Why its intense on here

Daz, you're confused because you want to be confused. Dyche WAS offered the job and he accepted it that is 100% true and thats what l said. I also told you the reason why he didn't take charge. He wasn't allowed to bring his backroom staff who were chomping at the bit to come as they are locals and at least one of them a Leicester fan. Out of loyalty he changed his mind. Thats what l said and l posted because its the truth, what you said is not the truth, simple.

Trump won by taking 80%, this is a fact and will be proven soon whether you want to believe it or not. I don't care, you are totally irrellevent.

I honestly don't care what you you, you only deal in lies so why would anyone care ?
But he wasn't in charge so yes it was a lie, even if you say he accepted the job he wasn't in charge when players crossed the line. Trump didn't win by 80% though did he because if he did he would be President. Just admit it bnet you got these wrong or are you one of these people who can't admit you are wrong. What you say about World War 3, again this is just your opinion none of it is fact or has been proved by yourself. There's no shame in admitting you are wrong in fact I think people will take to you more if you admit that you were wrong. I have been wrong a few times on here and admitted that I was wrong. Plus here's a question for you then if this all a conspiracy and a false pandemic why did they choose to do it last year and not 5 or 10 years ago?
 
If you read the inside of a paracetamol pack you could jump to the conclusion big pharmacy want to kill us all .They don’t
 
I feel that Bnets summation at the start of the thread is, in general, a very reasonable explanation of where we are.

It is one explanation, not the only one certainly and perhaps not 100% correct in all the details, but an awful lot of it 'feels' right to me.

The people behind this are not people like us, they are sociopaths who care nothing for anything and anyone other than there own ends and are prepared to go to inconceivable (to us) lengths to make this happen.

I refer to this as an 'onion', with layers of deceit and manipulation over more layers of deceit and manipulation, designed deliberately to obscure what is at the core of all this. Population reduction seems to be at the heart of this, perhaps it will be selective, I really do not know.
 
That's the problem though you can't have an argument with him because he won't accept another point of view. An open minded individual would accept all other opinions. I'm sure a lot of people think this aswell.
And if you try to debate you get insulted. That isn't debate.
 
I feel that Bnets summation at the start of the thread is, in general, a very reasonable explanation of where we are.

It is one explanation, not the only one certainly and perhaps not 100% correct in all the details, but an awful lot of it 'feels' right to me.

The people behind this are not people like us, they are sociopaths who care nothing for anything and anyone other than there own ends and are prepared to go to inconceivable (to us) lengths to make this happen.

I refer to this as an 'onion', with layers of deceit and manipulation over more layers of deceit and manipulation, designed deliberately to obscure what is at the core of all this. Population reduction seems to be at the heart of this, perhaps it will be selective, I really do not know.
Question then IF it's to do with depopulation, how else can we put a stop to the rise in population rates as it's going to get to a stage where the world will be overcrowded due to people living longer?
 
I feel that Bnets summation at the start of the thread is, in general, a very reasonable explanation of where we are.

It is one explanation, not the only one certainly and perhaps not 100% correct in all the details, but an awful lot of it 'feels' right to me.

The people behind this are not people like us, they are sociopaths who care nothing for anything and anyone other than there own ends and are prepared to go to inconceivable (to us) lengths to make this happen.

I refer to this as an 'onion', with layers of deceit and manipulation over more layers of deceit and manipulation, designed deliberately to obscure what is at the core of all this. Population reduction seems to be at the heart of this, perhaps it will be selective, I really do not know.

Yes. There are sociopaths in high levels of power. They tend to be attracted to power. Deceit is definitely one of the hands that they play.

But you're right. Bnet was "not 100% correct in all the details." Which is where the problems start to arise.
 
Yes. There are sociopaths in high levels of power. They tend to be attracted to power. Deceit is definitely one of the hands that they play.

But you're right. Bnet was "not 100% correct in all the details." Which is where the problems start to arise.
Spot on . always a grain of truth which is then interpreted to fit the narrative . Hence it grows with zero empirical evidence.
 
Question then IF it's to do with depopulation, how else can we put a stop to the rise in population rates as it's going to get to a stage where the world will be overcrowded due to people living longer?
Left alone it is estimated that the worlds population will top out at around 10 billion, increased life expectancy and better basic healthcare will be balanced out by lower birthrates which tends to be a consequence of increased wealth. As I am sure you are aware, the indigenous population of this country has been in decline for years for much the same reasons, just think of that on a world wide scale.
Yes. There are sociopaths in high levels of power. They tend to be attracted to power. Deceit is definitely one of the hands that they play.

But you're right. Bnet was "not 100% correct in all the details." Which is where the problems start to arise.
Indeed, it all rather depends on just how far down the rabbit hole you are prepared to go. I suspect that I might be prepared to venture rather more than most, though I do try to hold on to my critical facilities.

On the other hand it might be something to do with all the dystopian SF novels read in my youth.
 
I think reading the comments we agree with some points but not all, that is how it should be in a debut. I think some very good inputs from all.(y)
 
I
I think reading the comments we agree with some points but not all, that is how it should be in a debut. I think some very good inputs from all.(y)
Agree Running Fox that's how it should be in a debate. I don't really think anyone is 100% sure what's going on.
 
eft alone it is estimated that the worlds population will top out at around 10 billion, increased life expectancy and better basic healthcare will be balanced out by lower birthrates which tends to be a consequence of increased wealth. As
Correct, so the depopulation theory using vaccines is a load of nonsense, but the fact that it will decrease naturally will enable the conspiracists to think they were right.
 
Correct, so the depopulation theory using vaccines is a load of nonsense, but the fact that it will decrease naturally will enable the conspiracists to think they were right.
Separate things and vastly different time scales.

The theory is that the vaccine will compromise your immune system making you more susceptible to any future 'wild' virus. If there is any truth in that it will be obvious within a very few years.

The 10 Billion maximum population is late this century, not remotely comparable.
 
Separate things and vastly different time scales.

The theory is that the vaccine will compromise your immune system making you more susceptible to any future 'wild' virus. If there is any truth in that it will be obvious within a very few years.

The 10 Billion maximum population is late this century, not remotely comparable.
The projection is to peak at 9.7bn in 2064 so not quite so far away, although most of the conspiracists will have died from some high-blood pressure related death due to the constant anger and rage.
 
Trump won by taking 80%, this is a fact and will be proven soon whether you want to believe it or not. I don't care, you are totally irrellevent.
With so much info from the inside, when will this be proven?

And when I mean proven I mean factually, not just by a person repeating it over & over again, in the hope that others start to nod along to it...like sheep.
 
Back to the Trump bet. When is deadline day?

"Early April is the dead line, not negotiable, not up for discussion."
Bnet
 
I am looking forward to April 20th when I lose my bet and don't have to log on any more....
ok, a bets a bet and l personally think it will take longer than that now. l believe the job is massive. So basically you want me to disappear then. Why can't you ignore me, does this tell you more about yourself than me ?
 
So much going on here. 2 hours a day being radicalised. No wonder you're so entrenched with this stuff.

Look up the etymology of "drain the swamp". It goes back way beyond Trump.

Depopulation to 500m? As someone else has already said, China has a population over a billion alone. Do you seriously think they are on board with this global plan?
I will answer your bitter naive shit Noncebag,

Be pretty hard to self radicalise would it ?

Drain the Swamp was used and is still being used by Trump, l didn't say he was the first to se it, did l ?

Depopulation, its been talked about for years, theres mountains of info on it and plenty been posted on here, They are not hiding this, but l guess they have from you. You do not understand how the world works, if you are thinking that we have self governing independant countries then you think like a child. The CCP is behind the coup d'etat in the US supported by the CIA MI5 Mossad and the Crown. This will be proven as the US judiciary is corrupted and when they fail to do their job, the military will step in and bring democracy back. If this doesn't happen the world is fucked.

I see you have no knowledge of what is really going on, yet you still comment.
 
You write complete crap. You're the "huffity" and "defensive" one on here.

In all honesty; you need to seek professional help. If you're just on a wind-up, then you're a very sad man.
i'm sad !!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok 🤣

Says the man who as nothing to do all day but comment on every post on here, l guess youre a prick on other forums. I'm Sad, ffs

You have never wrote anything of interest on this board, you just fill the spaces up you fucking freak.
 
your bitter naive shit Noncebag
And here we are again with childish insults. Most people seem to be able to engage in a debate without resorting to it.
This will be proven as the US judiciary is corrupted
Will it be proven by the same people who are about to prove Trump won the election?
I see you have no knowledge of what is really going on, yet you still comment.
You think you know what's going on. You've gone down the rabbit hole and been radicalised. You've fallen for it hook, line and sinker. My opinion is different to yours. No need to cry about it petal x
 
Last edited:
l said that are you a prat ? l meant parrot ! What do you want me to do, remind me which bet this is with that date one it ?

 
i'm sad !!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok 🤣

Says the man who as nothing to do all day but comment on every post on here, l guess youre a prick on other forums. I'm Sad, ffs

You have never wrote anything of interest on this board, you just fill the spaces up you fucking freak.

Touché :rolleyes:
 
That wasn't him. He can't prove it at the moment but it's already well known it wasn't him. He just needs more time but it will all come out.
 
you say question everything, so i've got two for you.

if the aim is to reduce population to 1/2 billion, then you need china onboard. they are already emerging as the global superpower, so why would they jeopordise that by reducing their power - or why would other states (deep states) hasten that emergence by reducing their status and leaving china as #1? are there people within china pullng the same strings that are being pulled in western countries? or are they the architect of the whole thing?

my main question. why are most of your theories US centric? as a guy that for years had zero interest in politics, there is an awful lot in your messages that relates specifically to US politics (gun control, trump, clinton etc etc). how did that happen? how did you get drawn into arguments that are mostly to do with US domestic issues?
First of all you have to forget about countries, l know its hard but no country is independently run, democratic or communist, the governments have no power they are brought and paid for puppets. How come every country as done basically the same, with the odd exception like Tanzania, the President exposed this farce/scam and refused them to control his country. Now he is dead.

The Industrial/military complex which includes banks, pharma, oil and food run the world. That was broken by Trumps election and is still in the proccess of being dismantled, but the shit is going to hit the fan very soon. I can just tell you, wait !

There right now is two waring factions in China, one being the CCP which l believe are almost beat, t least l hope so. The 3 Gorges dam is possibly a key to how this will play out. The south China seas and Taiwan could well be the other thing to look for. I was with someone at a party from the MoD who had grade 2 clearance, he was half pissed l wasn't so l steared the conversation and this seemed to be the potential flash point.

The CCP are part of the architectural set up of this but so is the City of London and the Vatican (l know this will send the Herberts into a tail spin, but you ask).

The US is the last democracy standard, the EU IS the nazi party. Its true l had no interest in politics, but once you see certain things you can't unsee them. I'm obsessive so l have to get to the bottom of things. I already had knowlege of how the world as been manipulated for the last few hundred years, now l know it is longer.

Got to do some work, i'll come back to you...
 
Back
Top