BC Game

SemperEadem said:
I can’t get a hardon over largest sponsorship deals for the club. Big bucks or not they shouldn't be having that on the shirt.
Click to expand...
I agree but it is a consequence of the PL sustainability rules that means generating revenue, regardless of the origin, is all the matters if you want to compete.

Gambling and sustainability. its all somewhat perverse.
 
Nomadic Fox said:
I agree but it is a consequence of the PL sustainability rules that means generating revenue, regardless of the origin, is all the matters if you want to compete.

Gambling and sustainability. its all somewhat perverse.
Click to expand...
Absolutly in the minority on this but i would rather not compete but still had a club thats not shafting its fans near weekly currently and just a sportswashing item for Thai politics
 
I prefer to have "King Power" on front of the shirts, everytime we have new sponser on front it all goes tits up!!
 
Been okay to have a duty free, online gambling and Bia Saigon as sponsors.
Fair play to you for your principles but that doesn’t work in the corporate world of the EPL.
Had to way turned round and said we have no sponsor this season so can’t buy players there would have been uproar.
 
hackneyfox said:
Been okay to have a duty free, online gambling and Bia Saigon as sponsors.
Fair play to you for your principles but that doesn’t work in the corporate world of the EPL.
Had to way turned round and said we have no sponsor this season so can’t buy players there would have been uproar.
Click to expand...
Easy to say on here but if you knew me you would know that I had the same issues with all of them.


We will never know the fees but I highly highly doubt the deal is the make or break on if we can sign players or not.
 
Interesting they say it will be on the front of adult kits...suggesting kids kits will not have it
If so, an admission that's it's not the most ethical of sponsors...
 
Adumass said:
Interesting they say it will be on the front of adult kits...suggesting kids kits will not have it
If so, an admission that's it's not the most ethical of sponsors...
Click to expand...
It's the law, I think.
Doubt the commercial cunts on their own would give a shit.
 
SemperEadem said:
Easy to say on here but if you knew me you would know that I had the same issues with all of them
Click to expand...
Funny you should say that because every time I've met a UF boy in Duffys post match, they all seem to be very left wing and the type that would vote Galloway all day long.
 
Adumass said:
Interesting they say it will be on the front of adult kits...suggesting kids kits will not have it
If so, an admission that's it's not the most ethical of sponsors...
Click to expand...
Same reasoning kids couldn't have the badge on their arm last season "Sky Bet Championship"
 
Adumass said:
So the shirts are out tomorrow, no fanfare, no build up. Guess they ain't super proud to be promoting a gambling pacman.

Remember folks , boycott the club shop until they refund the loyalty tax...
Click to expand...
Absolutely. I'm boycotting the whole thing.
 
hackneyfox said:
Been okay to have a duty free, online gambling and Bia Saigon as sponsors.
Fair play to you for your principles but that doesn’t work in the corporate world of the EPL.
Had to way turned round and said we have no sponsor this season so can’t buy players there would have been uproar.
Click to expand...
Says a man with no principles.
 
TopFox said:
It's the law, I think.
Doubt the commercial cunts on their own would give a shit.
Click to expand...
Gambling commission rules that shirts for children can't carry gambling ads.

Under 14 shirts (VAT exempt) can't carry such ads.

Under 18 teams can't have shirts with gambling ads on.

Advertising Standards Agency consider under 16 to be children - strictly the club shouldn't be selling shirts with the advert on to under 16.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top