Old Hunter, the Big Man, the evidence

I would say he more likely got confused with parliament and local councils but there you go.....

Anyway wish i ant go involved with you, I find you most obnoxious. So I bid you FUCK OFF!
 
Bnet said 130 MPs. The list doesn’t show a single one. That’s not a “cheap point”, whatever that might mean, that’s showing the original statement to be totally and utterly false.
you're a desperate man. GAL
 
you're a desperate man. GAL
Maybe. At least I don’t post outright lies and then get my apologists to make excuses on my behalf, claiming that I don’t know the difference between 650 MPs and 20,000 councillors.
It’s like Pinky and Perky on here at times, though I’m not so sure who is pulling the strings.
 
Maybe. At least I don’t post outright lies and then get my apologists to make excuses on my behalf, claiming that I don’t know the difference between 650 MPs and 20,000 councillors.
It’s like Pinky and Perky on here at times, though I’m not so sure who is pulling the strings.
where did l claim anything ? l didn't, does that make you a liar ? of course it does. As l said you are a desperate man, add the word "sad" to that aswell. GAL
 
where did l claim anything ? l didn't, does that make you a liar ? of course it does. As l said you are a desperate man, add the word "sad" to that aswell. GAL
Where did you claim anything?

“What is it in parliament ? something like 130 on sex offender list or something, how as that ever been allowed surely anyone in a position of power should be white than white.”

That’s where.

Are you going to retract your silly claim, admit that at worst you were wholly inaccurate or just plain wrong, or just come back with a playground riposte?

Because
Nothing’s
Ever
True
 
Deary me. Pinky and Perky. Playground? :D
Come on now, so he might've got something not exactly right. So RunningFox might've misunderstood. (Which I see now re-reading that you knew all along and toyed with him.) I don't know. They might come back with some evidence and they might not have any. You might end up being proved absolutely right. That'll be nice.
But have a listen to yourself.
👜
 
Where did you claim anything?

“What is it in parliament ? something like 130 on sex offender list or something, how as that ever been allowed surely anyone in a position of power should be white than white.”

That’s where.

Are you going to retract your silly claim, admit that at worst you were wholly inaccurate or just plain wrong, or just come back with a playground riposte?

Because
Nothing’s
Ever
True
can you read you sad twat, it say" something like" i've read it but can't be bothered to find it, ive better things to do than try and prove a weird big nose carrot cruncher wrong... You obviously been offended by me in the past, the 'ol rent free stuff again ! Don't read my posts, its that simple, you've never won an argument yet you bitter no mark. "are you going to retract......." are you really that pathetic, it wasn't an allegation against you was it, truly a pathetic weirdo.
 
i'm getting threads mixed up possibly, you are that boring, you sad "l claim to have seen photos of HB snorting coke of a naked boy" That is a damn right lie isn't it Stamford !!!!!!!!!! would you like to retract that, i'm taking the piss sad cunt.
 
Deary me. Pinky and Perky. Playground? :D
Come on now, so he might've got something not exactly right. So RunningFox might've misunderstood. (Which I see now re-reading that you knew all along and toyed with him.) I don't know. They might come back with some evidence and they might not have any. You might end up being proved absolutely right. That'll be nice.
But have a listen to yourself.
👜
'so he might've got something not exactly right'
To anyone else but you, and Donald Trump that actually means 'he's wrong'.
'They might come back with some evidence'? What? so until they do we should assume there may be 130 or something MPs on the sex offenders list?
Have a listen to yourself. 😀
 
Back
Top