Alice Grant next PM
Registered
The Government have blocked the ONS from issuing data on how many have died after receiving the Covid Vax and how many have had side effects.Answers on a postcard please on why they have done this
I Wonder Why?
- Thread starter Alice Grant next PM
- Start date
AFCDorset
Roofer
The 'vaccine', you know the jab that does not stop you catching covid, does not stop you from passing it on and does not allow you to travel, live mask free or, make any attempt to get back to normal life.
The ONS has figures that suggest that roughly the same number of excess deaths will occur for non covid related issues as for covid related ones, some 220,000 deaths overall.
Given that the covid related deaths include huge numbers of fakes since the numbers are heavily manipulated, that is a large number of un-necessary deaths caused by the lockdown that have no direct links to covid.
The ONS has figures that suggest that roughly the same number of excess deaths will occur for non covid related issues as for covid related ones, some 220,000 deaths overall.
Given that the covid related deaths include huge numbers of fakes since the numbers are heavily manipulated, that is a large number of un-necessary deaths caused by the lockdown that have no direct links to covid.
sixthswan
Non-Member
Is there a source for the claim in the original post?
People will die from Covid after a vaccine. They aren't claimed to be 100% effective. Also there is supposed to be a time-lag, before "Immunity" kicks in. As with the flu, the vaccines also won't protect the same each year...as different strains emerge.
People will die from Covid after a vaccine. They aren't claimed to be 100% effective. Also there is supposed to be a time-lag, before "Immunity" kicks in. As with the flu, the vaccines also won't protect the same each year...as different strains emerge.
AFCDorset
Roofer
Perhaps such deaths could be listed as 'vaccine related' if they take place within 28 days of the injection. There might be a precedence for this.
For what it is worth, my heart issues from last year, along with the 'blood thinners' and beta-blockers that I take to control my heart rate means that the covid vaccinations are, for the time being, 'contra indicated'.
This is not an outright 'don't have the jab', more a warning that the possible consequences should be discussed beforehand. My GP has not got at clue, no idea that it might be an issue beyond the usual 'may be excessive bleeding' issue that plagues anyone on this medication. I am due to discuss progress with my cardiologist in the next week or so, let's see what he has to say. Interesting.
For what it is worth, my heart issues from last year, along with the 'blood thinners' and beta-blockers that I take to control my heart rate means that the covid vaccinations are, for the time being, 'contra indicated'.
This is not an outright 'don't have the jab', more a warning that the possible consequences should be discussed beforehand. My GP has not got at clue, no idea that it might be an issue beyond the usual 'may be excessive bleeding' issue that plagues anyone on this medication. I am due to discuss progress with my cardiologist in the next week or so, let's see what he has to say. Interesting.
AFCDorset
Roofer
Anecdotally there have been reports of deaths that have occurred shortly after the vaccine has been administered. However it would appear that this in not a consideration when it comes to writing a death certificate.
So, officially, the answer to your question is no.
AFCDorset
Roofer
There is a risk of anaphylactic shock with pretty much any injection, but we are looking for reactions directly related to the covid vaccine.
The important thing seems to be the obfuscation, data is 'not collected' so the authorities can not answer the obvious questions.
So no easy answers and, in any case, would a modern day mainstream journalist be prepared to go that far off message and risk their career?
The important thing seems to be the obfuscation, data is 'not collected' so the authorities can not answer the obvious questions.
So no easy answers and, in any case, would a modern day mainstream journalist be prepared to go that far off message and risk their career?
sixthswan
Non-Member
I'm not sure which world you live in?
Yes. A mainstream journalist would definitely want that story and would get it published.
The NY Times weren't afraid to ask questions - as an example:
www.nytimes.com
Yes. A mainstream journalist would definitely want that story and would get it published.
The NY Times weren't afraid to ask questions - as an example:
Doctor’s Death After Covid Vaccine Is Being Investigated
A Florida physician developed an unusual blood disorder shortly after he received the Pfizer vaccine. It is not yet known if the shot is linked to the illness.
AFCDorset
Roofer
I remain deeply sceptical that anything that may have an effect on the narrative will see the light of day in this country, we undoubtably live in the same world, but to paraphrase Billy Connolly, just folded differently.I'm not sure which world you live in?
Yes. A mainstream journalist would definitely want that story and would get it published.
The NY Times weren't afraid to ask questions - as an example:
Doctor’s Death After Covid Vaccine Is Being Investigated
A Florida physician developed an unusual blood disorder shortly after he received the Pfizer vaccine. It is not yet known if the shot is linked to the illness.
Rather more importantly, to me anyway, the article throws up an issue that has been troubling me, the issue of blood clotting. I am on medication to thin my blood and reduce my heart rate, so any vaccine that may tamper with that balance is of real concern to me.
So, for that reason, genuine thanks for the link...
