How's that then? Not my money.
Nice bit of whataboutary.How's that then? Not my money.
Black woman buys house . How very dare she especially in a nice white neighbourhood.Nice bit of whataboutary.
Love it that you woke left get all Karened up about stuff then when reality hits you either completely ignore it or change the subject. (Please see covid vaccine thread for more evidence)
Twitter is quality for it.
Get up off your knee, realise she’s had your pants down and move on.
You were wrong, the rest of us were right (once more)
Not interesting at all. There’s been many many posts on here regarding BLM, not seen any regarding Sidney Powell. Not that I’ve seen anyway.Interesting that you raise this but remain quite about Sidney Powell scamming donations for legal actions based on lies, that she later claimed no reasonable person would believe.
its almost like you have an agenda
Fair enoughNot interesting at all. There’s been many many posts on here regarding BLM, not seen any regarding Sidney Powell. Not that I’ve seen anyway.
You need to find out what whataboutery means.Nice bit of whataboutary.
Love it that you woke left get all Karened up about stuff then when reality hits you either completely ignore it or change the subject. (Please see covid vaccine thread for more evidence)
Twitter is quality for it.
Get up off your knee, realise she’s had your pants down and move on.
You were wrong, the rest of us were right (once more)
Surely if they are hypocrites by definition they are not really marxists?Nothing to do with race Club Book, all about hypocrisy. see Shirley Williams for another example today.
BLM (in the USA) is, at it's core, a marxist organisation. Nice to see one of the organisations leaders and founders doing so well out of the movement.
Yep, slavery will learn em! Jump from one extreme to the other to quell the obvious.You need to find out what whataboutery means.
If she's had anyone's pants down then she needs booting out. Nice for certain people to have something to point to whenever equility gets raised in future. Probably should bring back slavery. That'll learn 'em.
You are scrupulously correct BF, it could be that the funds for multiple house purchases were from her book or other legitimate income sources. However I would still point out that, 'If it looks like a duck....'.Aren't you just guessing that she's used monies from the BLM movement to feather her own nest? maybe she bought it with proceeds from her book.
Of course the tactic of negative hit pieces against anti establishment leaders by the media to help sway opinion has been around for a long tim
Word salad SF, nothing more.Surely if they are hypocrites by definition they are not really marxists?
Ever thought that not everyone is a marxist? Your overuse of the term is a little tedious at times.You are scrupulously correct BF, it could be that the funds for multiple house purchases were from her book or other legitimate income sources. However I would still point out that, 'If it looks like a duck....'.
Word salad SF, nothing more.
The leaders of BLM appear to be authoritarian extremists, same as most politicians. Marxism is just the tool that they use.
You may think of her as an anti establishment leader. I view her as very much part of the establishment.Aren't you just guessing that she's used monies from the BLM movement to feather her own nest? maybe she bought it with proceeds from her book.
Of course the tactic of negative hit pieces against anti establishment leaders by the media to help sway opinion has been around for a long time.
What is it about her that makes you think she is pro establishment?You may think of her as an anti establishment leader. I view her as very much part of the establishment.
I don't really care what she spends her money on. It's a welcome distraction for some people. I'd rather take an interest in equality in society, you'd rather try to score points about her money.You may think of her as an anti establishment leader. I view her as very much part of the establishment.
Leading a movement that the establishment finances and support world wide.What is it about her that makes you think she is pro establishment?
OK I understand.Ever thought that not everyone is a marxist? Your overuse of the term is a little tedious at times.
What anyone does with their money is up to them. Where they get it from, particularly if it is from corruption or criminal activity, is of interest.I don't really care what she spends her money on. It's a welcome distraction for some people. I'd rather take an interest in equality in society, you'd rather try to score points about her money.
Think it’s a little unfair to call them a criminal organisation. I’m sure there are criminals in the organisation but I think the ones with sway and a voice are being used by the establishment to keep the divide going. It serves their purpose, while still not addressing the real injustices.What anyone does with their money is up to them. Where they get it from, particularly if it is from corruption or criminal activity, is of interest.
Black Lives Matter is a criminal organisation that thrives on violence, rioting and looting. One way or another she makes money from this and flaunts it in our and her supporters faces.
She is as bad as any corrupt politician in the USA, the UK or anywhere else for that matter.
Absolute nonsense. There are people who get involved in protests for the violence and looting if shops get smashed up, but to call them a criminal organisation is ridiculous.Black Lives Matter is a criminal organisation that thrives on violence, rioting and looting
Is lying to Parliament and the country criminal?I call it as I see it. The leadership pf BLM is deliberately vague and diffuse, It calls for rioting and violence in the USA on a regular basis, up to and including killing cops. That is criminal.
In the UK it carries out unlawful demonstrations and commits violence, that is criminal behaviour.
Check the BBC, he only breached rules he didn’t break anyIs lying to Parliament and the country criminal?
That's ok then.Check the BBC, he only breached rules he didn’t break any
Yes. In a sane world it would be considered Treason.Is lying to Parliament and the country criminal?
Cameron should be in prison for deliberately lying to the British public. Is that 'marxist' enough for you? Or maybe it is 'facist', you know, law and order and stuff!That's ok then.
Meanwhile he is allowing his Bullingdon chum to be investigated as long as they find no fault anywhere. Isn't that a bit "marxist"?
It'll be one of 2 outcomes:That's ok then.
Meanwhile he is allowing his Bullingdon chum to be investigated as long as they find no fault anywhere. Isn't that a bit "marxist"?