Bournemouth

JohnMitten

Registered
They have proved that you can attain a mid table position on a low budget without any Prima Donna's.

Brighton? The Europa participation seems to have knocked the wind out of their sails.
 
Bournemouth have had the sixth highest net transfer spend in 23/24 and have a net spend of £179 million over the two seasons since returning to the PL. Nowhere near bottom end budget/ambition
 
Bournemouth have had the sixth highest net transfer spend in 23/24 and have a net spend of £179 million over the two seasons since returning to the PL. Nowhere near bottom end budget/ambition

So with their ground being so small and I’d suggest a negligible brand to sell stuff, how are they going to comply with FFP with those figures? Honest question
 
I dunno, my figures were from a couple of googled articles. They don't take into account all that amortisation shite. Just was aware theyd been spending a lot in the last three windows
 
They have proved that you can attain a mid table position on a low budget without any Prima Donna's.

Brighton? The Europa participation seems to have knocked the wind out of their sails.
Re brighton it's no surprise to me they sell all their best players and there's no way they can continue to keep signing quality replacements
 
So with their ground being so small and I’d suggest a negligible brand to sell stuff, how are they going to comply with FFP with those figures? Honest question
Because ticket sales is only a small part of revenue. Obviously been shrewd with their signings.
 
Brighton are piling up huge debts, even as they make a profit on player sales. And with not making Europe next season, with all the extra revenue that brings, something is going to give sometime soon.
 
They paid back £30m of debt last season, and will do the same this year after last summer's windfalls.
 
All of it to their owner, interest free, and most of it for building their stadium. No commercial borrowing as far as I know.
So completely atypical.
 
Back
Top