The woke wankers cried

Foxgolfer said:
And there ladies and gentlemen is one mad radicalised bastard . Dangerously unhinged . Hopefully the powers that be have him on a watch list .
Click to expand...
But forcing people who do not share you views and embrace the jab to work in covid wards without protection?

That is perfectly OK apparently.
 
AFCDorset said:
But forcing people who do not share you views and embrace the jab to work in covid wards without protection?

That is perfectly OK apparently.
Click to expand...
To clarify .I do not believe that . If a year or so ago I posted such a thing I apologise and suspect it was in response to a particularly ridiculous claim that coronavirus was “ like the flu” or some such rubbish .
I wish no one to come to harm through the misinformation posted on here mainly by the two clowns bnet and dickie
It is blindingly obvious the vaccines while not perfect have saved thousands from serious illness and disease. you significantly reduce that risk if vaccinated .
If you choose not to you are putting yourself at great risk , particularly if you are elderly or clinically vulnerable .
It’s not that difficult to grasp .
 
Incidentally no one is forcing anyone be vaccinated. If you choose not to you choose to impose certain restrictions on your life until the situation improves . Sadly 6 million remain unvaccinated so it may take longer than necessary for the sickness to work through .
 
Foxgolfer said:
Incidentally no one is forcing anyone be vaccinated. If you choose not to you choose to impose certain restrictions on your life until the situation improves . Sadly 6 million remain unvaccinated so it may take longer than necessary for the sickness to work through .
Click to expand...
It is called coercion Fg. I know it, you know it.
 
as i understand it, these camps are their version of our quarantine hotels.
and they are mandatory for fully vaccinated and un-vaccinated alike. no discrimination.
 
SardiniaFox said:
I'll take that as a no then. And that means it isn't generally accepted and you are just being a lying cunt again.
Click to expand...
l don't lie, but you are to dumb to work that out.

Keep the home fires burning, !!! well your neighbours crops and farm buildings anyway, they'll lynch you when they find out.

Is that why you had to leave Britain ?
 
bnet said:
l don't lie, but you are to dumb to work that out.

Keep the home fires burning, !!! well your neighbours crops and farm buildings anyway, they'll lynch you when they find out.

Is that why you had to leave Britain ?
Click to expand...
You really are a joke aren't you?
 
AFCDorset said:
In 1933, the first camps were set up to 'protect' people, mostly Jews who were at serious risk of being attacked and even killed by 'the mob' of mostly ordinary people, stirred up by the Sturmabteilung.

In fact most of the earliest occupants were there because they had been the subject of 'Protective Custody Orders', they were locked up for their own protection and the protection of others. Sound familiar?

Mass killings of Jews and other civilians did not really start until 1941, mostly in occupied Eastern Europe. It was not really formalised until early 1942. For legal reasons the extermination camps were not built on German soil.
Click to expand...
I've been reading some interesting stuff about 6 million jews in Russia 6 or 7 years before WW2. History isn't what they tell us. I also read sometime ago that it would have been impossible for the Huns to kill 6 million jews in the time that they had surpose to have with the camps they used.
Everything is a lie.
 
bnet said:
I've been reading some interesting stuff about 6 million jews in Russia 6 or 7 years before WW2. History isn't what they tell us. I also read sometime ago that it would have been impossible for the Huns to kill 6 million jews in the time that they had surpose to have with the camps they used.
Everything is a lie.
Click to expand...
Correction - everything you post is a lie .
 
bnet said:
I've been reading some interesting stuff about 6 million jews in Russia 6 or 7 years before WW2. History isn't what they tell us. I also read sometime ago that it would have been impossible for the Huns to kill 6 million jews in the time that they had surpose to have with the camps they used.
Everything is a lie.
Click to expand...
Prior to WW2 the communists killed millions, for all kinds of reasons, mostly ideological or racial. They were every bit as vile and evil as the Nazi's but as socialists and one of the 'winners' they have been allowed to get away with it, to a degree.

You can mess about with the death tolls in the Nazi camps, but the evidence that millions died is overwhelming. There were just 4 purpose built extermination camps and 2, including Auschwitz that were combined work/death camps.

The number of deaths in those camps were around 3-4 million. The entire Nazi machine killed far more, in work camps, summary executions and myriads of other 'camps'. I do not think that 12 million overall is an unreasonable number.

The death toll in the Soviet Union in the same period were equally huge, the Holomodor alone accounted for a similar number of deaths as the 6 Nazi death camps combined.
 
The Communists and Nazi's were both scum of the earth.

Proof if ever needed, that either extreme is against humanity.
 
AFCDorset said:
Prior to WW2 the communists killed millions, for all kinds of reasons, mostly ideological or racial. They were every bit as vile and evil as the Nazi's but as socialists and one of the 'winners' they have been allowed to get away with it, to a degree.

You can mess about with the death tolls in the Nazi camps, but the evidence that millions died is overwhelming. There were just 4 purpose built extermination camps and 2, including Auschwitz that were combined work/death camps.

The number of deaths in those camps were around 3-4 million. The entire Nazi machine killed far more, in work camps, summary executions and myriads of other 'camps'. I do not think that 12 million overall is an unreasonable number.

The death toll in the Soviet Union in the same period were equally huge, the Holomodor alone accounted for a similar number of deaths as the 6 Nazi death camps combined.
Click to expand...
There was an interesting discussion on The Rest Is History podcast on Fascism (it was recorded ages ago but I only just listened) about why the two terrors (Soviet Communist and Nazi) are sometimes judged differently. Tom Holland's thesis is that it's to do with Christian ethics, but then again he thinks that's always the reason for anything.
 
sixthswan said:
The Communists and Nazi's were both scum of the earth.

Proof if ever needed, that either extreme is against humanity.
Click to expand...
they are the same extreme, the results are always identical.

Communisn was sponsored by the British royal family to steal the richest family in the worlds money, the Tsar's.

Marx wrote it up for them. So, who's a facist and who's a communist ?
 
bnet said:
they are the same extreme, the results are always identical.

Communisn was sponsored by the British royal family to steal the richest family in the worlds money, the Tsar's.

Marx wrote it up for them. So, who's a facist and who's a communist ?
Click to expand...
“Communism was sponsored by the British Royal Family”
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Has to be the best line yet . Who writes this clowns material ?
 
bnet said:
they are the same extreme, the results are always identical.

Communisn was sponsored by the British royal family to steal the richest family in the worlds money, the Tsar's.

Marx wrote it up for them. So, who's a facist and who's a communist ?
Click to expand...
This seems a bit far-fetched to me.
 
SteveYork said:
This seems a bit far-fetched to me.
Click to expand...
once you start finding out about how we have been lied to and conned for over a hundred years, it doesn't. I daren't mention some of the stuff l have come across in the last couple of years going back to 1666 at least.

The origins on the Crown (not royalty) which is now the City of London and how it was paid for. Opium wars. East India Company,who owns Australia, Antarctica, Titanic,2 World Wars, the Fed, all central banks, the educational systems history an on an on, if you knew about some of these you wouldn't think its in the slightest bit far fetched Steve !!

plus I've not been wrong about anything I've said over the past year or two, never mind what the sausages say, I'm just their little battle really !

Trump won with 80% you will see this before much longer as they have uncovered something like 15million fraudulent votes so far. I've said this since the election. It makes no real difference to me with my grand bet, its a nice bit of money 29k but nothing changes if l don't get it.
 
AFCDorset said:
The death toll in the Soviet Union in the same period were equally huge, the Holomodor alone accounted for a similar number of deaths as the 6 Nazi death camps combined.
Click to expand...

Which is absolute garbage. The only serious bit of western scholarship on the famine was led by J. Arch Getty (yes, that family of Getty). With unlimited access to Soviet archives, they determined the famine was multi-regional (eliminating the claim that it targeted Ukrainians), Belarus suffering the most.

The Soviets did seal off the cities to prevent the rural population from flooding into urban centres and collapsing any foodstock supply left. Something similar happened in Cambodia, left unchecked with disastrous results.

The only real violence came from the liquidation of the Kulaks as a class, who were busy setting fire to any existing stockpiles in order to prevent them from falling into Party hands for distribution. In a region plagued with famine through its history, you could say the Soviets eliminated famine from the area for all time afterwards.
Victimisation can be a profitable thing for people sometimes.

I'm guessing you were a big Robert Conquest fan?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top