get out of this. (Probably a good question for all of us.) I'd let it go if I were you.
Ive admitted it was a stupid but innocent thing to do to post a totally legal pic of a fully clothed member of the public on here from the back and continued to get crucified for it. I’ve tried to let it go on many occasions, but it seems to be the easy option for those with no decent answer to deflect rather than address the topic. What was dismissive goading has now far crossed the line and become very defamatory. Despite the “enter at own risk” strapline, the board has clear rules which are being clearly and constantly violated.
 
Glad you’re amused. Typos are so easy to miss when posting.
Yeah yeah, seeing as you’ve announced you’ve corrected it for spelling and grammar you might want to have another go.

Out of amused interest, who are you and your top team of libel lawyers suing?
 
Yeah yeah, seeing as you’ve announced you’ve corrected it for spelling and grammar you might want to have another go.

Out of amused interest, who are you and your top team of libel lawyers suing?
Out of amused interest do you think it’s acceptable for people to be accused of rape and paedophilia or threatened with
violence or even death on this site ?
Is it within the sites own rules ?

I suspect it’s the failure of the administration to take action to prevent this material where any case would lie, as it is a clear violation of the boards rules and probably illegal .

Spreading misinformation in a public health emergency may be dangerous and morally indefensible but not illegal . There are agencies who deal in radicalisation who I am sure will take an interest .

We can all take a bit of flak and all expect a football site to contain some abusive language (though most try to avoid it)

No one should feel unsafe as a result of using social media though, and that a few of us refuse to be bullied off the board by a small minority of unpleasant characters should be supported by admin .
 
Out of amused interest do you think it’s acceptable for people to be accused of rape and paedophilia or threatened with
violence or even death on this site ?
Is it within the sites own rules ?

I suspect it’s the failure of the administration to take action to prevent this material where any case would lie, as it is a clear violation of the boards rules and probably illegal .

Spreading misinformation in a public health emergency may be dangerous and morally indefensible but not illegal . There are agencies who deal in radicalisation who I am sure will take an interest .

We can all take a bit of flak and all expect a football site to contain some abusive language (though most try to avoid it)

No one should feel unsafe as a result of using social media though, and that a few of us refuse to be bullied off the board by a small minority of unpleasant characters should be supported by admin .
Silly cunt.
 
It ain’t fucking compulsory. Don’t use it if you don’t like it.
I know .Many don’t now .

But I enjoy a bit of ‘robust’ debate and genuinely believe dangerous fake information should be challenged by those on the side of the angels or it spreads unchecked .

Still think violent threats and vile libellous accusations have no place here . You clearly do .
 
It ain’t fucking compulsory. Don’t use it if you don’t like it.
You run a site, which has clearly posted rules then ignore them When your “mates” violate them. The solution should be simple, but somehow you can’t or more likely don‘t want to see it.
 
You run a site, which has clearly posted rules then ignore them When your “mates” violate them. The solution should be simple, but somehow you can’t or more likely don‘t want to see it.
My mates?

You don’t get it do you?

Who are you suing?
 
Back
Top