How come the lefties aren't talking about Hunter Biden's Laptop

jackieguaccamole said:
And all the information on it?
Click to expand...
Because we have no idea whether it is real or not. The Ukrainian nonsense is largely a matter of public record, I suspect most of the rest is true as well.

The 'swamp' is very big and very real, it has layers and layers, mostly well above my pay grade.

Politically, the Dems want to hamstring the constitution and turn the USA into a one party state that can be looted blind. Some people think that would be a good thing, the hard of thinking are being bribed by 'free stuff'.

Personally I think that would lead either to a break up of the Union or a perpetual state of low level civil war, glad I no longer live there.
 
I think there's a big gang of proper sick fuckers that includes Barry & Michael, Killary and Bill, The Podestas, Gates, Hanks and a few others. So ironically I think you are the blind fool. But we all have different opinions on the world
.
 
Who are Barry & Michael & Hank?
Sorry but not being a star fucker I'm clueless.
Are they all 'lefties' by any chance?
Surprised you haven't lazily thrown in Soros.
 
"Politically, the Dems want to hamstring the constitution and turn the USA into a one party state that can be looted blind. Some people think that would be a good thing, the hard of thinking are being bribed by 'free stuff"

Swap the words Dems with Tories.... and USA with UK..... and one can't help but feel this is pretty much what is going here too. All these PPE contracts with no procurement controls going to buddies....massive fees to consultancy agencies who are friends of Dom...jobs for the utterly incompetent wives of Tory MPs....furlough schemes/covid payments made to companies registered offshore...

"Looted" seems about right.
 
Eggs66 said:
"Politically, the Dems want to hamstring the constitution and turn the USA into a one party state that can be looted blind. Some people think that would be a good thing, the hard of thinking are being bribed by 'free stuff"

Swap the words Dems with Tories.... and USA with UK..... and one can't help but feel this is pretty much what is going here too. All these PPE contracts with no procurement controls going to buddies....massive fees to consultancy agencies who are friends of Dom...jobs for the utterly incompetent wives of Tory MPs....furlough schemes/covid payments made to companies registered offshore...

"Looted" seems about right.
Click to expand...
You may be surprised to hear this, but I do not disagree with a word of that, it is spot on.

But then I do not consider the Tory government to be remotely conservative, they are globalists in all the worse senses of the word.

I call myself a Nazi on here, simply because I am not to the left of Joe Stalin, in reality I consider myself to be a (small c) conservative, free speech, free trade, low tax, small government etc.
 
No, not surprised - elsewhere you have offered your opinion on Brexit where often you seem to accept the ideology of the exit plan falls apart due to a government of utter incompetence.

The blatancy of the cronyism and corruption is fairly breath-taking though.
 
Isn't it just. I also consider myself a pragmatist, I simply want a government that works for most of the people most of the time, about the best we can expect really.

No time for dogma, wherever it comes from.
 
The honourable Lord Janner was a pillar of the left and a kiddy fiddler who Blair ignored, the left have form on turning a blind eye on their scum.
 
Barrel said:
The honourable Lord Janner was a pillar of the left and a kiddy fiddler who Blair ignored, the left have form on turning a blind eye on their scum.
Click to expand...
Jesus, you're dumb and dumber rolled into on.
I give you the ultra leftie Maggie Thatcher and her comrade in arms Jimmy Savile.
 
hackneyfox said:
I hadn't realised that Biden's son was being accused of paedophilia.
This would be you going down the Qanon rabbit hole again?
Have you not wonderd why it's only the Democrats being accused of this and nobody from the Republican side?
You're being played for a fool.
Click to expand...
This is just the latest round of it.
Some on here, like Hackney and Barrel, will always get hooked by the 'left' 'right', 'party name'.
It works. You react true-to-form almost every single time. And it gives you an excuse to disregard it, as just being 'the other side's' hit job.

There's loads been accused over the years. Left/right. All parties.
 
RegiRoka said:
This is just the latest round of it.
Some on here, like Hackney and Barrel, will always get hooked by the 'left' 'right', 'party name'.
It works. You react true-to-form almost every single time. And it gives you an excuse to disregard it, as just being 'the other side's' hit job.

There's loads been accused over the years. Left/right. All parties.
Click to expand...
Strange you've missed out bnet, JG and anyone else spouting the Qanon tripe.
 
hackneyfox said:
Strange you've missed out bnet, JG and anyone else spouting the Qanon tripe.
Click to expand...
Nice like Barrowfox.
I'm talking about 'left' and 'right'. Anyone who constantly falls for that. From what I can see, you and Surfers constantly do.
Is it strange that I talk about one aspect? When I reply, must I follow a different formula and reply to everything?

As for Qanon. Genuinely, I don't have enough information to comment. I don't know enough about it, but judging from your reply, and Barrowfox's 'like', you two obviously do. So...
Can you please start a new thread about Qanon?
Can you tell me about its history?
Can you tell me about the key players who created it and how they run it?
Can you tell me the aims and strategies that they have?
 
RegiRoka said:
This is just the latest round of it.
Some on here, like Hackney and Barrel, will always get hooked by the 'left' 'right', 'party name'.
It works. You react true-to-form almost every single time. And it gives you an excuse to disregard it, as just being 'the other side's' hit job.

There's loads been accused over the years. Left/right. All parties.
Click to expand...
It's almost as though criminal and immoral tendencies have no significant connection to political views and opinions.
 
RegiRoka said:
Nice like Barrowfox.
I'm talking about 'left' and 'right'. Anyone who constantly falls for that. From what I can see, you and Surfers constantly do.
Is it strange that I talk about one aspect? When I reply, must I follow a different formula and reply to everything?

As for Qanon. Genuinely, I don't have enough information to comment. I don't know enough about it, but judging from your reply, and Barrowfox's 'like', you two obviously do. So...
Can you please start a new thread about Qanon?
Can you tell me about its history?
Can you tell me about the key players who created it and how they run it?
Can you tell me the aims and strategies that they have?
Click to expand...
So you mention myself and Suffers because we used the terms 'left' and 'right' yet you fail to pull up those who give a list of alleged paedos, who are liberals, as long as they don't use the terms 'left' and 'right'.
You, bnet & JG are being played but fail to see it.

Steve York has nailed it above.

I'm not claiming that there are no paedophiles on the 'left' clearly party politics has fuck all to do with it. I was just pointing out that certain posters are just blindly following the Qanon bullshit and not questioning why only liberals are being accused.

As a certain poster would say, 'I haven't got the time, do your own research'. ;)
 
hackneyfox said:
So you mention myself and Suffers because we used the terms 'left' and 'right' yet you fail to pull up those who give a list of alleged paedos, who are liberals, as long as they don't use the terms 'left' and 'right'.
You, bnet & JG are being played but fail to see it.

Steve York has nailed it above.

I'm not claiming that there are no paedophiles on the 'left' clearly party politics has fuck all to do with it. I was just pointing out that certain posters are just blindly following the Qanon bullshit and not questioning why only liberals are being accused.

As a certain poster would say, 'I haven't got the time, do your own research'. ;)
Click to expand...
With all due respect, we may all be 'being played'. We may all be. To be honest, I think that's the one question that's worth exploring the most. It's been playing on my mind for years.

But one thing I'm almost certain of, after a few less years of reading your messages Hackney... It looks very unlikely that you'll ever see the wood for the trees, tripping over your arses and elbows, while you're getting on with it. I am open to the fact that I might be wrong.

As for Qanon BS. Let's be about right. The reason I said I hadn't got the time regarding other subjects, was mainly because it was impossible on the old website and I felt it was impossible with you. Why?

Because people jumped in and threads wandered all over the place, while you were more interested in scoring points, posting ridicule and getting 'nifties'. I accept that that can all be good fun, and I don't have a problem with it, but when trying to discuss something seriously, it was a waste of time.

Now though... That's probably not going to happen, is it? Or should we just be honest?

You don't know about Qanon, do you?
I mean, you don't really know, do you?
I imagine someone's handed you a few buzzwords like 'alt right' or 'right wing', but come on. If you're going to say someone's blindly following something that is BS, you surely must be able to answer the questions I put forward. No?
 
RegiRoka said:
With all due respect, we may all be 'being played'. We may all be. To be honest, I think that's the one question that's worth exploring the most. It's been playing on my mind for years.

But one thing I'm almost certain of, after a few less years of reading your messages Hackney... It looks very unlikely that you'll ever see the wood for the trees, tripping over your arses and elbows, while you're getting on with it. I am open to the fact that I might be wrong.

As for Qanon BS. Let's be about right. The reason I said I hadn't got the time regarding other subjects, was mainly because it was impossible on the old website and I felt it was impossible with you. Why?

Because people jumped in and threads wandered all over the place, while you were more interested in scoring points, posting ridicule and getting 'nifties'. I accept that that can all be good fun, and I don't have a problem with it, but when trying to discuss something seriously, it was a waste of time.

Now though... That's probably not going to happen, is it? Or should we just be honest?

You don't know about Qanon, do you?
I mean, you don't really know, do you?
I imagine someone's handed you a few buzzwords like 'alt right' or 'right wing', but come on. If you're going to say someone's blindly following something that is BS, you surely must be able to answer the questions I put forward. No?
Click to expand...
Of course we may all be 'being played' but constantly trotting out claims about The Clintons, Gates, Soros, Obama & Biden but never querying why that website never mentions anyone from the 'right'. You don't thiink that's strange or that they have an agenda.
I don't know everything about Qanon but I can still smell BS. Shame you can't see it but you carry on believeing you're the only one capable of seeing through it all, Clearly neither of us have changed that much.
 
hackneyfox said:
Of course we may all be 'being played' but constantly trotting out claims about The Clintons, Gates, Soros, Obama & Biden but never querying why that website never mentions anyone from the 'right'. You don't thiink that's strange or that they have an agenda.
I don't know everything about Qanon but I can still smell BS. Shame you can't see it but you carry on believeing you're the only one capable of seeing through it all, Clearly neither of us have changed that much.
Click to expand...
:D
Dear Hackney.

You say that I believe that I'm the only one capable of seeing through it all? But...

What part of my admission that 'I don't have enough information to comment' didn't you understand?
I told you about my ignorance, twice:
1) I don't fucking know about Qanon.
2) I worry that we may be all being played.

And here we go again... Left - right - left - right.
Do you think the Clintons are really 'left'?
Do you think that Biden is really 'left'?
I mean, really?
Fuck me, no wonder you kept voting for the capitalist, coporatist, status quo, fuck the people, let's bomb another country Blair. Was that cunt 'left' too?

You said:
"I don't know everything about Qanon...". Oh, at last.
"but I can still smell BS." Really? It didn't fucking work with Blair, did it?

Like I said Hackney, I know I'm fucking ignorant.
But you...
 
jeez
You're the one so hung up on 'left' and 'right'.
Makes no difference where people are on the political spectrum, you're just muddying the waters as you always do.
Why haven't Qanon thrown their allegations at anyone to the right of Blair, Obama etc etc?

You have enough information to form an opinion on that, but you won't.
 
hackneyfox said:
jeez
You're the one so hung up on 'left' and 'right'.
Makes no difference where people are on the political spectrum, you're just muddying the waters as you always do.
Why haven't Qanon thrown their allegations at anyone to the right of Blair, Obama etc etc?

You have enough information to form an opinion on that, but you won't.
Click to expand...
Is it self-delusion?
Hackney in one breath: You're the one so hung up on 'left' and 'right'.
Hackney in the next breath: Why haven't Qanon thrown their allegations at anyone to the right of Blair, Obama etc etc?

:D :D

Muddying the waters?
Don't you think that the waters aren't muddy already? I do.
Personally, I'd like to try to see through it, not make it worse.

I've replied as honestly as I can in every message to you Hackney.
I may think about left and right, mainly because I think about everything. (You on the other hand, can't stop going on about it.)

It's obvious that some organisations think in the 'left/right' way too, and report this way. I can't answer for them.
And I can't answer for or comment on Qanon, because I'll say it again: I don't know enough about them.
If they are biassed as you suggest, then they are biassed.
But why would I express an opinion on something that I don't know enough about?
Obviously, you think it's something that people should do: give opinions on things that they don't know enough about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top