Expected behaviour leaflet

Very true. Prof has turned this into a discussion about who treats women the best. When the estimated 6-£10 000 is needed to achieve that, who seems to get it? Always the boys/men. Hence why the boats are loaded with ………men.
This makes no sense.
 
Not sure I understand how that has answered my question about what you mean in your previous comment. You seem to keep jumping to new scenarios without answering my queries. or is your answer the same as the previous "it means nothing"?
You always answer with a question! So, would, could you leave your women folk in a warzone or famine? I couldnt. They are always the most important to me, isnt the rule of thumb, women and children first? When cities were evacuated in WW2, who went first?
 
The usual pathetic Lefist excuses being rolled out again

The tactic stopped working a long time ago
 
He's arguing for the sake of it.
I'm saying just because someone calls it a fact doesn't mean it's true.

The point about 1 in 4 women suffering domestic abuse is very vague, I quickly calculated that I know 16 women fairly well, which means 4 of them have suffered domestic abuse, now I haven't asked them but I've never been aware of them being abused. That is not to say the figures are wrong but I am a bit doubtful. Of course since there doesn't seem to be a definition of abuse in your figures it is very hard to decide what is factual
 
You always answer with a question! So, would, could you leave your women folk in a warzone or famine? I couldnt. They are always the most important to me, isnt the rule of thumb, women and children first? When cities were evacuated in WW2, who went first?
You’re ignoring the issue of choice that was highlighted earlier.

What you’re saying is right in principle. But when the options are limited…
 
I'm saying just because someone calls it a fact doesn't mean it's true.

The point about 1 in 4 women suffering domestic abuse is very vague, I quickly calculated that I know 16 women fairly well, which means 4 of them have suffered domestic abuse, now I haven't asked them but I've never been aware of them being abused. That is not to say the figures are wrong but I am a bit doubtful. Of course since there doesn't seem to be a definition of abuse in your figures it is very hard to decide what is factual
The areas where “patriots” live upscale the average.
 
I'm saying just because someone calls it a fact doesn't mean it's true.

The point about 1 in 4 women suffering domestic abuse is very vague, I quickly calculated that I know 16 women fairly well, which means 4 of them have suffered domestic abuse, now I haven't asked them but I've never been aware of them being abused. That is not to say the figures are wrong but I am a bit doubtful. Of course since there doesn't seem to be a definition of abuse in your figures it is very hard to decide what is factual
And of course, women are not going to tell you that their husband/boyfriend gave them a slapping last night are they? And maybe your friends are in the 75% who aren't abused. I could get you the full explanation but I'm sure you not that interested. Abuse could of course be mental or other types. I personally believe that 25% is low, but maybe I mix with the wrong people ;-)
 
You’re ignoring the issue of choice that was highlighted earlier.

What you’re saying is right in principle. But when the options are limited…
I take it the choice go’s something like, “its shit and dangerous here. Someone needs to escape to safety. Mohamed, pack your grip, Jamilla, make him some sarnies for the trip”.
 
The right aren't always right. You do know that?
We are right to not want rapey stabby low IQ retarded fucking in-bred Africans and Muslims in the UK

It seems that HMG know where the problem is but are unwilling to take action beyond printing a leaflet that the rapey stabby low IQ retarded fucking in-bred Africans and Muslims won't be able to read because they are rapey stabby low IQ retarded fucking in-bred Africans and Muslims - who can't read

Clear?
 
You always answer with a question! So, would, could you leave your women folk in a warzone or famine? I couldnt. They are always the most important to me, isnt the rule of thumb, women and children first? When cities were evacuated in WW2, who went first?
You are simply confusing me. You were just going on about flying planes into buildings and terrorism. Is there a lot of that down your way? If they can fly planes they probably don't need to jam onto a rickety boat on an unsafe crossing and now you're asking me about WW2. Your anxiety that everyone you don't personally know is going to kill hundreds of people is unfounded. Someone you know is more likely to be killed by someone else you know and then most likely their husband.

I've known 2 people murdered during my life, both were murdered by their spouses (1 man, 1 woman) both were also cut up and disposal was attempted.
 
Please don’t reply to my posts if you can’t be bothered to read them properly
"Of course since there doesn't seem to be a definition of abuse in your figures it is very hard to decide what is factual"

I take it the choice go’s something like, “its shit and dangerous here. Someone needs to escape to safety. Mohamed, pack your grip, Jamilla, make him some sarnies for the trip”.
As you highlighted earlier, crossings are expensive so families would likely have to pool resources together to send one person. Who would that be? A single woman who is unlikely to be as strong and able to withstand the conditions of getting to France and crossing the channel, possible be sexually exploited or abused? Or a physically able young male?
 
I’m always intrigued by people believing surveys they agree with but ridiculing the ones they don’t believe
It depends on the background of the people you’re surveying - i.e. in most cases, it should be a true representation of the country’s demographics.

For example, if GB News do a straight Yes / No poll on whether NF is the best candidate to be PM, & 98% say “Yes”, that poll is unrepresentative for so many reasons, & cannot then be trumpeted by GBeebies as “news” or “the nation has spoken”.
 
Back
Top