Difficult. And I think you should allow for a cash adjustment if needed. But I reckon swapping Ricardo would get it done. I love the versatility that Castagne and Justin provideWho would you swap for Werner?
Yeah but it's Chelsea, I'm all for taking the piss at every opportunity. CaantsTo be fair to him, he was about an inch away from scoring a legit goal on Tuesday! There are many worse players to take the piss out of.
I wouldn't swap any of ours for chelski players, they over spent badly and if their results don't improve then lampard deserves the sack that's why I can't see brenda being interested in being manager there, we are capable at the moment to challenge the top teams in epl, have a fantastic training ground, what a time to be city fan, enjoy.Spent £165m on Werner, Chilwell and Havertz.
£36m for Ziyech is a bargain though.
full backs wasn't Chelsea problem it was their powder puff midfield.On last Tuesday's evidence, Chelsea desperately need an upgrade at the fullback position. We've got quality young full backs coming out of our ears.
How about a cheeky swap deal, with Werner coming here, and one of our fullbacks going there?
I think Werner would be an excellent long term replacement for Vardy - quick, plays on the last shoulder, natural goalscorer, completely messed up by Lampard playing him wide - a bit like JV when he first came to us.
Get it done JR
Agreed that Chelsea wouldn't actually do the deal, which I did describe at the outset as "cheeky" - but it's fun to speculateI think Werner would be decent for us, I do rate him, but there is no way Chelsea will let him go. Also what wages are Chelsea paying him? They’re pretty likely to be pricing us out of a deal.
We’re nowhere near being able to pay top dollar for any player, financial fair play puts paid to that, but in time it will come, if we want it to.
I think the odd cheeky bid for these players with some truth behind them would help to unsettle the oppo a little and give us some good publicity. Raise our profile a little.Agreed that Chelsea wouldn't actually do the deal, which I did describe at the outset as "cheeky" - but it's fun to speculate
Palace want more than 40 mill for him.If we get UCL, we should hit Palace with a 40mil bid for Zaha! He would tear it up for us and would allow Vardy to adapt his game in twilight of his career.
I totally agree with this, I think Ricardo will be the one we sacrifice in the Summer anyway.Replacing Vardy is going to be very difficult, and I think Werner is a strong candidate. I don't see us prising Mane or Son away from their current clubs, and they are in their respective primes, with valuations and wages to match
Werner is 24. He scored 78 goals in 127 games for RB Leipzig in the Bundesliga, between ages 20 and 23, and he has scored 15 in 35 for Germany. He has a great pedigree. And he is at the beginning of his prime years, not the middle or the end.
Currently, he's at a very low ebb. Chelsea haven't played with an "on the shoulder" no 9 in recent memory, and have no idea how to use one, so he had been very badly handled so far. He is a mismatch in that squad, and not helped by his current rookie manager.
I love Ricardo, he's the marquee player in our current squad. He would be highly valued by any club in Europe. But we have cover for him if he leaves; whereas we don't have like for like cover for Vardy, and we need to acquire it.
So, it's a deal I would do. It takes advantage of Werner's ability being camouflaged by his disaster so far at Chelsea, and would fill the biggest hole in our squad. We give up a great player, but one we have shown this season that we can manage without. Where would we have been without Vardy for 30 matches?