F
Foxgolfer
Guest
Good Grief . How can a person be so completely blind ?
“Fox is the only one that shows both sides”
And there in a nutshell is why everything this twit posts should never be taken seriously
How many of you who think Covid is made up
- Thread starter DagenhamFox
- Start date
“Fox is the only one that shows both sides”
And there in a nutshell is why everything this twit posts should never be taken seriously
F
Foxgolfer
Guest
Oh give up . He lost by 8 million you stupid man .
F
Foxgolfer
Guest
A few moronic sheep in silly red hats listening to a sex offender bragging , do not an election win
bnet
Roofer
shut up stupidGood Grief . How can a person be so completely blind ?
“Fox is the only one that shows both sides”
And there in a nutshell is why everything this twit posts should never be taken seriously
bnet
Roofer
shut up stupidA few moronic sheep in silly red hats listening to a sex offender bragging , do not an election win
bnet
Roofer
shut up stupidA few moronic sheep in silly red hats listening to a sex offender bragging , do not an election win
bnet
Roofer
S
SardiniaFox
Guest
bnet
Roofer
bnet
Roofer
you thick cunt,,,
nobody is this stupid you are troll, been mentioned before, now its become totally obvious.
F
Foxgolfer
Guest
S
SardiniaFox
Guest
And I was thinking of offering you a "cash out". Loser.
Yorkfox
Roofer
Quite a worrying listen on the day I go for my second Pfizer jab. She sounded genuine and pretty plausible for much of it but when she used the word genocide I wasn't so sure.
Anyway for a bit of balance here is the Reuters article that makes me think 'in for a penny in for a pound'
Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines do not alter a recipient’s DNA and U.S. FDA does not list death as a side effect
Posts are circulating on social media which claim to show how harmful COVID-19 vaccines are by listing 22 ingredients allegedly present in the vaccine. In addition, the posts claim that the vaccines contain nanotechnology and modify DNA, and that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration...
bnet
Roofer
Genocide it is.Quite a worrying listen on the day I go for my second Pfizer jab. She sounded genuine and pretty plausible for much of it but when she used the word genocide I wasn't so sure.
Anyway for a bit of balance here is the Reuters article that makes me think 'in for a penny in for a pound'
Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines do not alter a recipient’s DNA and U.S. FDA does not list death as a side effect
Posts are circulating on social media which claim to show how harmful COVID-19 vaccines are by listing 22 ingredients allegedly present in the vaccine. In addition, the posts claim that the vaccines contain nanotechnology and modify DNA, and that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration...www.reuters.com
If you accept what she says. then how other could you describe it ?
Club_B00k_Crutchless
Registered
Put enough monkeys in a room with a typewriter they'll produce Shakespeare.
S
SardiniaFox
Guest
Genocide? Really? Do you understand the words you type?
Yorkfox
Roofer
Genocide is the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the intent of destroying them.
I don't believe that to be the case. She has reasoned concerns about the vaccine and short cuts in its testing but genocide for me is the wrong word.
sixthswan
Non-Member
An interesting listen.
It is common public knowledge that the vaccines have been fast-forwarded and that clinical trials have been shorter. How could health professionals not know that?
Now, we have no proof that this woman is a nurse. Even if she is, that doesn't mean that everything she says is true. Putting up an NHS logo, doesn't add any credence to what she says.
But she does say that it is OK to vaccinate the over 65s and the clinically vulnerable.
The Nuremberg Trials and genocide bits really let her down. She should have left those bits out of the script.
Having said all that. I'm not having the vaccine.
She sounds a lot like Ann Devlin, from another video on here a few weeks back.
It is common public knowledge that the vaccines have been fast-forwarded and that clinical trials have been shorter. How could health professionals not know that?
Now, we have no proof that this woman is a nurse. Even if she is, that doesn't mean that everything she says is true. Putting up an NHS logo, doesn't add any credence to what she says.
But she does say that it is OK to vaccinate the over 65s and the clinically vulnerable.
The Nuremberg Trials and genocide bits really let her down. She should have left those bits out of the script.
Having said all that. I'm not having the vaccine.
She sounds a lot like Ann Devlin, from another video on here a few weeks back.
Richardvanles
Roofer
Granted it's an emotive word. But that's how news stories sell. If her fears are founded what word would you use?
Richardvanles
Roofer
Yeah probably more accurate. I guess it stems from what you believe our governments are capable of.
Would you call the Tuskegee (not sure if I've spelt that right) study genocide or neglect for example?
F
Foxgolfer
Guest
Quite a worrying listen on the day I go for my second Pfizer jab. She sounded genuine and pretty plausible for much of it but when she used the word genocide I wasn't so sure.
Anyway for a bit of balance here is the Reuters article that makes me think 'in for a penny in for a pound'
Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines do not alter a recipient’s DNA and U.S. FDA does not list death as a side effect
Posts are circulating on social media which claim to show how harmful COVID-19 vaccines are by listing 22 ingredients allegedly present in the vaccine. In addition, the posts claim that the vaccines contain nanotechnology and modify DNA, and that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration...
You really should be locked up selling this shite to the gullible sheep .
AFCDorset
Roofer
One thing to consider, particularly if you consider yourself fit and (reasonably) healthy.Quite a worrying listen on the day I go for my second Pfizer jab. She sounded genuine and pretty plausible for much of it but when she used the word genocide I wasn't so sure.
Anyway for a bit of balance here is the Reuters article that makes me think 'in for a penny in for a pound'
Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines do not alter a recipient’s DNA and U.S. FDA does not list death as a side effect
Posts are circulating on social media which claim to show how harmful COVID-19 vaccines are by listing 22 ingredients allegedly present in the vaccine. In addition, the posts claim that the vaccines contain nanotechnology and modify DNA, and that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration...
Recent figures from the ONS show that the total deaths from SARS CoV-2, where there are no co-morbitities to be around 9400.
This will will include some deaths where there were underlying issues which were not detected as no post mortem examination was carried out.
There are two separate issues here, firstly the short term effects as the body reacts to the vaccine, everything from life threatening blood clots to a slightly sore arm. If you are elderly or otherwise at risk, taking the vaccine might well be a sensible option.
The second, and for me most important, issue will be the long term effects on our immune system. A range of views are available from medical professionals, they range from the idea that the vaccine will improve the bodies resistance to not just SARS CoV-2 but any corona virus, to the suggestion that it will make us extremely vulnerable to the next 'novel' and perhaps deadly virus. Of course this is future speculation, you simply have to make up your own mind on this.
sixthswan
Non-Member
I don't know enough about Tuskegee and it was an American thing from many decades ago.
You could probably come up with a better example of state sponsored genocide from the 1930s and 1940s, without too much effort...
Talking about the present day. There is no genocide going on. If you think there is - what is the purpose?
To deliberately kill millions of people in the UK (and the world). A plan by capitalists, that make money and gain power; from human capital and misery?
Richardvanles
Roofer
Tuskegee went in into the 1970’s I believe.
I think the problem with the genocide train of thought is those that refuse the vaccine have obviously looked at this logically and realised that certain things don’t add up. They are the very people the governments of the world would want to get rid of. Those that have swallowed it hook line and sinker without any logical thought process are the ones the governments would want to keep.
(Disclaimer to say, like everyone else I don’t know what the long term effects will be or want to hazard a guess. But I know enough to know Governments don’t give a shit about us)
AFCDorset
Roofer
It is worth remembering that the man most invested in pushing the whole vaccination program has openly talked about reducing the population of the planet to around half a billion.
If that is the aim, then making vast swathes of the population susceptible to deadly viral illnesses might well be considered a good start.
If that is the aim, then making vast swathes of the population susceptible to deadly viral illnesses might well be considered a good start.
S
SardiniaFox
Guest
Susceptible to viruses (that some claim don't exist) by vaccinating against them?
Has he? Do you have a link to this thing that he has “openly talked about”?
I don't think he openly said that. I think he just said if things were to carry on population would be too big.
Fact check: No evidence Bill Gates said ‘at least 3 billion people need to die’
A video viewed thousands of times on social media attributes to Bill Gates a quote about “sterilization and population control”. The clip shows a man saying: “In the words of Bill Gates, at least 3 billion people need to die”. Reuters found no evidence Gates ever made such...